In conclusion, I suggest moving away from the framework of carbon removal as a «third way» and instead framing carbon removal as a critical yet largely missing piece of «Plan A» to deploy large -
scale climate change mitigation strategies.
Not exact matches
The report provides scientifically sound practical guidance for selecting SLM practices that help address DLDD,
climate change adaptation and
mitigation, and for creating an enabling environment for their large -
scale implementation considering local realities.
Quantitative integrated assessment of
climate change risks is not always possible, but it can play a key role in informing decisions both about local adaptation and about large -
scale mitigation policy.
Resources to support both
mitigation and adaptation will need to be substantially
scaled up to address
climate change.
While BCDR promises some direct (
climate) and ancillary (restoration, habitat protection) benefits, Pg C -
scale implementation may be constrained by ecological factors, and may compromise the ultimate goals of
climate change mitigation.
There is an urgent need to
scale up financial flows, particularly financial support to developing countries; to create positive incentives for actions; to finance the incremental costs of cleaner and low - carbon technologies; to make more efficient use of funds directed toward
climate change; to realize the full potential of appropriate market mechanisms that can provide pricing signals and economic incentives to the private sector; to promote public sector investment; to create enabling environments that promote private investment that is commercially viable; to develop innovative approaches; and to lower costs by creating appropriate incentives for and reducing and eliminating obstacles to technology transfer relevant to both
mitigation and adaptation.
In fact, the NAS report highlights that it is very important to invest in developing CDR systems in addition to rapidly
scaling up
climate mitigation and adaptation solutions (given the importance of viable, sustainable, CDR options in the event we do not decarbonize as quickly as necessary to prevent
climate change).
It denies both
mitigation in the form of renewable energy funding even as it denies the necessary level of support in response to the disasters that
climate change produces in ever - greater numbers and on increasingly destructive
scales.
In part as a result of
climate change mitigation policies to promote biofuels and growing concern about food insecurity in middle and high income countries, large -
scale land acquisition in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America has displaced small landholders and contributed to food price increases.
Nevertheless, the work provides another compelling argument «to start
scaling up the myriad
climate change mitigation strategies that already exist — green subsidies and investment, carbon taxes and markets, and especially ending fossil fuel subsidies,» Lesk said.
Bolivia draws strongly and explicitly upon ethical justifications for requiring deep cuts in national ghg emissions by other nations, together with financial contributions and holistic
mitigation and adaptation measures, capable of both reducing poverty and vulnerability to
climate change yet has not identified an equity framework that could be applied at the global
scale.
The group address
climate change mitigation at the community
scale by providing recommendations for effective strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG).
We're discussing catastrophic anthropogenic
climate change (CACC)-- forecasts by some scientists that the
climate will
change in ways unfavorable to humanity, in magnitudes that will cause large -
scale adverse effects, at rates such that sufficient adaptation and
mitigation will be difficult or impractical.
The outcome should also substantially
scale up financial assistance to developing countries, promote technology development, dissemination and transfer, pay particular attention to the needs of the poorest and most vulnerable to adapt to
climate change, promote steps to preserve and enhance forests, and provide for full transparency with respect to the implementation of
mitigation measures and provision of financial, technology and capacity building support.
The summary of IPCC's report on
climate -
change mitigation strategies was especially bad, scoring just 6.7 points on the readability
scale.
In addition, Article 9 states that the provision of
scaled - up financial resources should aim to achieve a balance between adaptation and
mitigation, taking into account country - driven strategies, and the priorities and needs of developing country Parties, especially those that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of
climate change and have significant capacity constraints, such as the least developed countries and small island developing States, considering the need for public and grant - based resources for adaptation.
partnered with client and Bren Corporate Partner AECOM to «address
climate -
change mitigation at the community
scale by providing recommendations for effective strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions,» according to the project final report.
Among the issues reviewed were: • The prospects for air pollution and
climate change in the region up to 2030 in the absence of action on SLCPs; • The potential contribution of SLCP
mitigation to
climate, health and food security, and more generally to economic development; • Feasible
mitigation technologies and strategies and opportunities for their implementation at national
scale; • The relationship of SLCP
mitigation to broader regional air pollution and
climate strategies and their benefit for the MENA region.
The groups are particularly concerned that large -
scale bioenergy and biofuels, waste incineration, nuclear power and carbon capture and storage (CCS) are referred to as «low carbon» in
mitigation models, despite concerns raised elsewhere that some of those technologies are risky, unproven and could actually make
climate change worse.
If BCDR could be implemented on the
scale of 1 Pg of carbon (C) per year — the magnitude of stabilization wedges used in Pacala and Socolow (2004)-- it could contribute substantially to
climate change mitigation.
Positive actions are underway at multiple, smaller
scales to start the process of
climate change mitigation.
«Fossil fuel subsidies work against Canada's commendable progress in putting a price on carbon — they give money and tax breaks to the sources of carbon pollution that we're trying to
scale back,» Amin Asadollahi, North American Lead on
Climate Change Mitigation at the International Institute for Sustainable Development, said.
The range of possibilities highlighted for future
climate at all
scales clearly demonstrates the urgency for
climate change mitigation measures and provides non-discountable ranges which can be used by the impacts community (e.g. Stern 2006).