Not exact matches
The survey also found that one in five teachers did not know what the main priorities for their pupil premium
funding was, with early intervention
schemes cited as the most common priority for spending, identified by 28 per cent of
respondents.
The
funds in which the
respondents invested turned out to be a Ponzi
scheme and the
respondents lost their investments.
The Australian Government
funds many elements of the native title system, including the «
respondent funding scheme», which can provide financial assistance to certain «non-claimant» parties to participate in native title proceedings.
Previous Native Title Reports have commented on the Commonwealth's
respondent funding scheme, 81 noting its effect in hardening the positions of those who already have their interests protected in any event, 82 and its seeming encouragement of litigation over negotiation.83 During the consultations, an NTRB in Queensland expressed frustration at the inequality created when mining and other companies are financed directly by the Attorney - General, putting NTRBs (and therefore the traditional owners they represent), with limited
funding as described above, at a disadvantage when appearing in arbitration hearings about the doing of future acts.
One part of the
funding is the «
respondent funding scheme» operated by the Attorney - General's Department.
The Australian National Audit Office found when it audited the
respondent funding scheme in the 2006 ‑ 2007 year16 (under the old guidelines), there was a concerning lack of data about how the
scheme is being administered and a resulting lack of analysis on its effectiveness and necessity.
4.2 That the Attorney - General (as part of the department's annual reporting) monitor, assess, and report on the
respondent funding scheme to determine the extent to which it meets the objects of the Native Title Act and how (if at all) it furthers the intent of the law as set out in the preamble.
It is necessary to consider how the
respondent funding scheme (outlined in Section 183 of the Native Title Act) has in fact impacted on proceedings.
In 2005, the Attorney - General announced that operation of the Section 183
respondent funding scheme would be changed to encourage agreement - making rather than litigation.
Subject to the Commission's recommendations for improving the transparency, accountability and operation of the
respondent funding scheme generally, the Commission supports the enactment of Schedule 4 to the Bill.
That Schedule 4 to the Bill (proposed s 213A) be amended to incorporate the eligibility criteria under the relevant Guidelines for the
scheme, particularly to clarify that a
respondent is not eligible for
funding:
The Commission considers that it is important to ensure that decisions made under this
scheme are appropriate and that
respondent parties
funded under the
scheme are not having a negative impact on the overall functioning of the native title
scheme.
Sometimes, the parties» participation is
funded by the Attorney - General under the
respondent funding scheme.
Expenditure for the
respondent funding scheme fell from $ 5.01 million in 2006 - 07 to $ 4.25 million in 2007 - 08.
Both NTRBs and some governments have indicated that one of the major benefits of the 2007 changes were those made to the
respondent funding scheme: [67]
Currently,
respondents may be
funded by the Commonwealth under the «
respondent funding scheme» to participate in native title proceedings.
The following summary of the Attorney - General's
funding for
respondents is drawn from information provided to the Senate Estimates Committee by the Attorney - General's Department (151) and from the Department's published Guidelines on the assistance
schemes:
These amendments included giving stronger powers to the National Native Title Tribunal, as well as changes to the native title registration test, the
respondent funding scheme and the way in which Native Title Representative Bodies and Prescribed Bodies Corporate function.
Under s 183 of the Native Title Act,
respondents may be
funded by the Commonwealth under the «
respondent funding scheme» to participate in native title proceedings.