Ever since the reactor at Chernobyl exploded in 1986 spewing radioactivity over more than 20 countries, Europeans have lived in fear of another large -
scale nuclear disaster.
Not exact matches
Anne Thompson, chief environmental affairs correspondent for NBC News, moderated the event, which was held the same day the Japanese government raised the Fukushima reactor
disaster to 7 on the International
Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale, fanning doubts about the future of nuclear power — currently the leading zero - carbon energy
Nuclear and Radiological Event
Scale, fanning doubts about the future of
nuclear power — currently the leading zero - carbon energy
nuclear power — currently the leading zero - carbon energy source.
While it is clear that the Fukushima Daiichi
nuclear meltdown was a consequence of an earthquake and tsunami, like all
disasters, it was also the result of political, economic and social choices that created or exacerbated broad -
scale risks.
The study, aimed at quantifying the small -
scale circulation that can not be captured by satellite - based altimeter measurements or general circulation models, has immediate practical applications to help better predict the path of catastrophic pollutant events, such as from future oil spills or
nuclear disaster events.
For this reason,
nuclear reactors are designed with passive and active safeguards, and separate dedicated systems are used to identify and to neutralise possible faults which could lead to large -
scale disasters.
Nuclear disasters have potentially large -
scale and long - term consequences for people, environments, and economies around the globe.
One possible solution to quickly measure a population's exposure to radiation in the event of a
nuclear disaster or some other large -
scale leak of radioactive material — such as a so - called «dirty bomb» attack — would be to scan the body in places where that material is most readily absorbed.
Spurred by a series of
nuclear - power mishaps, starting with 2011's
disaster at Fukushima, large -
scale solar and wind plants now dot the country.
The report recommends that the
nuclear industry and organizations with emergency management responsibilities assess their preparedness for severe
nuclear accidents associated with offsite regional -
scale disasters.
On Feb. 11, 1985, the cover page of Forbes thundered, «The failure of the U.S.
nuclear power program ranks as the largest managerial
disaster in business history, a
disaster on a monumental
scale.
• Nearly three dozen US
nuclear power plants are inadequately protected against major flooding from an upstream dam failure, flooding that could easily lead to an accident on the
scale of the 2011 Fukushima
Disaster.
Prior to the Fukushima
disaster that followed the 2011 tsunami, Japan shuttered its
nuclear generation fleet, leading in part to the 2012 introduction of the feed - in tariff policy for solar, the primary beneficiary of which to date has been the utility -
scale solar (known as «megasolar» in Japan) sector.
concluded that it makes clear «that international
nuclear agencies and some national authorities remain in denial about the
scale of the health
disasters in their countries due to Chernobyl's fallout.
Nearly three dozen
nuclear power plants are inadequately protected against major flooding guaranteed to occur after an upstream dam failure — flooding that could easily lead to an accident or meltdown on the
scale of the 2011
nuclear power
disaster in Fukushima, Japan.