Sentences with phrase «sceptical scientists on»

I liked Titley quite a lot but couldn't understand why he seemed to be the «go to» guy as I didn't think he had as much technical knowledge of climate as the three sceptical scientists on the panel.

Not exact matches

Yet other researchers contacted by New Scientist remain sceptical: «My take on...

«The Republican Sarah Palin and her officials in the Alaskan state government drew on the work of at least six scientists known to be sceptical about the dangers and causes of global warming...»

In a congressional meeting room, somewhere on Capitol Hill, one of the world's leading sceptical climate scientists, Dr. Tim Ball, is toasting the advent of the Trump administration.

On several occasions Prof Stewart offers his commiserations to the defeated sceptical scientist with the words» you have to feel sorry for him really».

The term is generally used in a derogatory way, so some politicians (e.g. Steve Fielding) and scientists (e.g. Stewart Franks) even if they are genuinely sceptical of the consensus view on AGW, -LSB-...]

We found it difficult to understand why the BBC had not sought out and conducted lengthy interviews with some of the very many reputable scientists who are sceptical about the impact of CO2 and mankind on the global climate.

I an a naturally sceptical person, but my scepticism of global warming was cemented before I really knew what it was all about by a headline in the South China Morning Post saying that 2500 scientists had signed off on catastrophic global warming.

Science is by its nature sceptical: scientists interrogate information and only on repeated investigation does data become science.

Moreover, by applying the term «denial» (with all its loaded undertones) to sceptical scientists; by referring to them inaccurately as «well funded» by the oil industry; and by likening those who stress the uncertainties of climate science to unprincipled lobbyists for tobacco companies, Lord May enters on the field of personal vilification — not a suitable place for a distinguished former President of the Royal Society.

Notwithstanding Lord Monckton's very excellent (instant) reasoning powers, my first choice for the «non-believers» in AGW would be Anthony Watts because he clearly has access to all the information he needs at his fingertips + he would be able to call on a lot of sceptical scientists, without reserve, including Lord Monckton I'm sure, should he not be sure about his answers.

Why on earth should one be sceptical of unbiased, rigorous science when it's in the hands of openly partisan scientists?!!!

Andrew Montford's observation comes in response to an article by Gavin Schmidt, in which he apparently shows more reflection on the problems of science and advocacy than I would have expected, given his robust statements about «deniers», and his refusal to debate with more sceptical climate scientists in the past, and his impatience with his scientific critics, to the delight of climate activists.

If you're feeling sceptical about the scale of this energy transformation, join the club — Nature ran an analysis by Shell scientists on the physical limits to deploying new technology last December, which is worth a read (again subscription required).

Since this book is written by a sceptical French climatoligist who has no connection to the oil industry or the various liberterian think tanks and who claims indisputably, that the «greenhouse effect or global warming scenario is a myth» fostered on the general public by so called scientists, I would be very interested in hearing your rebuttal, because I am still in the process of forming an informed opinion.

Hence the recent Harrabin Q&A session giving prominence to past temperature change and and the Guardian series on the CRU hack leading with a profile of Steve McIntyre and going on to discuss the supposed suppression of sceptical science by climate scientists.

But it is curious that the No Scientist chose the headline Sceptical climate scientists concede Earth has warmed, and then goes on to quote a number of sceptics, each of whom seem to have told the article's author, Michael Marshall that the warming was never in question.