Sentences with phrase «scale problems over»

Based on the results of the utmost skill and dedication we can muster devoted to the first 500 plants, another 3,500 would mean something like 16 additional roughly TMI / Chernoybl - scale problems over the lifespan of those hypothetical plants.

Not exact matches

In developing their resilience scale, the researchers highlighted traits such as being a good problem - solver, having control over your emotions, being able to maintain a feeling of optimism and a feeling of self - efficacy.

CBO talks shutdown: The Congressional Budget Office Chief Douglas Elmendorf says a government shutdown would damage the economy and «scale up» problems over time.

«The problem with the payment of the allowance is that apart from the huge cost implication for the national budget, it also compels governments over the years to scale down the number of students entering into the college of education.»

France's huge appetite for psychotropics has emerged over the past decade, but the scale of the problem has only recently been revealed.

In addition, the Earth faces much more significant problems over this time scale.

Our approach is focused on understanding the fundamental physical and chemical processes relevant to this problem over a range of temporal and spatial scales.

There's a battle inside your digestive system for control over your food's energy and there are so many factors that can tip the scales toward weighty problems or a healthy longevity.

Interweaving the relative time scale with the atomic time scale poses certain problems because only certain types of rocks, chiefly the igneous variety Free Online Dating process is an exciting chance to meet people from all over the world for love and marriage.

The problem is that after over 13 years of this approach there's little success to point to on a national scale.

Many Asian entrepreneurs whom we have talked to over the past decade plus had lamented their problems in scaling up their business to get a decent valuation beyond the billion - dollar market capitalization barrier.

Sure you can create pocket communities of no kill shelters, but unless those efforts show up as an over all reduction in kill rate on a national scale, it just means the problem is being handed to someone else.

In an effort to make a greater impact to help the companion animals in Anne Arundel County, Rude Ranch is moving forward to implement a large scale spay and neuter clinic, «The Spay Spa & Neuter Nook», to get ahead of the over population problem.

Their work encompasses a range of problems and time scales: from five - day model predictions of hurricane track and intensity, to understanding the causes of changes in extremes over the past century, to building new climate prediction models for seamless predictions out to the next several years, to earth system model projections of human - caused changes in various extremes (heat waves, hurricanes, droughts, etc.) over the coming century.

What kind of catastrophe can not be predicted, but numerous candidates have been discussed in this book: ecological collapses of various kinds, large - scale crop failures due to ecological stress or changes in climate and leading to mass famine; severe resource shortages, which could lead either to crop failures or to social problems or both; epidemic diseases; wars over diminishing resources; perhaps even thermonuclear war.»

Funny you picked 10 and 50 years as your example periods; it seems at least some of your colleagues disagree on the predictability problem over various time - scales (Klimazwiebel survey results).

Yet there is huge uncertainty over whether it will be possible to deploy them quickly — and at scale — without causing knock - on environmental and social problems.

The issue is the time of the year, latitude and type.The Krakatoa problem is well known eg Stenchikov 2006 ie that the models over estimate the global forcing.Hansen suggested that the observations were incorrect, however the Giss model gets the AO sign incorrect and arctic central temps incorrect in scale and time so.This is due to the incorrect heteregenous chemistry at high latitudes eg chapter3 WMO 2003, Ozone assessment 2011.

The scale of the time and problem is much more amenable to human thought: perhaps 1.5 K increase to a doubling of CO2 over 70 years; the rest of the change to happen gradually over a span of 1 — 4 millenia.

Seems unlikely to make much difference over large scale averages but wouldn't this be a potential problem for accurate reproduction of more intricate details like seasonal or diurnal cycles in individual grid cells or regions?

It is exactly the same problem as with the pre-Mauna Loa historical CO2 data: scattered all over the scale, unreliable due to accuracy of the instruments, personal skill, calibration, time and place of sampling...

But planning for disasters of this scale has to be a federal problem or we will be needlessly duplicating expertise and planning all over the country.

The purpose of the Bali conference, Young wrote in the preface to the program was «to distill and harvest... major scientific findings generated over almost a decade, explore the policy relevance of these findings, and engage in dialogue about future directions of research on the roles institutions play both in causing and addressing large - scale environmental problems.»

Over the years, bitcoin has had other hard forks that were specifically designed to solve its scaling problem.

Data from over 900 participants indicates that individuals higher on these dimensions were better at conflict management and resolution, were more dedicated to the relationship, had more self - control, had more positive interactions, and were more satisfied.2 That is, individuals who score higher on this scale should be able to control their impulses (i.e., avoid kissing random people behind their partner's back), they should pick up on signs of relationship problems earlier, and should more carefully weigh the pros and cons of starting a long - term relationship, or deciding to move in together.

Amongst the difficulty scales, on all but conduct problems, over 80 % of children return scores within the accepted normal range, that is the range in which most children would be expected to score.

Each item was responded to on a five point Likert scale ranging from 0 = almost never to 4 = almost always, and mothers were asked to indicate how different issues, such as «Disagreement over household rules» or «We undermine each other» had been a problem for her and her partner over the last month.

Children in the treatment group showed significant improvement over waitlisted children in behavior problem and intensity scales, according to both mother and father reports on the ECBI.

Parenting interventions that are delivered during this developmental period are necessary in order to capture the groups of youth and families (i) currently experiencing problems, but who did not receive an intervention during early childhood; (ii) those who received an intervention in early childhood, but who continue to experience problems and (iii) those who are not currently experiencing problems, but are at risk for developing problems later in adulthood.7 In Steinberg's 2001 presidential address to the Society for Research on Adolescence, a concluding remark was made for the need to develop a systematic, large - scale, multifaceted and ongoing public health campaign for parenting programmes for parents of adolescents.8 Despite the wealth of knowledge that has been generated over the past decade on the importance of parents in adolescent development, a substantial research gap still exists in the parenting literature in regards to interventions that support parents of adolescents.

Social communication problems of children over time, as reported by parents on the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS).

We considered the child to have potential for «behaviour problems» if the SDQ score was in the extreme 10 % of the distribution of scores over the whole MCS cohort at ages 3, 5 and 7 years [29], i.e. the top decile for the total difficulties scale (17 +, 14 +, 15 +) and the bottom decile for the prosocial scale (< = 5, < = 6, < = 6) respectively.