Sentences with phrase «scale score points»

The y axis should represent the full range of scale score points from 0 to 500 for reading and math.

The scores here are a little confusing so let me explain: The numbers you see are how many scale score points away from «meeting standards» the students are.

At the 4th grade level in math and reading, D.C. students gained 6 scale score points between 2007 and 2009, while the average gain in the other districts was only 1 point and 2.2 points, respectively.

For example, in 2013 (the most recent NAEP data) African American students in Massachusetts scored 277 on the 8th grade NAEP mathematics assessment, 14 scale score points above the national average for African Americans.

Scholarship students who were still attending private schools in the third year of the evaluation gained an average of more than 7 scale score points in reading from the program.

At the 4th - grade level, D.C. students in math and reading gained 6 scale score points between 2007 and 2009, while the average gain in the other 10 cities for which comparable data are available was only 1 point and 2.2 points, respectively.

The mathematics literacy score of 470 represented a statistically significant decline of 11 scale score points from the 481 scored in 2012, but U.S. performance in all three subjects — math, reading, and science — was not statistically significantly different from how the nation performed when each subject was first administered.

At age nine, the gap on the NAEP - LTT declined from 13 scale score points in 1971 to five points in 2012.

Especially when one considers that students who used their scholarship in year 1 needed to adjust to a new and different school environment, the reading impacts of using a scholarship of 1.4 scale score points (not significant) in year 1, 4.0 scale score points (not significant) in year 2, and 5.3 scale score points (significant) in year 3 suggest that students are steadily gaining in reading performance relative to their peers in the control group the longer they make use of the scholarship.

In 2015, the average was 282, a gain of 19 scale score points.

We were up this year in three of four grade / subject areas, with fourth - grade reading scores climbing five scale score points.

The within - country difference between teachers who include reasoning tasks in every lesson versus teachers who only present them in some lessons is only 14 scale score points in Japan and 19 points in the U.S. Indeed, even if 100 % of U.S. teachers had said they emphasize reasoning in every lesson — and the 514 TIMSS score for the category held firm — the achievement gap between the two countries would only contract negligibly.

The standard error of measurement at this achievement level was 15 scale score points.

[T] he range of teacher effectiveness covering the 5th to the 95th percentiles (73 scaled score points) represents approximately a 5.5 point change in the raw score (i.e., 5.5 of 52 total possible points

While the country saw modest gains of 1 scale score point and 3 scale score points in fourth and eighth grade reading, respectively, there was no change to overall scale scores in either grade for mathematics from 2009 to 2017.

The change of 20 and 30 scale score points, respectively, by Arizona charter eighth graders is especially laudable, as no state even came close to posting similar gains during that same timeframe.

The data presented to you within the LCAPs were minimal, cherry picked, and aligned with a state accountability gambit of spreading the scale score points around.