Not exact matches
From 2009 - 2012,
schools retested students who initially failed the exams, and then
only the higher of the original and retest scores was used in the
accountability measure.
Thus, it can
only be viewed as a great good thing that two dozen deans of education
schools have come together under the banner of «Deans for Impact» and committed themselves to a common set of principles, including data - driven improvement, common outcome
measures, empirical validation of teacher preparation methods, and
accountability for student learning.
One of
only 16 states to reward high - performing or improving
schools, South Carolina also fares well on
measures of
school accountability.
Yes, not all that long ago AFT advocated for an ESEA that «judges
school effectiveness — the
only valid and fair basis for
accountability — by
measuring the progress that
schools achieve with the same students over time.»
While this means that some of the students, whose test scores are included in the
school's performance
measure, may have
only been in that
school for a relatively short time, it avoids problems associated with excluding the high - mobility students - typically the lowest - performing students - from the district's overall
accountability measure.
Standardized high - stakes tests also don't
measure school improvement perfectly, and they shouldn't be the
only accountability device we use.
In fact, they make it clear that historically the PSSA exams were designed for
school level
accountability and
only later have moved toward
measuring individual student mastery of Pennsylvania's academic standards.
Even the most visionary districts can make the mistake of over investing in one metric of success, and educational researcher Michael Fullan says, «In most of the
schools and education systems we have observed, the
only student learning outcome
measures available for
accountability purposes are
measures of curricular content mastery.»
The
Measures of Academic Progress, or MAP test, offers certain advantages over the Wisconsin Knowledge and Concepts Examination, which is the
only test that can be used for
school accountability purposes.
As I have noted, stronger standards alone aren't the
only reason why student achievement has improved within this period; at the same time, the higher expectations for student success fostered by the standards (along with the
accountability measures put in place by the No Child Left Behind Act, the expansion of
school choice, reform efforts by districts such as New York City, and efforts by organizations such as the College Board and the National Science and Math Initiative to get more poor and minority students to take Advanced Placement and other college prep courses), has helped more students achieve success.
He thinks a comparison of graduation rates should
only include charter
schools rated under standard
accountability measures.
Statewide
accountability systems will
only be statewide if the indicators used to
measure school quality are the same (across a grade span) for all
schools and districts.
Only there has been little real change — to my knowledge — in the status quo because
schools are seemingly still beholden to
accountability measures that link to the quantifiable
measures of NC levels.
Allows states to establish their own
accountability systems that must meet
only three requirements: annually
measure student achievement, annually assess
school performance, and include a
school improvement plan that contains interventions for poorly performing Title I
schools.
However, they also have minimized it by adopting an
accountability system, called «the dashboard,» for
schools that makes academic achievement
only one of several
measures of their competency, and leaves improvement largely in the hands of local
school officials.
While many state policymakers are continually drawn to
accountability measures that rely on sanctions and rewards, effective
school and district leaders know that true
accountability can
only be attained when teachers have the necessary knowledge and skills to improve student learning.
Such criticisms may have
only been bolstered by last week's report from Duke Law
School, which cited North Carolina private school accountability measures as «among the weakest in the country» and blasted a lack of verifiable data to back up claims that failing public school students may be rescued by their private school counter
School, which cited North Carolina private
school accountability measures as «among the weakest in the country» and blasted a lack of verifiable data to back up claims that failing public school students may be rescued by their private school counter
school accountability measures as «among the weakest in the country» and blasted a lack of verifiable data to back up claims that failing public
school students may be rescued by their private school counter
school students may be rescued by their private
school counter
school counterparts.