Sentences with phrase «says something about where»

(I guess this says something about where the line of degradation exists for actors, or perhaps more accurately men in general.)

But it says something about where their support springs from that the biggest danger they face on the doorstep is from voters who share their views.

Not exact matches

«I remember, like, you don't often get so obsessed about something where you drop everything and drive to Boston and meet with people for 14 hours, taking notes, losing your voice, with no idea just to learn,» he said.

Turner: One of the things that people in the industry often talk about when it comes to money management is this barbell, where as you said you have low - cost, passive index tracking funds and at the other end you have higher fees, higher active share, things like private debt which you mentioned, and it's those in the middle that are charging higher fees for something that looks quite a lot like beta that are really going to struggle.

«There is something magical about a book discussion in a room where the secret treasures are hidden,» Feeney says.

While it's not exactly a conspiracy, where trade press give good reviews to games in exchange for lucre, there is something to be said about fans of a product reviewing the product.

Each one says something empirical about the plight of a small business, but also tells a story about where the biggest pitfalls and challenges are, and how to avoid them.

«You hear so many stories about that «one great idea» where someone lucked out and identified a gap in the market, or created something that no one had ever thought of before,» says Rubio.

You mean that even in those cases where we actually do know something about the subject, like the HST, we don't say it.

This was one of about ten places in my 500 - page dissertation where I said Tocqueville was wrong about something!

The challenge to say something about God and the black liberation struggle was enhanced when Ronald Goetz (a classmate during my student years at Garrett) invited me in February 1968 to lecture at Elmhurst College, where he was teaching.

We need to be careful about what CS Lewis calls «Chronological Snobbery» where we think we know better simply because we are further along the timeline than those who came before us, but at the same time, there is something to be said about progressive revelation.

So we're at the place where we can say a couple - four things from the existential side of the problem of evil: [1] from the perspective that pain exists, and we perceive it, we as human beings (you could say «people») have an urge to do something about it when we see it.

Roddy Hackett demanded that Stone say something about the supposed evidence of Hackett's IRA involvement and asked where the dossier was to be found.

but, I don't care where it comes from — you give me someone saying something other than «we just don't know» about god, and I'll show you a salesman, or a politician, or a lobbyist.

The lowest forms of despair, where there really was no inwardness, or at all events none worth talking about, the lowest forms of despair one might represent by describing or by saying something about the outward traits of the despairer.

A second clue is something you wrote in a comment to me which I found odd (not the comment where you called me a troll — an ugly character — that's totally understandable) I'm talking about when you wrote: «I wouldn't say my «faith» changes.

In bed, in chemo chairs, in waiting rooms, I try to say something about dying in a world where everything happens for a reason.

I was thinking of saying something similar about Brian, but since I have only read a few of Brian's books, and never met him, I didn't know for sure where he stood on absolute truth, or some of the other questions Glenn brought up.

Every since mankind has been as the Apostle described us in his epistle (Again, 2 nd Timothy 3:1 - 5; see also what Jesus said in Mark 7:20 - 23), the only thing that has «advanced «at our hands is our architecture, our technology, and our search for medicinal cures for what ails us.No one is denying that we've done tremendous good with these various advances, but we've also done awful, vicious, horrendous atrocities and brutalities as well.I've heard it quoted that out of all the centuries, millennia that we've considered ourselves «civilized», we've had only a few hundred years where something approximating peace has held sway among us.So again, I'm all world seeking to «make the world a better place», as it were; I just believe that mankind in his present moral, ethical, and spiritual configuration is capable of doing so.We can always enhance out technological prowess, improve our architechural designs, and make our drugs more powerful, but what about our hearts?

Finally found some people that going through the same thing as me Im 16 when i got saved i wanted to know alot about the Bible and God then there was one day in my bedroom where i was watching someone talking about blasphemy of the holy spirit and i kindda got curious and said something that i did nt mean and after that i felt a barrage of thoughts saying blasphemous things about god i wanted it to stop but it wouldnt it would allways happen randomly and finally figured that cussing god wasnt the unforgivable sin i finnaly calmed down and accepted that God still loves me but the thoughts still wont stop

Another analogy is with what Russell, called «causal lines,» where you distinguish routes within the whole continuum of nature, and saying something about one of them at one stage enables you to infer something about it at another stage.

Eventually, there is a scene on an airplane talking with one of his hanger - on biker - crowd drinking buddies about the future of rock, where Jim says, with moving sincerity, that what the rock audience really wants is something spiritual.

Arthur Hertzberg tells of a gathering of rabbis» wives where more could say something intelligent about Aquinas than they could about Maimonides.

But we're not talking about discriminating tastes where one prefers the finer things — you're saying something that no pastor would say in public (that only a few are welcome to serve in leadership).

There is a show that is supposed to be funny... about home videos where people have «accidents» or strange things happen to them and often I believe someone must have gotten hurt when they fall or slam into something... and people just roar and think it is so funny, but stuff like that does not make me laugh as I think about how that must have hurt... so I guess humor is in one's funny bone, and that is about all I can say about comedy!

A second clue is something you wrote in a comment to me which I found odd (not the comment where you called me a troll, that's totally understandable) I'm talking about when you wrote: «I wouldn't say my «faith» changes.

«There's something to be said [about] walking into a place [where] a server knows you by your name,» Martino says.

«Cowboy Culture celebrates something really positive about where we're from,» he says.

Where is the guy that said something about totenham's squad being better than ours and that chadli and Kane were world class?

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Just airing a 5 - minute youtube video after every game where he says something about how he sees the current state of affairs.

Its nice to see some people have open there eyes but all is true lets ask our selves have this team change from last season where are the experienced players that wenger talked about he selling us bull and every season he gets away with it the fans deserve better am from the caribbean so chance r i might never get to see arsenal live at the emirates because its too expensive at least the club should be winning things i know its important to balance the books you must BUT football is about trophies as well and thats were the balance lies how the hell can we go Six (6) seasons yes 6 without a trophy not even a FA cup or carling cup and no one says a word about the manager that is rubbish Arsenal live in the past too much the time is now this season for me is the absolute last for wenger to win something i do nt care how much money he has made the club and Wenger if you cant bring that then go work for an oil company and make them money and leave arsenal to a manager who is willing to win something not only buy players for 10 million who take 10 years to develop am frustrated with this man.

Following the bitter home defeat at the hands of league leaders Chelsea, Blackburn boss Sam Allardyce opened up about his concerns over where the team find themselves with regards to the Premier League table and how the battle to remain in England's top - flight will be one of the toughest he's ever embarked upon — And that's saying something as the former Bolton and Newcastle gaffer has been involved in his fair share, although has never been relegated as a Premiership manager.

And it's where we love to hear your funny stories about you breastfeeding your babies, or pumping for your babies, and let's just say things don't exactly go the way you thought they were going to go in your head, something happens, usually something embarrassing.

Set up scenarios where one of the action figures or stuffed toys takes his toy or says something bad about him... then coach him on ways he can respond appropriately.

«It's understandable to be concerned about setting a precedent, but there already are probably a dozen examples around the county where this sort of thing or something similar has happened,» said Didzerekis, who was on the Wheaton Park District board for eight years before joining the County Board in 1998.

«The project is finally at the point where we can talk to people about something real,» said Michelle Kelly, park planner for the Elmhurst Park District.

«It's definitely something that we are thinking about,» said Gene Han, a vice president who heads Target's innovation center in San Francisco, where the startup pitch meeting was held.

Will Self who has shut himself off in Jura (where George Orwell wrote the novel) is sure to have something interesting to say about this as usual.

Rent is too expensive and instead of home rule, where we can actually do something about rent, the governor keeps control in Albany,» Teachout said.

«Increasingly James has been thinking about the Labour party and the labour movement and he's moved to a different position where, for instance, he supports a living wage, but that was something that when he was a cabinet minister he said he opposed.

Where Harold Wilson's now dated «moral crusade» was about winning in order actually to do something, the essence of New Labour had been about saying and doing something (which could, in effect, have been anything) purely in order to win.

«They haven't figured out where the party is, and they are hedging their bets at this point and being cautious about what they say, because if they say something positive they'll sound like they're committing themselves in a certain direction.»

«I'm not going to comment on any of it because we are at that very sensitive moment in time, being the 29th day of March, where even saying something positive about the budget can derail the entire process,» said Sen. Andrew Lanza (R - Staten Island).

«Now people removed all that I said about the poor management of the economy and then made it look like I started by talking about the resource locations of this thing and put it forward and changed certain things to make me look like I was being a tribalist and it was bad, this is where I find people very mischievous;... You take the whole thing out of context and make it look very tribalistic, so, I think, yes, it happened, newspapers reported something wrong and I think people should be ashamed of themselves when they do this kind of «cut and paste» to create that wrong impression in the system...» Mr Osafo Marfo clarified.

«I think for us and the conference, I think it's important for us to kind of put out where we are so that these guys (the Daily News) will maybe talk about something else other than this topic in the Daily News,» he said.

«This was in a way the moment where you could see back 4.5 billion years into... evolution to the most primitive organisms and understand something about life on Earth,» Ban says.

Steve: As I said, I've promised we have something for the dog people out there, and we have a short article in the front of the magazine, where we have the news pieces, about the amazing physical capabilities of high performance sled dogs.

Voinnet saw a connection that few others saw: He was aware of reports in other organisms «where it was somehow clear» — to him, intuitively — «that there was something more about silencing than just a system that was activated by transgenes,» he says.