Sentences with phrase «scenarios describe plausible»

Not exact matches

The assessments in this chapter are based on the climate trends for which we had sufficient data and climate projections that represent plausible future scenarios, as described in the Climate chapter of this assessment (see Water chapter for snowpack trends and projections) and summarized in Table 4 - 1.
The analysis in the Forest chapter is based on the climate trends for which we had sufficient data and climate projections that represent plausible future scenarios, as described in the Climate chapter.
The fundamental forms of science assessment that result in learning addressed by the assessment component include the following student outcomes: (a) identifying, constructing, or distinguishing between of examples illustrating the presence or absence of a concept in everyday scenarios, (b) predicting or describing how to produce a specific outcome in everyday scenarios, based upon knowledge of concept relationship (s), and (c) explaining plausible reasons for an occurrence based upon prior knowledge of relevant concept relationships (i.e., abductive reasoning).
Incremental scenarios describe techniques where particular climatic (or related) elements are changed incrementally by plausible though arbitrary amounts (e.g., +1, +2, +3, +4 °C change in temperature).
Scenario B is described as «most plausible» which is expected to be closest to reality.
This somewhat contradicts «on the high side of reality» in Hansen (2006) in which Scenario B is described as «most plausible
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z