Sceptics say concerns over the security of client data make SaaS offerings in general unfit for use in the legal industry.
Ancient trees dragged from frozen Siberian bogs do not undermine climate science, despite what
the sceptics say
But on the topic of what «climatologists» and
sceptics say, the latter by and large are not in dispute with what you say «climatologists» say — not in principle.
You know the satellite temperatures
the sceptics say are all important.
Sometimes
sceptics say things like «the models say the oceans should have boiled off by now, but they haven't, so the models are trash».
However,
sceptics say that the necessary French infrastructure isn't there yet in the form of adequate MP3 and video content, and a thriving market in apps.
Sceptics say a] Peugeot should be careful with the pit - release lollipop, and b] if you slow down, a damaged tyre won't take half the car with it.
Sceptics say it would be impossible to use mirrors to keep...
Sahar Danesh, Principal Policy Advisor for Manufacturing at the Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET), said: «This is great news for economic growth and shows that, contrary to what
some sceptics say, the UK is shining in manufacturing.
But
sceptics say the mechanism is an unregulated way for struggling startups to raise money from investors who might not know any better.
Sceptics said that the shapes were ambiguous and that the molecules could have been formed at temperatures of 650 °C or so.
Or my inner
sceptic says this.
I totally agree Jennifer; when the issue theme was «Global Warming»
sceptics said NO, the climate is always changing.
Scottish
sceptic says: «I realised HACRUT couldn't be trusted, when I found out that phil Jones couldn't use a spreadsheet»
In that 11 years I've yet to hear
a sceptic say those words, but I've heard many, many alarmists, both scientists and non-scientists, insist that it's so.
Scottish
Sceptic says: November 15, 2013 at 8:21 pm I've checked and anyone can make anyone a professor,.
Sceptics said the survey wrongly omitted thousands of papers which did not give a view.
«''»»» Scottish
Sceptic says: February 28, 2011 at 2:56 pm «Other aspects that control the temperature range at the surface of the Earth are at least as important and they include convection (winds, storms, etc.) and precipitation that transfer a great deal of energy from the surface to the higher levels of the Atmosphere.»
Not exact matches
Many
sceptics believe we are in the middle of a new Bitcoin bubble while advocates
say we are just beginning to see the rise starting.
«A true believer needs no evidence; a true
sceptic will accept no evidence,»
says Whanger.
A senior clergyman is reported as having
said in a sermon that «the elevation of the Bible to close on divine status has done more damage to the Christian message than all the slings and arrows of the
sceptics.
The writing throughout is very accessible, and any Tolkien fan will enjoy reading it, but I suspect it would not persuade a
sceptic to take LOTR seriously, nor do I think the author is
saying anything particularly unique.
What's your message to
sceptics who
say filling a stadium for a Christian event like this just isn't possible anymore?
A fellow atheist blogger, however, on his site The Heathen Hub (http://heathen-hub.com/blog.php?b=344) revealed that she is actually «one of... the atheist movement's footsoldiers», and quotes her as
saying that she is «really tired of
sceptics who are committed to investigating and criticising irrationality unless that irrationality is of the religious sort....
«I think that the
sceptics or cynics would
say that he isn't a standout character and put a negative spin on it.
Always known as a Corbyn -
sceptic, he releases a statement
saying he believes it is «time for the party to unite behind a new leader» and serve as an «effective opposition».
This suggests that Leavers are wrong when they
say the Brexit vote was a reasonable response to «open borders» or «mass immigration», or that a post-Brexit reduction in migration is likely to sate the
sceptics.
Speaking at a press conference which was organised by the APC, Dr. Hassan Ayariga
said that now «The Storm is over» and the question on the lips of
sceptics as to whether he Dr. Hassan Ayariga could form and lead a Political Party now belong to History.
I would
say incremental obduracy would be the best way to go, get us the best deal and (if you are interested...) would reflect the broadly Euro -
sceptic but small c Conservative views of the British.
The Deputy Leader of UKIP Lord Monckton of Brenchley, a well known
sceptic on climate change, wrote to the Telegraph today
saying of the prince:
the views of working class voters, we needed to get back from UKIP were socially Conservative, against Neo liberalism and EU
sceptic, the views of Maurice Glasman's Blue Labour, Glasman in the Mail on Sunday http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3693947/We-crisis-new-party-doomed-says-leading-Labour-peer-LORD-GLASMAN.html has now
said a break away party would be a mistake.
For some MPs, that's the top priority - but one leading euro -
sceptic backbencher, Mark Pritchard,
said there was no immediate pressure on Mr Cameron.
Professor Frank Chambers, Head of the University of Gloucestershire's Centre for Environmental Change and Quaternary Research, who led the writing of the Fast - Track Research Report,
said: «Both
sceptics and adherents of Global Warming might draw succour from this work.
The researchers
said that their method of attaining fusion in a vacuum chamber can be replicated with «100 per cent accuracy», but the reports have failed to convince the
sceptics.
«Climate
sceptics like to criticize climate models for getting things wrong, and we are the first to admit they are not perfect, but what we are finding is that the mistakes are being made by those models which predict less warming, not those that predict more,»
said Prof. Sherwood.
«People didn't believe it,»
says Ryan, admitting that he, too, was one of the
sceptics.
But advocates of the comet - blast theory
say they will present their own new data at the American Geophysical Union (AGU) meeting in San Francisco, where they will share the stage with
sceptics.
I would
say most climate
sceptics take the «soft» view, but their rhetoric can sometimes make it appear that they hold the «hard» view.
As you
say, the work of
sceptics should not be suppressed out of hand; it is after all by careful and impartial scrutiny that science advances.
In 2008, climate change
sceptic Roger Pielke Sr
said this: «Global warming, as diagnosed by upper ocean heat content has not been occurring since 2004».
This ideal is easier
said than done: for some
sceptics the definition of «collaboration» would seem to be «the suppression of mutual loathing in pursuit of government funding», when faced with the reality of forced collaboration or reluctant leadership.
Without further ado, therefore, we hereby introduce you to a colossal debate of expert opinion between Professor Wu — amphibious philosophical mastermind and all - round fan of Steiner's work; and Tom Andrews — NITRB's resident book reviewer and human being, and some may
say a «Steiner -
sceptic» (at least, for now...).
If you look at the climate
sceptics, I would have to
say honestly, what standard are they being held to?
Or when the
sceptics, rather than
saying that this or that piece of the science seems wrong,
says it is all a scam and a hoax and there is nothing correct about the professed science, the
sceptics arguments can now be discarded.
[Further Response: It's also worth pointing out what Chu
says a little later on: «If you look at the climate
sceptics, I would have to
say honestly, what standard are they being held to?
The Alaskan Governor's submission on this subject even cited a «letter» (non peer reviewed, not scientific) written by a group of
sceptics (willie soon, david legates, sallie baliunas) and part funded by ExxonMobil, which
says that global warming isn't happening, therefore the bears are not under threat.
Even if this paper concerns the sink and not the sources the same
sceptics can
say that we must know all the fluxes to make a correct CO2 balance.
«Senator, you
said something that caught my attention in your remarks, that the person who had become a
sceptic, a converted
sceptic — you
said that he made the statement that global warming was 100 % due to human activity.
Sceptics who
say its driven by solar activity have not produced evidence of this.
Why is it that climate
sceptics have been going on about the Urban Heat Island * being the cause of the observed temperaure increase found in the global averages, if, as you
say, there is no increase in the global averages?