So, are
these scary model predictions reliable, and should we be worried?
Not exact matches
Any carbon dioxide emissions that may contribute to global warming — and recent climate
modelling puts earlier
scary predictions into question — have plateaued.
I think it's a case of taking a wild hypothesis, building a highly speculative
model from it, generating some
scary and dramatic
predictions for the media, with the * specific * aim of raising public alarm and getting some political action.
in re: The
model study in Nature Climate change: The rhetoric from these failed climate scientists is always the same: «We're wrong, but we» rel important and you have to take us and our
scary predictions seriously.»
The tripling is not to get to the
scary scenarios, but just to get to the mean
model prediction and what comes out of the observational studies, both instrumental and paleo.
Like pretty much every paper ever published by the climate alarmism industry, all the
scary predictions are merely projections based on
modeled scenarios dependent on so many dubious assumptions that their conclusions are objectively worthless.