This is not only good for those who have pets as their responsibility; it also means that issues which might otherwise take up
scarce public resources through the regulatory or lawmaking process are handled long before they become problems.
Not exact matches
The more scientists and journalists talk, the more likely it is that the
public —
through the media — will appreciate what science can (and can not) offer as society grapples with difficult questions about how to invest
scarce resources.
So how does a case like this wend its way
through our clogged system, squandering
scarce judicial and community
resources, while no one watches the
public purse?