Sentences with phrase «says plays to its strengths»

Whenever they collaborate on a movie (this is the fourth time), Spielberg and Hanks say they play to their strengths, but by now they have succumbed to their weaknesses: they bring out the sentimentalist in each other.

I would say play to your strengths.

But in the weeks before the 2017 edition of The Armory Show, the first that truly bears his signature, a more demure Genocchio has emerged — and with him a revised strategy for the fair that he says plays to its strengths while rethinking what it means to be relevant in the current market.

Not exact matches

While being an entrepreneur can often require dabbling in many different roles, Rahn said that founders should always play to their strengths.

Target Canada president Tony Fisher said that variety plays to his company's strengths.

Rather than «competing on making shoelaces or cheap shirts,» Englander says, a shift to a more service - oriented economy could play better to Canada's strengths.

``, DFC Intelligence analyst Jeremy Miller says brand has the strength to experiment with online models, but must walk «a very tight line between satisfying hard - core online shooter players, the pick - up - and - play crowd, and investors.»

Schneider's CEO and Chairman Jean - Pascal Tricoire said the recent Aveva Group acquisition will play to both companies» strengths.

Playing to your strengths — or your unique «superpower» — energizes you, says Matthew Thomas, co-founder and executive director of InterSector, a leadership organization promoting collaboration among business, government and nonprofit sectors to solve society's challenges.

Holiday parties are typically set up to play against introverts» natural character, but Zack says understanding your strengths can help introverts survive and thrive at holiday get togethers.

That being said, Google is playing to its strengths as a global technology company.

«The NHL mourns the passing of those who perished and offers strength and comfort to those injured while travelling to play and be part of a game they all love,» Mr Bettman said in a statement.

Even Wenger mentioned (when Theo asks to play central and his played central he goes back to the right — when his played on the right he wants to play central), that says a lot, at 27 he doesn't even know his best position and strengths.

Wenger has no tactics, plays his favourite players over better players, gives long term contracts to average and injury prone players, hates strong physical players, plays players out of position, always looking for excuse like refrees and saying other teams played more in pre season, does nt spend money on players required like if we need strikers he will buy CAM, waits for other teams to buy top players and signs average on deadline day, calls accident when we lose, talks cohesion and mental strength when we beat terrible teams and win mickey mouse trophy like Asia cup and community shield.

«We're getting a player who has played for some of the best clubs in the world and is going to bring a lot of professionalism and strength to the roster right away,» said Minnesota United boss Manny Lagos.

Trust me, age's still a factor especially when your biggest strength is in your all action style of play, that is not to say he does not make them stronger but maybe we shouldn't make too much of it too.

I quote «we are an attacking team» is what he said, and to play to the players strength is to play 3 -5-2.

If he's going to play the Celtics, he said, he wants to do it at full strength and not on a minutes limit.

I have said it here time and time again that Theo Walcott has everything needed to play as a striker except for strength and aggression.Theo Walcott will always lose the physical battle when his back is to goal.That is a huge concern because its reduces the potency of the attack.I would really hope he stays on the wing and Wenger should sign a Centre forward.You cant just be rotating week in week out just like that you need your players to play so they can find form.Theo should stay on the wing.

He can legitimately say «what does strength have to do with playing Tackle?

Lets say up till now Arsenal haven't played at full strength, but NOW we have everyone roaring to go including the new signing, so lets make some freaking STATEMENT and show we are ready for it!!!!

Roger Staubach says, «It's a team of whiners, of guys who play to their weaknesses instead of forgetting about them and playing to their strengths.

AFC is not a one man team where we all play to one player» s strength, hw will be part of a group, will not even be the star player...... this forum is open, I will wager anyone a bet on here Vardy will not score 10 goals next season, whether with.us or with LCFC, I have said it publicly, anyone who wants to have a go is welcomed to, the ADMIN can be the middle man, # 50 says Varsy will not score 10 goals in the league nxt season anywhere he chose to play.....

I think you rightly say AFC do not play to his strengths, he performs better in a 2 man CF lineup.

Suffice it to say that we've never played OKC at full strength.

As the writer says we need to play players to their strengths as giroud himself lead monteplier to the title ahead of the likes of psg.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

«My job is to push that pile,» said Reed, as all 306 pounds of him certainly did on that play (it's rare «old - man strength» that Reed has, Carroll said).

What im saying is instead of using a system that plays to Lucas» strengths use one that plays to Isco's.

When Todd Haley took to the podium for the first time as Cleveland's offensive coordinator on Valentine's Day, he said, «What I believe in is playing to every player's strength that you have as best you can — putting players into position to succeed, playing to their skillset.»

I heard some funny things from our fans saying that him and Ozil being in the same team will be bad and that he's lazy.It's a shame that our club has turned into this.Can someone name a season where a team lost the title because of a player's laziness.Even in the csse of Arsenal no one has ever blamed us for not winning the title due to any player's laziness.The thing is about looking at the bigger picture.You need to look at whether the players in team are playing to their strengths.That's the most important thing.If Ozil played to his strength no one would mention anything about laziness.I hope we sign Riyad Mahrez.

This is what the arsenal manager is going to say We conceded a cheap goal flamini was caught in the ball we need to take advantage when we are on top and try to kill the game but I was happy with mental strength so that I can play with 5 cams and lose to galatasray and then lose to Chelsea overall diaby should be back»

Other than that, I'd say he's been a fantastic acquisition for us; he still has enough desire, hunger, power and strength to play at a high level for another couple of years; and I really hope he stays.

I've had enough of this crap, look I honesty do think giroud is a good striker and he is a fairly consistant goal scorer, and every time he played for arsenal he gave 100 percent and I think we all appreciated the way he was, a true professional, but to say we as fans were too critical of him or that he didn't have enough of a chance at arsenal is just absolute bullshit, first of all he has scored more headed goals than any other player in the prem since he arrived in 2012 so we did play to his strengths and he was our main striker for four long years and every pundit on sky and motd has at one point said Giroud is not enough for arsenal to win the title ect, but, now we have sold him he is apparently the best thing since sliced bread and the best buy of the transfer window blah blah fuc * # * g blah.

Bellerin has shown he has a few tricks and can offer something in attack, heck some might say Bellerin is better at getting forward and this might play to his strengths.

I'm not saying he isn't lazy.I'm saying that it's not a solid basis to say we shouldn't sign him.There are similar players to him in top teams that win trophy year after year.The fact is that those players are playing to their strengths.You need to look at the bigger picture and his qualities.If Mahrez plays to his strengths laziness won't be an issue and that's the same with Ozil too.He's not playing to his strengths so people are faulting him there.Also I've watched enough of Mahrez to know he has end product.He also scores a lot of goals in style.

on the flip side, people could say that one is a mature team player, very coachable, plays within a system / to his teammates strengths and is a proven winner.

«We played to our strengths,» Gonsalves said of his team turning the game around.

Yossarian, Sorry mate, but you have misread what I said: On the first point, I asked if it was a rollocking from the manager or the players relising they were not playing to their strength and abilities.

But having said that we need to play to his strengths and he (& the team) are at there best when Olivier is flanked with wingers and pace.

Wenger said: «My belief is that Jeff is ready to play because he has it all in his locker — the strength, the physical power, the technical level.

«And that's a testament to our training staff and how hard he's worked, and we didn't see any signs of, like I said, him limping, and when he made that play down in the corner, he showed good arm strength and he showed good balance and control, so that was a big step.»

But, if we play to our strengths (UCL, Milan at home), probably score 2 goals and still lose (referee, red cards, no Ox, whatever), I would say good job, better luck.

I've said this before... we do not play to our strengths against the opposition.

We have to defend well to win the games.Like andrew said defenders job is to defend not attack.Defenders should be attack during set pieces.If we play a big team we have to change the formation to 4 -4-2 or 4 -5-1, it will be good since we lack physical strength.

Talking about the advantage of playing at home ground, Wenger said: «At home we have been very strong and our home strength will certainly be vital to decide where we finish at the end of the season.»

That being said, we do have good deliverers of a ball in Trippier and Davies, so I'm not sure why, when the spaces are out wide and we have a big target man in Llorente, we don't play to our strengths?

«Play provides an opportunity to build strength in muscles and understanding in the brain of how to interpret a child's environment,» says Amy Baez, a pediatric occupational therapist, author and founder of Playapy, «Babies learn from play through simple activities like moving their eyes, to holding their arms up, to holding a bottle, to lifting their heads up off the flPlay provides an opportunity to build strength in muscles and understanding in the brain of how to interpret a child's environment,» says Amy Baez, a pediatric occupational therapist, author and founder of Playapy, «Babies learn from play through simple activities like moving their eyes, to holding their arms up, to holding a bottle, to lifting their heads up off the flplay through simple activities like moving their eyes, to holding their arms up, to holding a bottle, to lifting their heads up off the floor.

«He said, «I'm going to address my weaknesses, but also play to my strengths»,» Balls said.

He said while he knew the top person would not be perfect, they must have «some X-factor» and a future election campaign must be played to their strengths.