One suggestion is that charter
school authorizers require that in addition to academic qualifications, charter - school applicants show how «the school will broaden, not replicate, existing opportunities for struggling populations.»
Not exact matches
Unlike most private
schools, however, they are
required to participate in state testing systems and can be closed by their
authorizers if they fail to meet performance goals.
The sweet spot
requires stipulating the importance of meaningful
authorizer oversight for public charter
schools that collect public funds and that such oversight should respect charter autonomy and the ability of educators and innovators to launch promising
schools.
Authorizers require prospective
school operators to go through an application process; approved
schools must have clear performance goals; the
authorizer tracks
schools» compliance with applicable state policies; the
authorizer closes
schools that fail.
Authorizers play a powerful role in supporting proposed new charter
schools by
requiring applicants to articulate how they will support all students — students with IEPs in particular.
So it seems that
authorizers are generally unwilling to close a
school that is failing to comply with federal or state law, but they are also unwilling to
require the
school to make changes to its special education program, presumably because the
authorizers see this as infringement on charter autonomy.
Authorizers can also avoid having to step in on the back end by more attention to prevention during the application process, for example, requiring schools to simply describe their marketing / outreach plans for students with disabilities (only a quarter of authorizers surveyed do
Authorizers can also avoid having to step in on the back end by more attention to prevention during the application process, for example,
requiring schools to simply describe their marketing / outreach plans for students with disabilities (only a quarter of
authorizers surveyed do
authorizers surveyed do this now).
For
schools nearing the end of their current charter term, CEI can help prepare your renewal application, conduct mock
school visits to prepare for your
authorizer review, and address any issues raised by the
authorizer required to gain charter renewal.
The report finds that a more transparent, accountable, and fair system will
require action from all parties, including
school districts, charter
authorizers, charter operators, and states.
Caprice Young, founder of the California Charter
Schools Association (CCSA) and CEO of Magnolia Public
Schools: «If I did a Lexus Nexus Google search of every abuse at every
school district in the state of California, the list would be about 40 times that long... What I would say in response to (the ACLU report) is that charters are
required to have their entire enrollment procedure approved by whoever their
authorizer happens to be.
And as an important safeguard, the laws
require charter
school authorizers to approve the operators and management teams parents select.
Each charter
school is
required to develop a contract and an accountability plan with their
authorizer.
The state and the district level charter
authorizers need to do their due diligence and make sure these
school are not free to act a private
schools with public money just as TPSs are
required to be accountable.
This responsibility
requires authorizers to hold
schools accountable for fulfilling fundamental public education obligations to all students, including providing equal access and appropriate services to students whose native language is not English.
According to the Senate bill analysis, «This bill
requires all charter
school petitions to be approved by the governing board of the
school district in which the charter
school is located, prohibits a charter
school from locating outside its
authorizer's boundaries, and limits the current charter appeal process to claims of procedural violations.»
Local
school boards account for 173 of 175 potential charter
school authorizers in Kentucky and are
required under KRS 160.1594 to, among other tasks, «solicit, invite, and evaluate applications from applicants.»
Another example: Ohio's law
requires authorizers to provide technical assistance to their
schools.
To pay for the staff and outside contractors needed to review the books and analyze testing data, the
schools will be
required to pay a per - pupil fee to the
authorizers.
Most of these restrictions originate from district
authorizers requiring charter
schools to adopt district codes of conduct.
Sixteen states and the District of Columbia currently have established standards to which
authorizers must adhere.32 33 Further, ECS finds that more states are
requiring authorizers to submit annual reports on their portfolios of
schools to ensure transparency for both operations and results.
A prior version of this story incorrectly reported that SB 1290 will
require charter
schools authorizers to consider student performance as measured by the Academic Performanc Index as the most important factor when considering renwals.