Sentences with phrase «scale outcome evaluation»

This represents a rare opportunity for organisations, funders and schools to gain a better understanding of the effectiveness of an intervention for vulnerable young people through a large - scale outcome evaluation.

Not exact matches

The focus of each monitoring and evaluation plan is to determine whether Commonwealth environmental water is achieving the outcomes expected of it at the local and Basin scale.

We believe this scale holds particular promise if used as a measure in multivariate research and evaluation efforts that investigate outcome expectations alongside other constructs to understand public engagement comprehensively.

The major AIR evaluation found that 21 of 24 models showed no significant impact on learning, and the RAND study of results in scale - up jurisdictions revealed equally uninspiring outcomes.

Mathematica conducted an independent, five - year evaluation for the KIPP Foundation to assess KIPP's effectiveness at improving student outcomes on a larger scale under the i3 grant.

This evaluation has demonstrated the feasibility and benefits of using a large - scale, multisite random assignment research design to determine the impact of Career Academies on student outcomes.

Because our designs are sensitive to the relationship between classroom practice, policy, and targeted learning outcomes, we can successfully scale up our learning model - based research to create innovative assessment, learning, and evaluation systems for every age and type of program.

«Commission a full - scale third party evaluation of the entire accountability system focused on educator responses and student outcomes.»

(1.3) Subsection (1.4) applies if an insured person is under the age of 16 years at the time of the accident and none of the Glasgow Coma Scale, the Glasgow Outcome Scale or the American Medical Association's Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 4th edition, 1993, referred to in clause (1.2)(e), (f) or (g) can be applied by reason of the age of the insured person.

Note: If an insured person is under the age of 16 years at the time of the accident and none of the Glasgow Coma Scale, the Glasgow Outcome Scale or the American Medical Association's Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 4th edition, 1993, referred to in sections (6), (7) and (8) of the above criteria, can be applied by reason of the age of the insured person, then an impairment sustained in an accident by the insured person that can reasonably be believed to be a catastrophic impairment shall be deemed to be the impairment that is most analogous to the impairment referred to in sections (6), (7) and (8) of the above criteria, after taking into consideration the developmental implications of the impairment.

Reviews of policies and curricula pertaining to sexuality education have shown that while many countries have established curricula, little is known about their use in schools — the degree of implementation, the mode and quality of the instruction, the existence of program monitoring and evaluation tools, the adequacy and quality of teacher training, the level of support for or opposition to the subject, and the effectiveness of existing programs in achieving desired knowledge and behavioral outcomes among students.28 — 33 Small - scale reviews of school - based programs run by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) have been conducted in Kenya, but there has not been a review of the government's sexuality education program in schools.34, 35

Secondary outcomes: thoughts, feelings and behaviour (Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time scale (BESOT)-RRB-; positive and negative disposition (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)-RRB-; Beck Depression Inventory (BDI); Symptom Checklist -90-Revised (SCL90R);...

Measurements were two questions from the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders patient questionnaire, both the long and short forms of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, both the long and short forms of the Beck Depression Inventory, the Symptom - Driven Diagnostic System for Primary Care, the Medical Outcomes Study depression measure, and the Quick Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

Importantly, states were required to spend at least three - quarters of the federal funds on home visiting models that met federal standards of evidence - based effectiveness.1 As many policy scholars have noted, that a national initiative brought the importance of evidence - based practice to the forefront of public policy is a triumph for social science and demonstrates the importance of rigorous program evaluation.2 With that triumph, however, comes a responsibility to ensure that the public's expectations for success of these programs are consistent with what researchers understand about the empirical evidence — will the same positive outcomes found in programs» randomized controlled trials emerge when those programs are taken to scale?

She currently works on MIHOPE, a large - scale evaluation that assesses the effects of home visiting programs on maternal and child health outcomes, child maltreatment, and school readiness.

She is currently working on the implementation research and impact analyses for the Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation (MIHOPE), a large - scale national evaluation of home visiting programs that intend to prevent child maltreatment and improve maternal and child health, parenting skills, and child developmentEvaluation (MIHOPE), a large - scale national evaluation of home visiting programs that intend to prevent child maltreatment and improve maternal and child health, parenting skills, and child developmentevaluation of home visiting programs that intend to prevent child maltreatment and improve maternal and child health, parenting skills, and child development outcomes.

It is a large - scale evaluation designed to investigate the features of local programs and of home visitation that lead to improved birth outcomes and reduced health care costs for expectant families enrolled in Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP).

MIECHV is an unprecedented scale - up of evidence - based home visiting models across the country, with each including a thoughtful evaluation to generate knowledge about how to most effectively implement home visiting programs that produce positive outcomes.

Increasingly, in complex public health evaluation research, there are questions about whether all relevant benefits can be captured in a single summary outcome measure such as QALY or unit of «effectiveness» or net benefit approach17 which is why the use of a cost - consequence analysis (CCA) framework is being recommended for such economic evaluations.18 Other outcomes from the trial such as the Parent — Infant Relationship Global Assessment Scale (an observational measure that is independently rated blind to group allocation) will be included in the CCA so that all costs and outcomes from the trial can be displayed transparently for decision - makers to consider trade - offs themselves.