Not exact matches
We discuss client
scenarios, discuss marketing strategies,
talk about the latest sleep research, offer each other resources, share documents, and so
much more!
Trailers: «You're Next,» «Wolverine,» «White House Down:» The very first trailer for the
much talked about «You're Next» has arrived and it certainly rocks the power to rouse just as
much curiosity as the nonstop word of mouth with its wicked beat and effective spin on the home invasion
scenario.
In all of these
scenarios, the marginal cost of production is not going to be even $ 1 for a trade paperback and will rarely be over $ 1.50 for a trade hardcover (obviously the last big brick Harry Potter novels cost a teeny bit more due to sheer volume of paper needed to print a 750 page novel, but not * that *
much more), meaning that if we're
talking marginal cost of production as the difference in price between a paperback and an ebook, we're not
talking about a huge difference in price.
Of course, the collapse
scenario I was
talking is potentially one pathway to Killian's RG society: folks who see this coming band together, learn / develop skills that are better adapted, survive the crash
much better than most, and are then in a position to promote their culture.
I focused my time on a fascinating series of
talks related to emissions
scenarios, how various commitments address the actual problem of global warming and how
much money will be needed for which technologies (stay tuned).
Take Hansen's
much -
talked - about - paper from, 1988 which contained 3
scenarios....
«For future climate, I was
talking about a demonstrator we have for European wine, where we can really see that if we don't curb emissions and if we go into a high - emissions
scenario, then wine production will be very
much affected,» Vamborg says.
We have heard
much talk of creating new terminology for our eco-discussions and «Carbon Positive», instead of the stock term Carbon Neutral, seems more upbeat, moving past the doom + gloom
scenarios.
The very
much talked about G20 summit that took place in Buenos Aires, Argentina last week has been delivering a number of news about the cryptocurrency
scenario.
Are you
talking about registrants who advocate, thus, who try to «influence» a client regarding how
much said client should offer as an initial deposit within an initial APS, or, are you describing a
scenario whereby a registrant, after a client decides for himself / herself the amount of an initial deposit (without input from said registrant) advocates on behalf of said client why said deposit amount has been included within said APS?