The numerical rating
scale pain scores were significantly lower after the S2 stimulation than after the S1 / M1 (p = 0.0071) or the sham (p = 0.0187) stimulations.
Not exact matches
The Faces
Pain Scale was initially developed to assess pain in pediatric patients and consists of 6 faces ranging from an expression representing no pain (scale score = 0) to worst possible pain (scale score
Scale was initially developed to assess
pain in pediatric patients and consists of 6 faces ranging from an expression representing no
pain (
scale score = 0) to worst possible pain (scale score
scale score = 0) to worst possible
pain (
scale score
scale score = 5).
And their average
pain score on a
scale of zero (no
pain) to 10 (the worst
pain imaginable) was five.
Mean
score for
pain using a visual analogue
scale (VAS) decreased from 5.0 to 2.9, with 13 patients reporting being
pain free after OMT.
From an initial
pain score of about 7 on a 10 - point
scale,
pain ratings at one month were about 3 in the CRFA group versus 4 in the steroid group.
Women had higher average
pain scores than men: 6.8 versus 6.1, on a
scale of 0 to 10.
Individuals from these species all
scored five on the
pain scale.
To gauge the level of
pain inflicted by each species, the researchers offered their own forearms, and
scored each bite according to a five - point
scale, ranging from «could not pinch skin», to «sharper unpleasant
pain and capable of breaking skin if persistent».
The rodents showed significantly fewer signs of
pain (an average of a 36 % lower
score on the grimace
scale) when a male researcher was in the room than when a female researcher — or no researcher at all — was there.
When asked to
score their
pain on a
scale of 1 to 10, 289 of them rated it as a 7 or higher.
The completed questionnaire responses were transformed into
scores (
scale 0 6) corresponding to each of four domains: vitality, emotional disturbance, anxiety, and
pain.
In addition, this questionnaire presents good test — retest reliability, even for testing after 6 months (correlation coefficients from 0.60 to 0.90, except for bodily
pain (0.43)-RRB-.53 Finally, the SF - 36 is sensitive to change, 57 with a difference of 5 points in
scale scores being clinically significant, as suggested by Ware et al. 58
A
pain intensity
score was calculated by averaging three ratings for
pain intensity (current
pain, average
pain, and worst
pain in the past 6 months) each on a
scale from «0» (no
pain) to «10» (worst imaginable
pain).
The mean
pain intensity
score on a Likert
scale ranging from 0 to 10 was 7.30 (SD = 1.51) and the average disability in ICPs was 7.23 (SD = 1.09).
2 Multiple regression analyses after controlling for age, sex, and duration of
pain: correlates of Depression Anxiety Stress
Scales depression
scores
Pain distress: the distress caused by patients»
pain over the past week was assessed on a zero to 10 numerical rating
scale, with higher
scores indicating greater
pain distress.19
This subset of
scales from the FES and their composite
score has been used with families of children with asthma, diabetes, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, recurrent abdominal
pain, sickle cell disease, and those undergoing bone marrow transplant (BMT).