Sentences with phrase «scale average values»

It's important to remember that, as this is a systematic review study, it provides large - scale average values rather than specific diet strategies.

Not exact matches

The scale for this question was reversed, with 1 corresponding to «strongly agree» and 7 to «strongly disagree;» the average response value was 4.4.

Because the neutron decays on a time scale similar to the period for BBN, accurate simulations of the BBN era require thorough knowledge of the neutron lifetime, the average time required for a neutron to decay, but this value is still not precisely known.

Responding on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 corresponding to «strongly disagree,» 4 to «neither agree nor disagree,» and 7 to «strongly agree,» the average response value was 4.5.

Our effective temperature scale is between 0 - 200 K cooler than that expected from the Infrared Flux Method, depending on the adopted extinction map, which provides evidence for a lower value on average than that inferred for the Kepler Input Catalog (KIC).

If the Department believes percent proficient is also important for reporting purposes, these values could be reported alongside the average scale scores.

The value advantage may or may not continue in the future, and even if it does continue it is impossible to know whether the scale of the outperformance will remain similar to its historical average.

C is not constant for the dT» / dt equation to apply because heat penetrates through different parts of the climate system (different depths of the ocean in particular) over different time scales (also, if T» is supposed to be at some reference location or the global average at some vertical level, T» at other locations will vary; C will have to be an effective C value, the heat per unit change in the T» at the location (s) where T» occurs)

For temperature scales where there are negative values in the data set, root mean square will not produce a meaningful result because negative and positive values of the same magnitude contribute the same positive amount to the average.

Hunter and Brown calculated an average acceleration in the central projection of the IPCCs AR4 A1FI emission scenario (including scaled - up ice sheet discharge) of 0.002 mm per year over the period 1990 — 2010 (see the value plotted at 2000 in their Fig. 1, ref.

The NCAR 2000 black carbon global emission is set at the average of the GISS and GFDL 2000 values, and follows this scaling in the future, for illustrative purposes.

The recent decadal average is up around 1 C on this scale, and well above the 2004 value indicated in the graph, and hence above the mean across all decades.

This product is a global - scale climate diagnostic tool and provides a big picture overview of average global temperatures compared to a reference value.

The corresponding working quasilinear wave equation for the barotropic azonal stream function Ψm ′ of the forced waves with m = 6, 7, and 8 (m waves) with nonzero right - hand side (forcing + eddy friction) yields (34) u˜ ∂ ∂ x (∂ 2Ψm ′ ∂ x2 + ∂ 2Ψm ′ ∂ y2) + β˜ ∂ Ψm ′ ∂ x = 2Ω sin ϕ cos2 ϕT˜u˜ ∂ Tm ′ ∂ x − 2Ω sin ϕcos2 ϕHκu˜ ∂ hor, m ∂ x − (kha2 + kzH2)(∂ 2Ψm ′ ∂ x2 + ∂ 2Ψm ′ ∂ y2), [S3] where x = aλ and y = a ln -LSB-(1 + sin ϕ) / cos ϕ] are the coordinates of the Mercator projection of Earth's sphere, with λ as the longitude, H is the characteristic value of the atmospheric density vertical scale, T˜ is a constant reference temperature at the EBL, Tm ′ is the m component of azonal temperature at this level, u˜ = u ¯ / cos ϕ, κ is the ratio of the zonally averaged module of the geostrophic wind at the top of the PBL to that at the EBL (53), hor, m is the m component of the large - scale orography height, and kh and kz are the horizontal and vertical eddy diffusion coefficients.

Accounting for the characteristic spatial scale ΔA of the relevant Airy function (see Basic Necessary Conditions and Assumptions) at the waveguide's boundaries, the averaging of [S18] over Δ yields the following estimate for A˜m, max, at typical values of l0 ≈ (0.3 − 0.5) × 10 − 6 m − 2, ΔQRA / Δ ≈ 0.3 − 0.5, and ΔA / Δ ≈ 0.2 − 0.25: A˜m, max ≈ K2 -LSB-(K2 + l02 + l04) / (m / a) 2] Kl0u ¯ 0ΔQRA2 Δ.

Basically, I calculated the temperature trend for each gridbox between 60N and 60S, averaged the longitudinal values, and plotted a scaled image by latitude and depth.

Values are also averaged over successive four - month periods, to enable variations on upwards of the seasonal time scale to be seen more clearly than if monthly values had been plValues are also averaged over successive four - month periods, to enable variations on upwards of the seasonal time scale to be seen more clearly than if monthly values had been plvalues had been plotted.

• The huge negative values of coefficients of efficiency at those scales show that model predictions are much poorer that an elementary prediction based on the time average.

Citigroup recently produced a report that suggested they amounted to around 1 per cent of the value of the Australian Stock Exchange — about the same scale as the average daily movement on the index.

In fact the Mauna Loa or global CO2 rise is much faster than linear... the differences between the mauna loa / global are negligible for the purpose of radiative transfer, and the difference in average CO2 concentration between an «average global» data - set and the Mauna Loa record since 1980 (for monthly values) is only 0.65 ppm (and with a correlation coefficient r greater than 0.99) indicating that the Mauna Loa record is representative of global - scale CO2 concentration as you'd expect with a well - mixed gas.

Might the «weather» of orbital cycles be impacted by K / T but not the «climate» — perhaps the trajectories of obliquity, precession and eccentricity would become completely different given sufficient time, but maybe with the same general character — periods and amplitudes and average values being similar enough that a casual glance at any given time segment (on the necessary scale to characterize the orbital cycle «climate») wouldn't look like anything different.

A survey of Twitter users from MarketingProfs referenced by eMarketer reports that, on a scale from 1 to 5 (with 1 for strongly disagree and 5 and for strongly agree), the phrase «I find it exciting to learn new things from people» averaged a score of 4.65 and «I value getting information in a timely manner» averaged 4.58.

Before plotting and interpreting the distributions, let me quantify the qualitative values I used earlier: on a 0 to 10 scale, a bad movie is somewhere between 0 and 3, an average one between 3 and 7, and a good one between 7 and 10.

Test — retest reliability of these scales is high over a period averaging 8 days (r values =.82 — .93) and internal consistencies are adequate (α values =.63 — .79; Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001).

All indexes are deseasonalized, scaled to have an average value of 100 for the period 2013 - 2015, and are adjusted for Redfin market share.

NeighborhoodScout is the only source for real estate value trends and forecasts at a scale 10X smaller than the average ZIP code.