Not exact matches
Lower environmental footprint - due to economies of
scale,
less water and
energy used than cloth diapers laundered at home, no impact to landfill when compared to disposable diapers
I noted that I agree with him on the time
scale of
energy transitions (which is why I've supported domestic drilling while we still
use oil, rather than exporting the hazards to places
less able or willing to safeguard lives and the environment).
If we start
using electric cars in large numbers (and I hope we do soon), then solar towers and various other forms of large
scale clean electricity generation may supply a substantial fraction of our transport
energy, especially for short local runs
less than 100 klms a day.
Using the Solar Estimate calculator, we determined that given an average monthly utility bill of $ 150, the owner of a two - bedroom home on Montagu Street in Charleston's up -
scale 29401 zip code should produce around 9,890 kilowatt - hours (kWh) of emissions - free renewable
energy over its useful life; resulting in an estimated net profit (
energy cost savings
less the cost of equipment and installation) to the homeowner of $ 57,878 over 25 years.
Thirty years to establish a climate state seems a long time, as within that period there may be notable shifts to a number of different prevailing patterns of cold / warmth / wet or drought that, on a human
scale affects agriculture and horticulture by impacting on what crops may be grown successfully, may affect the tourism season, may cause a consumer to
use more or
less energy in their home, and also impact on nature by affecting the populations of wild life and vegetation.
[M] any people have latched onto the local - food movement, billing themselves «locavores,» as an antidote to the
energy used to transport food long distances and the
energy intensity of large -
scale industrialized agriculture... Strangely enough, shipping food thousands of miles can sometimes require
less energy, emit
less carbon dioxide and do
less environmental damage.
The report released last week
uses deeply flawed assumptions to inaccurately paint coal (and to a
lesser extent, fuel oil) as the savior that prevented large -
scale blackouts during the extreme cold, while greatly understating the contribution from renewable
energy sources.
There is
less to clean,
less energy that is
used in smaller homes, and it's easier to furnish homes that are not on a grande
scale.