Sentences with phrase «scheme of things with»

They show her marking her place in the natural scheme of things with pee.

The Bavarian - born coach has been praised previously for his attractive brand of football with Dortmund, and he may seamlessly fit into the scheme of things with Bayern, who are going through a mini-transition in the midfield department.

For he is really wanting to comprehend the total scheme of things with the mind of the Creator.

It carries no weight in the scheme of things with any rational and logical person.

Not exact matches

Let's start with the drawbacks on this one, because they are relatively few in the scheme of things.

While some people love cash because it's emotionally harder to part with than it is to hand over a card, in the grand scheme of things, credit and debit are usually better options.

Tesla's partnership with SolarCity is part of Musk's grand scheme of things, nicknamed «Master Plan, Part Deux.»

Explained Fogo de Chao CEO Larry Johnson in an interview at the ICR Conference Monday, «We serve a higher - income customer in Brazil — it's not that they are fully insulated from the economic downturn, but in the grand scheme of things they are still going to go out to business and family events — yes, we'll have some dip in results but we can deal with that.»

There are times that a single event, perhaps small in the scheme of things, can reflect a problem with our entire society.

And then, go home with the thought that because this love is a chemical construct of some sort (as thoughts involve chemistry) that this bond between you and your loved ones is as meaningless and hollow in the whole scheme of things as is the statement of a chemical equation.

«All the time not having a clue that they were being whispered against, campaigned against by both Catholics & Anglicans who made it palpably clear that this initiative was detrimental to the «dialogue towards unity» and temporarily compromised their positions as oecumenical ambassadors - that this was a counter-productive «wacked - out» scheme by an ailing Pope who merely needed to be placated until he died - hence delaying tactics, obfuscations, procedurality, red tape and making everything as difficult and administratively untenable as possible; with patronising sympathy and hand - wringing at their lot while sneering, dismissing and chuckling to themselves that the whole thing will eventually come to naught... that the administration will crumble via crises and power politics andpersonality clashes and outright frustration at the situation... and ultimately the Ordinariate will be re-integrated into the Conference system and those not happy about it will crawl back to their friends in the C of E.

This huge, blue planet is in existance just so we can be born, live, make a living, have a baby, then die... no connection, no spirit, no soul, no more appreciating the beauty around us, no more being astounded at the improbabilities, no more being amazed at the wonders of life... because none of that has any meaning any more, it's just a bunch of junk that happened accidently... who cares, we're just all going to fade away into nothingness... become one with the dirt, because we are actually no better than the dirt... I don't know about you, but I'm depressed now... but then that's what's great about our country, you can choose to believe or... not... in this... country... that has... no particular meaning... in the grand scheme of thngs... oh, yeah, that's right there is no «grand scheme of things»... so never mind.

Thus, the redemption of those with Down syndrome, for example, would consist not in some magical fix of the twenty - first chromosome but in the recognition of their central roles in the communion of saints and in the divine scheme of things.»

Pascal longed to build a home for human beings in the world he inherited, he burned «with desire to find solid ground and an ultimate sure foundation whereon to build a tower reaching to the Infinite» — that is, to construct a poem like that of Dante which would locate human being in the new scheme of things.

I parted ways with the Catholic Church in the 1960's over things like Purgatory (the best fund raising scheme ever invented), intercession with God by Mary and a pantheon of saints, Vatican supremacy, original sin, overly ritualized worship, confession, communion.

In this case it is the more naturalistic conditions of finitude, contingency, chance, and decay which take center stage in the general scheme of things, with mind being placed in the more subordinate, passive role of the «conditioned.»

They have confused «immortality of the soul» with whatever may be intended by the biblical phrase «resurrection of the body»; while theologians have attempted, as we have already observed, when I described the older scheme which comprised the last things, to bring the two conceptions together in a fashion which will retain each of them and yet relate them so that a consistent pattern may be provided.

In the grand scheme of things, we could end up with more spiritual kids than any of our married friends with biological kids.

Overall, i agree with the post and the comments, much of our modern day church could change, but let's not forget that certain pockets of individuals within the greater scheme of things ARE getting it and ARE making a difference.

On the contrary, I should claim, what I have been saying is metaphysical in the second sense of the word which I proposed in an earlier chapter; it is the making of wide generalizations on the basis of experience, with a reference back to verify or «check» the generalizations, a reference which includes not only the specific experience from which it started but also other experiences, both human and more general, by which its validity may be tested — and the result is not some grand scheme which claims to encompass everything in its sweep, but a vision of reality which to the one who sees in this way appears a satisfactory, but by no means complete, picture of how things actually and concretely go in the world.

Believers are emotional weaklings, unequipped to deal with the reality of the mortal world we exist in, so they bury their heads in a fallacy world where there exists order and «justice», but such things are the trivial vices of petty man who would lose their minds if they were ever made to accept the idea that in the grand scheme, nothing matters.

The traditional scheme of the last things will no longer serve us, I have said; yet that scheme did confront men with the Christian faith and it did make them face «reality» with honesty and humility.

Planners sit at desks and conference with one another endlessly in Washington and Brussels, working up grand schemes to be announced with much fanfare at international meetings of the rich before imposing the same old thing they've been imposing for decades on poor countries, whether the schemes help the poor or not.

It is more like some thing Blo - odline, Ra - cial, Zio - nism or New advanced Hi - tler tea - chings that gave a feel of superiority filled with ego & hatred over others that are not of same while we see that this scheme is heavily financed internationally for the system to confiscate lands of those considered outer of the Seal & Ring that gather and lead them!??

I don't agree with Ellul that accepting mediated security is a repudiation of our security in Christ, God often provides for his people indirectly; but I do think that fear / panic at the loss of these means is a repudiation of our trust / faith in God to provide either temporal or Eternal security for us, whichever he sees fit in his grand scheme of things.

If all «things are possible, there would then be a sufficient and rational accounting for the novelty within the universe in full accordance with the fundamental ontological principle of the categoreal scheme; the reason for novelty rests within actuality.

Scriptural references to these sexual practices, both before and after Leviticus, show God's displeasure with them whether or not any ceremony or idolatry is involved.Response # 2: Despite the UFMCC's contention that the word for abomination (toevah) is usually associated with idolatry, it in fact appears in Proverbs 6:16 - 19 in connection with sins having nothing to do with idolatry or pagan ceremony: There are six things the LORD hates, seven that are detestable [an abomination or toevah] to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked schemes, feet that are quick to rush into evil, a false witness who pours out lies and a man who stirs up dissension among brothers.Idolatry plays no part in these scriptures; clearly, then, toevah is not limited to idolatrous practices.Response # 3: If the practices in Leviticus 18 and 20 are condemned only because of their association with idolatry, then it logically follows they would be permissible if they were committed apart from idolatry.

The question may, of course, be raised as to whether the world is really inexhaustibly rich in possibilities or whether its appearance as such may be due merely to the relatively minor place man has in the whole scheme of things and to the magnitude and complexity of the world in comparison with man and his works.

I wrote a post for Living Litehouse about how, as Americans, we are blessed to live in a country with easy access to high - quality, fresh foods that are reasonably affordable in the scheme of things.

In fairness we've started poorly but in the grand scheme of things only City will be happy with their start out of the big guns.

Just the complicated one with Morse at center has more moving parts and more potential points of failure leading to a more Risk / Reward type scheme that needs other things in the offense to go well to keep the defense from heavily focusing on it.

Same thing with Minkah, a ballhawk free safety with range and instincts is the glue of a cover 3 and one of the most important positions in the scheme.

the problem is the complacency that has gotten hold of Wenger's brain due to lack of pressure from the top has infected the whole club... Wenger knows his job is as safe and forth knoxx so LOSING IS AN OPTION in the scheme of things, there is always another game to make things right, always another season to try again and this, whether consciously or otherwise is a malaise that has infected the player» a pysche... I have said this so many times, Fergie won the league with a squad that less than half the quality our present squad possess and in a tougher more competitive seaaon

To be fair, our fit players could really do with a rest after playing four matches in just 11 days so it certainly makes sense to ignore an unimportant match in the great scheme of things.

Arif Hasan has written that Billy Price and Isiah Wynn would both fit the Vikings» current blocking scheme perfectly, and the film I saw of Wynn told me the same thing, while Will Hernandez's film indicated to me, at least, that he would be more at home in the old, power - blocking system we ran with Adrian Peterson.

Though in the grand scheme of things now it's pretty underwhelming, at the time we were looking up at fourth with Tottenham looking out of reach with 12 - 15 pts ahead (I forget the number) our run as a result of this change was outstanding.

I hope I'm wrong but this could be the most damaging win when it comes to transfers... winning 1 game, after about 20 minutes of really good play, is of little consequence in the grand scheme of things... only those with the most selfish of intentions would suggest otherwise... the only reason we're even in this predicament, where were celebrating our first victory of 2018 against a bottom half squad who is managed by possibly the only individual more antiquated than our manager, is because of Wenger's ridiculous mishandling of his contract last year combined with his mishandling of the contracts of our top players this year; a fact that he himself admitted to... so before you get too excited about the possibilities of our current roster don't forget what has happened over the last several years and pray to the gods of football that real quality reinforcements like Auba are on the way, which could have happened years ago for less money and we might have been holding a trophy of some significance, or this brief respite will be followed by the usual mediocrity and stagnation

«We're already doing things with this defense that we didn't do all of last season,» Foley says of the scheme installed in 2004, when Wade Phillips became the new coordinator.

Aaron Ramsey returned to action with a substitute appearance in the home draw against Hull City last weekend, and he would be pivotal to Arsenal's scheme of things during the upcoming weekends.

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

I'd be reservedly happy with a 2 - 1 loss in the grand scheme of things, but I can see us coming away with a 1 - 1 draw, leaving all to play for at the Emirates in two weeks time.

This can be perceived and thought as very radical and extreme but in the grand scheme of things this would benefit the club as the purchases are young players who can be molded to the needs of the team unlike Ozil who has stagnated and is a one - dimensional playmaker with very less or no eye for a shot on goal.

And the right way to deal with it is the same way we deal with all temper tantrums — ignore it because, in the grand scheme of things, it's reactionary and emotional.

I smashed my remote into a million pieces earlier after the costa goal and had never been so frustrated, but Iv realized that there is no point getting so annoyed with individual games when the grand scheme of things is all wrong anyway, luck will never be on our side.

Tottenham's 1 - 1 draw with Brighton on Wednesday wasn't especially significant in the wider scheme of things.

The full - back positions also remain a concern with Antonio Valencia and Ashley Young approaching the final stages of their respective careers and the fans can expect some movement in the defensive scheme of things.

With Arsenal 3 - 0 up from the first leg, it is a game which is hard to get excited about, and this is probably why, in the grand scheme of all things Arsenal, it has been forgotten about.

Samir Nasri has become almost an icon for the Snood, no doubt whoever makes the silly things will be on the phone to his agent right now discussing a possible sponsorship / advertising scheme as the item is clearly going to be a favourite with the youngsters of the world, but if the Gunners don't perform at Old Trafford on Monday night then don't be at all surprised to see Nasri's Snood replaced by Arsene Wenger's hands which, according to my sources, has been all the rage in north London for years now.

Yes, bigger, because this time we are playing a club, bestowed with success throughout its history, added to by last week's Carling Cup victory; unlike last week, where we had to show Spu * s, where they stand in the scheme of things.

The Spanish keeper was taken off in the 93rd minute, and a delusional guy with «Polish» ed looks entered the grand scheme of things.