The sole authorizer has put several
school accountability policies in place through regulation.
A handful of states, such as Texas and North Carolina, began implementing «consequential»
school accountability policies in the early 1990s.
Not exact matches
Additional
Accountability Requirements:
School Nutrition Policy, revised in 2005, requires «each school conduct evaluations [of the school health environment] using a nationally recognized, validated survey to identify strengths and weaknesses and prioritize changes as an action plan for improving student h
School Nutrition
Policy, revised
in 2005, requires «each
school conduct evaluations [of the school health environment] using a nationally recognized, validated survey to identify strengths and weaknesses and prioritize changes as an action plan for improving student h
school conduct evaluations [of the
school health environment] using a nationally recognized, validated survey to identify strengths and weaknesses and prioritize changes as an action plan for improving student h
school health environment] using a nationally recognized, validated survey to identify strengths and weaknesses and prioritize changes as an action plan for improving student health.
Additional
accountability requirements: N.J.S.A. 18A: 33 - 15 to 18 (2007) requires new
school districts participating in any of the federally funded Child Nutrition Programs to submit their local policies to the state Department of Agriculture for a compliance check with the state's NJ School Nutrition / Wellness Policy (2005), which contains policy content requirements that go beyond Sectio
school districts participating
in any of the federally funded Child Nutrition Programs to submit their local
policies to the state Department of Agriculture for a compliance check with the state's NJ
School Nutrition / Wellness Policy (2005), which contains policy content requirements that go beyond Sectio
School Nutrition / Wellness
Policy (2005), which contains policy content requirements that go beyond Sectio
Policy (2005), which contains
policy content requirements that go beyond Sectio
policy content requirements that go beyond Section 204.
Additional
Accountability Requirements: Statute Title 70, Section 24 - 100b (2005) requires each
school district to report to the state Department of Education on the district's wellness
policy, goals, guidelines, and progress
in implementing the
policy and attaining the goals.
The Chairman of the Public Interest
Accountability Committee (PIAC), Joseph Winful, has expressed doubts about the capacity of the Heritage Fund
in its present stage, to meet the needs of the Free Senior High
School policy.
In 2013, Deming was named a William T. Grant Scholar for his project, The Long - Run Influence of School Accountability: Impacts, Mechanisms and Policy Implications, which explores the impact of test - based school accountability on post-secondary attainment and earnings, how high - stakes accountability impacts outcomes, and how test - based accountability in high school can complement college preparatio
In 2013, Deming was named a William T. Grant Scholar for his project, The Long - Run Influence of
School Accountability: Impacts, Mechanisms and Policy Implications, which explores the impact of test - based school accountability on post-secondary attainment and earnings, how high - stakes accountability impacts outcomes, and how test - based accountability in high school can complement college prepar
School Accountability: Impacts, Mechanisms and Policy Implications, which explores the impact of test - based school accountability on post-secondary attainment and earnings, how high - stakes accountability impacts outcomes, and how test - based accountability in high school can complement colleg
Accountability: Impacts, Mechanisms and
Policy Implications, which explores the impact of test - based
school accountability on post-secondary attainment and earnings, how high - stakes accountability impacts outcomes, and how test - based accountability in high school can complement college prepar
school accountability on post-secondary attainment and earnings, how high - stakes accountability impacts outcomes, and how test - based accountability in high school can complement colleg
accountability on post-secondary attainment and earnings, how high - stakes
accountability impacts outcomes, and how test - based accountability in high school can complement colleg
accountability impacts outcomes, and how test - based
accountability in high school can complement colleg
accountability in high school can complement college preparatio
in high
school can complement college prepar
school can complement college preparation.
«
Accountability for student performance is one of the two or three - if not the most - prominent issues
in policy at the state and local levels right now,» says Richard F. Elmore, a professor at Harvard University's Graduate
School of Education (Quality Counts, 1999)
But «just right»
policies — strong
accountability, lots of operational autonomy, fair funding, no micromanaging — tend to be embraced by charter
school realists
in the center of the political spectrum.
The intuition behind this approach is that NCLB represented less of a «treatment»
in states that had already adopted NCLB - like
school -
accountability policies prior to 2002.
Paul Peterson interviews Robert Shapiro, an expert on public opinion, about how the partisan divide
in education
policy is shifting, as issues of
school quality and
accountability have produced «conflicted liberals,» at the same time that the presidential election is creating «conflicted conservatives.»
Report cards track and compare state education
policies and outcomes
in six areas: chance - for - success; K — 12 achievement; standards, assessments, and
accountability; transitions and alignment; the teaching profession; and
school finance.
It also appeals to the yearning of some GOP lawmakers and libertarian
policy wonks to get Uncle Sam completely out of the
school -
accountability business (though they'll gag on Rothstein's demand for buckets more
in federal dollars for those unaccountable
schools and sundry other services to kids).
We address this issue by comparing trends
in student achievement across states that had varying degrees of prior experience with state
school -
accountability policies similar to those brought about by NCLB.
Another study, by Eric Hanushek and Margaret Raymond, both also at Stanford, evaluated the impact of
school -
accountability policies on state - level NAEP math and reading achievement measured by the difference between the performance of a state's 8th graders and that of 4th graders
in the same state four years earlier.
This strategy relies on the assertion that pre-NCLB
school -
accountability policies were comparable to NCLB — that is, that the two types of
accountability regimes are similar
in the most relevant respects.
The two most important changes
in American education
policy over the past several decades have been the expansion of
school choice and changes to
school accountability.
In his work on
accountability policy, HGSE Professor Richard Elmore has found this development of internal
accountability to be a critical component of improving
schools.
One of the most significant changes
in educational
policy of the past two decades is the movement toward test - based
accountability in the
schools.
In 2013, he was named a William T. Grant Scholar, a prestigious five - year award for early career researchers for his proposed project, The Long - Run Influence of
School Accountability: Impacts, Mechanisms and
Policy Implications.
by Brett Wigdortz, founder and CEO, Teach First; Fair access: Making
school choice and admissions work for all by Rebecca Allen, reader in the economics of education at the Institute of Education, University of London; School accountability, performance and pupil attainment by Simon Burgess, professor of economics at the University of Bristol, and director of the Centre for Market and Public Organisation; The importance of teaching by Dylan Wiliam, emeritus professor at the Institute of Education, University of London; Reducing within - school variation and the role of middle leadership by James Toop, ceo of Teaching Leaders; The importance of collaboration: Creating «families of schools» by Tim Brighouse, a former teacher and chief education officer of Oxfordshire and Birmingham; Testing times: Reforming classroom teaching through assessment by Christine Harrison, senior lecturer in science education at King's College London; Tackling pupil disengagement: Making the curriculum more engaging by David Price, author and educational consultant; Beyond the school gates: Developing children's zones for England by Alan Dyson, professor of education at the University of Manchester and co-director of the Centre for Equity in Education, Kirstin Kerr, lecturer in education at the University of Manchester and Chris Wellings, head of programme policy in Save the Children's UK Programme; After school: Promoting opportunities for all young people in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University of L
school choice and admissions work for all by Rebecca Allen, reader
in the economics of education at the Institute of Education, University of London;
School accountability, performance and pupil attainment by Simon Burgess, professor of economics at the University of Bristol, and director of the Centre for Market and Public Organisation; The importance of teaching by Dylan Wiliam, emeritus professor at the Institute of Education, University of London; Reducing within - school variation and the role of middle leadership by James Toop, ceo of Teaching Leaders; The importance of collaboration: Creating «families of schools» by Tim Brighouse, a former teacher and chief education officer of Oxfordshire and Birmingham; Testing times: Reforming classroom teaching through assessment by Christine Harrison, senior lecturer in science education at King's College London; Tackling pupil disengagement: Making the curriculum more engaging by David Price, author and educational consultant; Beyond the school gates: Developing children's zones for England by Alan Dyson, professor of education at the University of Manchester and co-director of the Centre for Equity in Education, Kirstin Kerr, lecturer in education at the University of Manchester and Chris Wellings, head of programme policy in Save the Children's UK Programme; After school: Promoting opportunities for all young people in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University of L
School accountability, performance and pupil attainment by Simon Burgess, professor of economics at the University of Bristol, and director of the Centre for Market and Public Organisation; The importance of teaching by Dylan Wiliam, emeritus professor at the Institute of Education, University of London; Reducing within -
school variation and the role of middle leadership by James Toop, ceo of Teaching Leaders; The importance of collaboration: Creating «families of schools» by Tim Brighouse, a former teacher and chief education officer of Oxfordshire and Birmingham; Testing times: Reforming classroom teaching through assessment by Christine Harrison, senior lecturer in science education at King's College London; Tackling pupil disengagement: Making the curriculum more engaging by David Price, author and educational consultant; Beyond the school gates: Developing children's zones for England by Alan Dyson, professor of education at the University of Manchester and co-director of the Centre for Equity in Education, Kirstin Kerr, lecturer in education at the University of Manchester and Chris Wellings, head of programme policy in Save the Children's UK Programme; After school: Promoting opportunities for all young people in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University of L
school variation and the role of middle leadership by James Toop, ceo of Teaching Leaders; The importance of collaboration: Creating «families of
schools» by Tim Brighouse, a former teacher and chief education officer of Oxfordshire and Birmingham; Testing times: Reforming classroom teaching through assessment by Christine Harrison, senior lecturer
in science education at King's College London; Tackling pupil disengagement: Making the curriculum more engaging by David Price, author and educational consultant; Beyond the
school gates: Developing children's zones for England by Alan Dyson, professor of education at the University of Manchester and co-director of the Centre for Equity in Education, Kirstin Kerr, lecturer in education at the University of Manchester and Chris Wellings, head of programme policy in Save the Children's UK Programme; After school: Promoting opportunities for all young people in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University of L
school gates: Developing children's zones for England by Alan Dyson, professor of education at the University of Manchester and co-director of the Centre for Equity
in Education, Kirstin Kerr, lecturer
in education at the University of Manchester and Chris Wellings, head of programme
policy in Save the Children's UK Programme; After
school: Promoting opportunities for all young people in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University of L
school: Promoting opportunities for all young people
in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University of London.
A few major areas I hope will receive attention during reauthorization are college / workplace readiness, including the promotion of more rigorous standards; greater
accountability at the secondary level; more sophisticated
policy and greater
accountability for improving teacher effectiveness, particularly at the late elementary and secondary levels; a broadening of attention to math and science as well as to history; and refinements
in AYP to focus greater attention and improvement on the persistently failing
schools by offering real choices to parents of students stuck
in such
schools.
As we continue to study choice - based
policies in K — 12 education, one challenge we must confront is the push - pull created by high - stakes
accountability measures designed to assess
schools, students, and educators, based solely on test scores — an area where choice proponents and opponents often find common ground.
Responding to the need to look beyond test scores to measure
school quality, an increasing number of
school districts are striving to incorporate socio - emotional learning measures
in their
accountability policies.
In a similar vein, Jennifer Vranek and her colleagues at Education First write, «Past
accountability systems were the darlings of
policy makers, think tanks, foundations, editorial boards, and advocates; they rarely had the support of educators,
school communities, and the public writ large.
Moreover, the cross-
school differences
in the relative success of advantaged and disadvantaged students argue for enacting
school accountability policies that shine the light on the success of specific populations, rather than concentrating solely on overall schoolwide performance levels or gains.
I am an education
policy researcher who's taken a few detours into
policy jobs — once
in the Office of Data and
Accountability of DC Public
Schools, and once as the Deputy of Educator Preparation for the State of Delaware under its Race - to - the - Top efforts.
This study examined Career Academies
in the early 1990s, before many of the occupations common today even existed and prior to the introduction of
policies with important implications for secondary
schools (e.g.,
school accountability).
Designing an effective charter
school policy therefore requires attention to details about
accountability and other features, such as whether enrollment
in charters is unified with traditional public
school enrollment processes and whether charter
schools provide transportation for students.
With these strengths and challenges
in mind, the OECD sets out an ambitious reform agenda covering three key areas: promoting equity; building capacity for teaching and learning; and
policy steering,
accountability and
school improvement.
Several of the most significant features of recent education
policy debate
in the United States are simply not found
in any of these countries — for example, charter
schools, pathways into teaching that allow candidates with only several weeks of training to assume full responsibility for a classroom, teacher evaluation systems based on student test scores, and
school accountability systems based on the premise that
schools with low average test scores are failures, irrespective of the compositions of their student populations.
Although it's not possible to attribute these declines to any specific education
policy, it's also hard to conclude that incentive schemes and new
school accountability arrangements
in these countries have had a positive impact on student performance.
The Commission will examine factors
in raising student achievement from prekindergarten through high
school including: state
accountability and curriculum requirements; model programs to improve student achievement beginning
in early learning programs and continuing throughout high
school; strategies for every student to achieve at grade level such as intervention and support systems; and
policies to improve student attendance and retention.
This study examines the major shift
in California and across the nation
in school accountability policy.
All states need to develop
accountability systems that deal thoughtfully and usefully with test results, that deploy educational resources so as to aid teaching and learning, and that involve families
in educational
policy and
in schools.
Members of the National Advisory Board work with NACSA to advance excellence and
accountability in the charter
school sector through effective charter
school policy and thoughtful charter authorizing practices.
But we believe
in private
school choice, too — indeed, we believe
in every kind of
school choice that works for kids — and have previously mapped the touchy territory of
accountability for «voucher
schools» and advised
policy makers on how to deal with these challenging trade - offs and balancing acts.
We chose to label the years that four key
accountability policies went into effect,
in order to look for a possible relationship between alternative
school enrollment the implementation of
policies that would penalize
schools for poor performance.
In Smith's model, as it was refined over time, curriculum standards serve as the fulcrum for educational reform implemented based on state decisions; state policy elites aim to create excellence in the classroom using an array of policy levers and knobs — all aligned back to the standards — including testing, textbook adoption, teacher preparation, teacher certification and evaluation, teacher training, goals and timetables for school test score improvement, and state accountability based on those goals and timetable
In Smith's model, as it was refined over time, curriculum standards serve as the fulcrum for educational reform implemented based on state decisions; state
policy elites aim to create excellence
in the classroom using an array of policy levers and knobs — all aligned back to the standards — including testing, textbook adoption, teacher preparation, teacher certification and evaluation, teacher training, goals and timetables for school test score improvement, and state accountability based on those goals and timetable
in the classroom using an array of
policy levers and knobs — all aligned back to the standards — including testing, textbook adoption, teacher preparation, teacher certification and evaluation, teacher training, goals and timetables for
school test score improvement, and state
accountability based on those goals and timetables.
Given the vastness of the terrain, the course will be grounded
in three education
policy / reform initiatives that have gained considerable currency over the past decade: (1) Standards and
Accountability (2) Teacher Quality & (3)
School Choice - Vouchers and Charter
Schools
Frequent topics include
school improvement, leadership, standards,
accountability, the achievement gap, classroom practice, professional development, teacher education, research, technology and innovations
in teaching and learning, state and federal
policy, and education and the global economy.
The study, by
Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE), examines the potential effects of using single measures
in California's CORE districts, where multiple measures of
school performance are included
in annual
accountability reports.
«We also find that «F» - graded
schools engaged
in systematically different changes
in instructional
policies and practices as a consequence of
school accountability pressure, and that these
policy changes may explain a significant share of the test score improvements (
in some subject areas) associated with «F» - grade receipt.»
In both reading and mathematics, low - and moderate - achieving
schools made overall gains greater than those of high - achieving
schools under the
accountability policy.
But none of them hold as much promise for student learning as any one of the many
school reforms on the nation's agenda — student and
school accountability,
school choice, and changes
in teacher recruitment, compensation and retention
policies.
In light of the news of Tony Bennett's resignation, Fordham asked several top education -
policy analysts to explore what the resignation would mean for
school accountability going forward.
The foundation is also working much more aggressively to change public
policy concerning key elements of the portfolio approach: transparency
in school finance, multiple independent
school providers, and performance - based
accountability.
The second half of the book seeks to apply the theoretical framework to three
policy case studies
in the areas of
school finance,
school accountability, and
school autonomy and parental choice.
In conducting the study, researchers with RAND convened a panel of experts on school accountability policies, reviewed published research, conducted interviews with educators and reviewed the measures employed in each state that publishes its own school ratings in addition to those required under NCL
In conducting the study, researchers with RAND convened a panel of experts on
school accountability policies, reviewed published research, conducted interviews with educators and reviewed the measures employed
in each state that publishes its own school ratings in addition to those required under NCL
in each state that publishes its own
school ratings
in addition to those required under NCL
in addition to those required under NCLB.
A recent study by co-author Elacqua and his colleagues, for example, found that low - performing
schools facing
accountability pressures modified their teaching
policies and practices
in meaningful ways.