She is currently working on the implementation research and impact analyses for the Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation (MIHOPE), a large -
scale national evaluation of home visiting programs that intend to prevent child maltreatment and improve maternal and child health, parenting skills, and child development outcomes.
She has led MDRC's partnership with service providers for multiple large -
scale national evaluations, including two offering some of the most promising models serving pregnant women, new mothers, and their infants — the Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation (MIHOPE) and MIHOPE - Strong Start — and one offering a promising model for young adults, the YouthBuild Evaluation.
Not exact matches
The new
National Center for Development and
Evaluation should solicit and implement large -
scale, systematic development projects - a role that has been largely missing from the Department of Education's agenda in recent decades.
The studies range from large -
scale assessments (
National Assessment of Educational Progress [NAEP] and Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study [TIMSS]-RRB-, to
evaluations of specific interventions (class - size reduction and vouchers), to commission reports (
National Reading Panel,
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future), to data analyses (Education Trust on teacher quality, Jay Greene on graduation rates).
The
National Center for Education
Evaluation has funded more than 34 large -
scale impact
evaluations since 2002.
From 2008 - 2013, Jennie worked American Institutes for Research conducting large
scale program
evaluations and research projects at the district, state, and
national level.
WestEd is a leader in moving research into practice by conducting research and development (R&D) programs, projects, and
evaluations; by providing training and technical assistance; and by working with
national, regional, state, and local policymakers and practitioners to carry out large -
scale school improvement and innovative change efforts.
This
evaluation of the first two years of the
national demonstration of ExpandED Schools (the 2011 - 12 and 2012 - 13 school years) focused on the implementation of TASC's model and on strategies used by schools and community partners to
scale up and institutionalize expanded learning.
Our pivotal role is to lead a multidisciplinary consortium to provide schools and communities with technical expertise in: school improvement; teacher training and behaviour change programmes at a
national scale; girls» education, protection and rights; community mobilisation and cash transfers; primary health care, school health and non-state slum education; and monitoring, research and
evaluation in education.
Conducted by Policy Studies Associates (PSA), the
evaluation of the first two years of the
national demonstration of ExpandED Schools (the 2011 - 12 and 2012 - 13 school years) focused on the implementation of TASC's model and on strategies used by schools and community partners to
scale up and institutionalize expanded learning.
An overview of (1) key research findings on the Research for Action (RFA)
scale - up and sustainablity study and case studies of the LDC and MDC initiatives; and (2) the UCLA
National Center for Research on
Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) evaluation of LD
Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST)
evaluation of LD
evaluation of LDC and MDC.
She is a nationally recognized expert on accountability for early childhood programs, assessment, and large -
scale studies of children with disabilities, serving on
national advisory boards and consulting to major
evaluations to help create designs that adequately address such issues as oversampling and measurement of disability.
Research conducted by the TCC Group, a
national program and
evaluation firm, found that organizations operating as Service Enterprises outperform peer organizations on all aspects of organizational effectiveness, and are more adaptable, sustainable and capable of
scaling their work.
Such projects have a broad range, and may include things such as: the construction and interpretation of climate change scenarios on local to
national scales, the study of changes in extremes, the
evaluation of impacts on infrastructure, forests, agriculture, and energy production and distribution.
Importantly, states were required to spend at least three - quarters of the federal funds on home visiting models that met federal standards of evidence - based effectiveness.1 As many policy scholars have noted, that a
national initiative brought the importance of evidence - based practice to the forefront of public policy is a triumph for social science and demonstrates the importance of rigorous program
evaluation.2 With that triumph, however, comes a responsibility to ensure that the public's expectations for success of these programs are consistent with what researchers understand about the empirical evidence — will the same positive outcomes found in programs» randomized controlled trials emerge when those programs are taken to
scale?
A
national evaluation of the MIECHV program will also provide new insights into the effects of evidence - based home visiting programs for families with infants when
scaled up across the country.
Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning CASEL supports district - wide social - emotional learning (SEL) programs; conducts research and
evaluation; works with program providers to strengthen their capacity as they respond to growing demand; develops tools to support SEL on a
national scale; advances state - of - the - art assessment; develops clear, powerful messages and strategic communications about SEL and its impact; and advocates for federal and state legislation.
Woodbridge currently directs multiple large -
scale national, statewide, and local research,
evaluation, and technical assistance projects.