Sentences with phrase «scholars agree»

When discussing the relationship between character strengths and healthy growth, scholars agree that character strengths are a reflection of the family's and school's environmental characteristics; if these characteristics are positive, they can enhance students» ability to resist psychological stress.

While scholars agree that we have the Scots to thank for «argle - bargle,» there is some disagreement on when it was first used.

Other climate law scholars agree with Stern.

An upcoming book makes the provocative claim that Jackson Pollock spelled out his name in giant letters in his iconic Mural — but not all scholars agree.

Most contemporary scholars agree that Wood suffered an unhappy marriage because he was a closeted gay man, though no such words were uttered in Depression - era America.

Most scholars agree that Annie's death in 1851 had a profound impact on solidifying Darwin's religious doubts and in giving him the courage to publish ever bolder accounts of evolution that challenged the prevailing notions of «intellectual design.»

Most scholars agree that effective leadership is among the most important characteristics of good schools, equally important to powerful teaching.

Although most scholars agree that teachers represent the single most important school contributor to a student's academic progress, consensus breaks down as soon as the question turns to how best to design compensation systems to enhance teacher quality.

Scholars agree that gossip has evolved as an efficient way to learn more about others, and to enforce group norms.

Scholars agree that there was indeed a real battle that sent shock waves through the Roman Empire, which then stretched from the island of Britain to Egypt.

Most scholars agree that Isaac Newton, while formulating the laws of force and gravity and inventing the calculus in the late 1600s, probably knew all the science there was to know at the time.

But the scholars agree it is important to think about ways to limit the spread of misinformation, and they hope their result will encourage more research on the subject.

Most scholars agree that war is currently in decline.

Most scholars agree with Dix and his forerunners, B. E. Easton and notably R. H. Connolly, in assigning it to Hippolytus and differ only in the details of the reconstruction and preferred readings.

Almost all New Testament scholars agree that this saying is an abbreviation of a saying of Jesus that appears in its fuller form in Matthew 5:31 — 32 in the Sermon on the Mount.

Come on Chad, if a majority of scholars agree, as you claim, it should be easy for you to give me three sources that support your claim.

Nevertheless, there were other factors at work and most scholars agree that they played some role in shaping the particular form that the resurrection faith of Israel assumed, even though there is difference of opinion as to the extent to which they may have initiated it.

On the other hand, almost ALL actual scholars agree that John was based on neither Q nor Mark.

Books on jesus that all scholars agree were NOT written during his supposed life but many decades later.

I am sorry to disappoint you Ms. Atheist Sherron Teal, but the vast majority of the world's BEST scholars all agree that Jesus of Nazareth absolutely DID exist and there is plenty of evidence in the writings of ancient historians to prove it.

So, let's start with the first gospel written, as almost all scholars agree: the gospel of Mark.

We also learn in this preface that verse divisions in the Bible are «purely arbitrary» and «do not reflect the intentions of the original authors» (whoever they are) and that scholars agree that the «Book of J» is «the oldest strand in the Pentateuch.»

All debates aside, most scholars agree Tolkien was a deeply religious man.

A number of scholars agree with me in taking this mind - body view seriously, and admirers of Merleau - Ponty should take note of this.

Sallie McFague has written in her helpful book Speaking in Parables that the most significant parts of the New Testament consists of various parables:»... as New Testament scholars agree, the parables not only are Jesus» most characteristic form of teaching but are among the most authentic strata in the New Testament.»

Scholars agree that the New Testament portrait of Jews, and especially of Pharisees, is in large part distorted and inaccurate.

Most scholars agree and Jesus knew that this group of people did know the scriptures from mans point of view.

Scholars agree that the general structural form of what we now call the «ordained ministry» — according to which a particular person is given general oversight of all the activities of a particular Christian community — did not emerge in the church until early in the second century.

All scholars agree that it is certain that Thomas, Peter, and Judas did not actually write the «gospels» that bear their names.

Also, bear in mind King Josiah's reforms to the hebrew bible not to mention the convenient «discovery» of one of the lost books of Moses during his reign, ie Deuteronomy (which most scholars agree was not written in the time of «Moses»... provided Moses even existed... no evidence he or any of the Patriachs ever existed... except David) when you start to look at the evidence and history of judaism and christianity it becomes quite clear that these religions are not what they claim to be.

We must now turn our attention to the New Testament witness concerning the appearances of the exalted Christ, for most scholars agree that they constitute the oldest element in the New Testament tradition of the rise of the Easter faith.

The verses, (with the snake junk), which appear only in the Gospel of Mark, (16: 9 - 20) were a later addition, -LRB-(most scholars agree the original gospel ended with the (far more poetic), empty tomb)-RRB-.

Scholars agree that Early Christians believed in an embodied God; it was neo-Platonist influences that later turned Him into a disembodied Spirit.

As to whether the De Resurrectione Carnis comes from his «Catholic» works or not, scholars agree that Tertullian formally seceded from the Church — when he declared himself a Montanist — either in 211 or at the end of 212 at the latest.

But in Greek, many scholars agree that there are only four gifts listed.

Most scholars agree that Paul borrowed the concept of adoption from Greek or Roman law.

And of COURSE, ALL religious scholars agree with this interpretation, don't they?

Even the most secular Biblical scholars agree that the Gospels were completed by 100 AD.

Modern biblical scholars agree that the new testament scriptures were written 35 to 90 years after the alleged events, regardless who wrote them (Piso or not).

Most non-Christian scholars agree that there was a real - live man that all this is focused around, though it is probable that he never claimed to be or thought of himself as the Messiah.

The Hebrew word «almah» was mistranslated and nearly all scholars agree on this.

Pat, most Biblical scholars agree that the books we know as the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) were not written by the guys whose names are on the books.

I'm referring to historical facts about Jesus of Nazareth that scholars agree on - namely, that Jesus was crusified; he was buried in a tomb by a member of the Jewish sanhedrin; the tomb was found empty by some of his women followers; Jesus's deciples had experiences of Jesus alive from the dead; and the deciples began a movement that was so un-Jewish based on the belief that Jesus rose from the dead.

There is nothing inherently wrong with pointing out that other Bible teachers and scholars agree with your views, but the trouble comes in when some people seem ignorant of the fact that there are many good and respectable Bible teachers and scholars who disagree.

The stamp of approval that appears in Peter 2, where now, most NT scholars agree that it is unlikely that Peter authored Peter 2.

Scholars agree in assigning it to the middle of the fourth century

Most Biblical scholars agree Abraham was a myth, as well as Isaac, and Jacob.

Sorry mark, but you have been told numerous times that actual biblical scholars agree that the prostîtute story in john is a fake.

Sure, some scholars agree on certain interpretations... but that is all they are too — interpretations.

And even non-religious scholars agree that his teachings are more morally sound than any other religious figure.