The Truth: The majority of gold - standard studies of
school choice programs find kids do better with school choice.
CAMBRIDGE, MA — A new study of the Charlotte - Mecklenburg, North Carolina (CMS)
school choice program finds that high - risk male youth who are admitted by lottery to their preferred schools commit fewer crimes and remain in school longer than their peers who seek admittance but do not gain seats in the lottery process.
[52] Likewise, a comprehensive study of families participating in Washington, DC's private
school choice program found that «parents do not view test scores as the key metric of success in education.»
Not exact matches
The survey
found that since 2014, when the majority of updated nutrition standards for
school meals were in effect, more
school meal
programs have launched initiatives to market healthier
school food
choices and increase their appeal among students.
I
find school lunch
programs to be a «black hole» of poor health
choices.
We could
find plenty of examples of disconnect from other policy interventions, such as pre-
school programs, but I am focusing on
school choice because I know this literature best.
Previous gold standard studies had almost unanimously
found modest positive effects from
school choice, which raises the obvious question: what makes the Louisiana Scholarship
Program (LSP) so different?
Your article on the Milwaukee
school -
choice evaluation («New Studies on Private Choice Contradict Each Other,» Sept. 4, 1996) accurately reports that our study of the Milwaukee choice program found that choice students outperformed a comparable control group of Milwaukee Public Schools students on standardized tests by a considerable amount after three and four years of experience in the choice sc
choice evaluation («New Studies on Private
Choice Contradict Each Other,» Sept. 4, 1996) accurately reports that our study of the Milwaukee choice program found that choice students outperformed a comparable control group of Milwaukee Public Schools students on standardized tests by a considerable amount after three and four years of experience in the choice sc
Choice Contradict Each Other,» Sept. 4, 1996) accurately reports that our study of the Milwaukee
choice program found that choice students outperformed a comparable control group of Milwaukee Public Schools students on standardized tests by a considerable amount after three and four years of experience in the choice sc
choice program found that
choice students outperformed a comparable control group of Milwaukee Public Schools students on standardized tests by a considerable amount after three and four years of experience in the choice sc
choice students outperformed a comparable control group of Milwaukee Public
Schools students on standardized tests by a considerable amount after three and four years of experience in the choice s
Schools students on standardized tests by a considerable amount after three and four years of experience in the
choice sc
choice schoolsschools.
These
findings suggest avenues for future research on the optimal design of private
school choice programs.
An audit of the private
schools in the Milwaukee
school -
choice program by the Wisconsin education department has
found that nearly a third of the
schools exceeded enrollment limits set by state law.
Perhaps these
findings may motivate several Jewish organizations to reconsider their opposition to private
school choice programs.
That is the case in 2016, as education reformers struggle with the meaning of
choice and opportunity two decades after
founding the first charter
schools and voucher
programs.
The use of interdistrict -
choice programs is unlikely to increase most students» educational opportunities significantly, a new report concludes, despite recent attention to the idea as a means of reducing economic and racial segregation and giving students in low - performing public
schools a chance to
find a better
school.
During her 25 - year career in education, Kristin has worked with a mentoring and financial aid
program for NYC high
schoolers while
founding the
School Choice Scholarships Foundation and Bronx Preparatory Charter
School.
First, studies
found that three
school choice programs improved ELA and / or math achievement but not high
school graduation:
Multiple evaluations, by organizations ranging from the Manhattan Institute to the Urban League, have
found the
choice programs to have had a positive impact on Florida public
schools.
In examining 23 different
school choice programs in 12 states, I
found that not only did private
school regulations accompany
school choice programs, but a majority were in place before those
programs even existed.
Trump has promised to «go big» on
school choice, and it's hard to imagine Congress
finding more than a few hundred million dollars for any new education
program, especially one run out of the U.S. Department of Education.
There is now a body of evidence on the effects of
school choice: the positive
findings from Charlotte comport with the positive results of privately funded
programs in New York; Washington, D.C.; and Dayton, as well as pilot voucher
programs in Milwaukee and Cleveland.
Tucker then
founded the National Center on Education and the Economy and, in that role, created the Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce, the New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce, the New Standards Consortium, America's
Choice (a comprehensive
school reform program), the National Institute for School Leadership and Excellence for All (a high school reform pro
school reform
program), the National Institute for
School Leadership and Excellence for All (a high school reform pro
School Leadership and Excellence for All (a high
school reform pro
school reform
program).
At the very least all
schools should to given the
choice employ non-religious counsellors or welfare workers under this
program, not just those that can not
find a chaplain.
Researchers
found little evidence that
school choice programs actually boost student achievement.
As a result of our
findings of no consistent statistical association between the achievement and attainment effects in
school choice studies we urged commentators and policymakers «to be more humble» in judging
school choice programs or
schools of
choice based solely or primarily on initial test score effects.
If we focus only on the true
school choice programs — private
school choice, open enrollment, charter
schools, STEM
schools, and small
schools of
choice — and we look at the direction of the impacts (positive or negative) regardless of their statistical significance, we
find a high degree of alignment between achievement and attainment outcomes.
Only one study, conducted by Jay Greene and Marcus Winters and focusing on the D.C. voucher
program,
found that voucher competition had no effect on the test scores of non-participants, while no empirical study of acceptable rigor has
found that a U.S. private -
school -
choice program decreased the achievement of public
school students.
Danish Shakeel, Kaitlin Anderson, and I conducted a meta - analysis of the 16 experimental studies,
finding that the private -
school -
choice programs evaluated in the United States have increased student achievement by an average of.13 standard deviations in reading by the fourth year after the study started.
Studies
found that three
school choice programs improved ELA and / or math achievement but not high school graduation: Boston charter schools, the SEED charter school, and the Texas I - STEM S
school choice programs improved ELA and / or math achievement but not high
school graduation: Boston charter schools, the SEED charter school, and the Texas I - STEM S
school graduation: Boston charter
schools, the SEED charter
school, and the Texas I - STEM S
school, and the Texas I - STEM
SchoolSchool.
Among the subset of students for whom data are available, we
find that transfers made possible by the
school -
choice program overwhelmingly improve integration in the public
schools that students leave (the sending
schools), bringing the racial composition of the
schools closer to that of the broader communities in which they are located.
In our study we draw upon the
findings from 24 evaluations of various types of
school choice programs to show that the achievement effects from those
programs are only weakly and inconsistently predictive of their subsequent attainment effects.
Thus, any hint of even experimenting with
school choice has been vigorously attacked, a notable example being Florida's
program of exit vouchers, which permitted students stuck in persistently failing
schools to try to
find some way to save themselves through an alternative
school.
My other main point is that the set of regulations
found in Louisiana's voucher
program are viewed by some of the most important backers of
school choice as the ideal.
«Not only do we have a current snapshot of parent satisfaction with Indiana's
school choice program, but we are able to track parents who responded three years ago to
find out what
choices they've continued to make and gauge their satisfaction over time,» said Friedman Foundation president and CEO Robert C. Enlow.
These
findings indicate Indiana's
school choice programs accomplish the goal of better matching students with
schools that fit their needs.
If the detractors of
school choice suggest shutting down the
program because one report
found negative one - year results, they would presumably advocate for shutting down the chronic failing public
schools in D.C., for the negative results there are far more numerous and long - term.
Last week, several news outlets circulated a report by the U.S. Department of Education's research division that
found negative results for students who participated in the District of Columbia's Opportunity Scholarship
Program (OSP), the only private school choice program for low - income children in Washington, D.C. Predictably, opponents of school choice descended on the report to tout it as evidence that school choice does no
Program (OSP), the only private
school choice program for low - income children in Washington, D.C. Predictably, opponents of school choice descended on the report to tout it as evidence that school choice does no
program for low - income children in Washington, D.C. Predictably, opponents of
school choice descended on the report to tout it as evidence that
school choice does not work.
A recent American Enterprise Institute study
found that states with lightly regulated
school choice programs had much higher rates of
school participation than highly regulated states.
Find details about the various forms of private and public
school choice programs offered in all 50 states.
The survey
found that a large majority of
choice parents are satisfied with their new
schools and were easily able to
find a suitable private
school that participates in the state's voucher or tax - credit scholarship
program.
Nine of those studies
found that
school choice provided a more integrated classroom experience, one
found no visible difference, and no empirical study had ever
found that a
school choice program made ethnic segregation worse.
Patrick J. Wolf, education policy professor at the University of Arkansas, reports on a meta - analysis of 16 experimental studies of private -
school -
choice programs, which
found achievement gains in reading.
Fordham also downplays the likely effect of their proposed regulations by assuring that they «won't scare away [private]
schools,» citing a previous Fordham study which
found that most private
schools would participate in a
school choice program even if that meant accepting such regulations.
This is also an important topic because DeVos
founded and now directs a national organization advocating for vouchers and other private
school choice programs.
Of twelve randomized controlled trials — the gold standard of social science research — eleven
found that
school choice programs improve outcomes for some or all students while only one
found no statistically significant difference and none
found a negative impact.
Though the only data on large - scale voucher
programs she
finds convincing come from her own study of the New Zealand public -
choice program and Martin Carnoy's work in Chile, Ladd confidently asserts that vouchers will not help those public
schools that are having the hardest time of it.
Other studies linking high
school quality to college, including evaluations of a public
school -
choice program in Charlotte - Mecklenburg
Schools in North Carolina and of Harlem Children's Zone Promise Academy in New York City have
found impacts that are either transitory or not statistically significant.
School choice opponents have seized on these
findings as evidence that these
programs are ineffective and even harmful while advocates point out that Louisiana is heavily regulated, the first few years of an evaluation tell only the worst part of a story (i.e. there are transition effects), and that we should be careful about a heavy - handed focus on test scores.
In Milwaukee, we
found that students attending public charter
schools and private
schools participating in the Milwaukee Parental
Choice Program outperform their public
school peers on both the Forward Exam and by 7 percent on the ACT.
Annual parental
choice survey
finds a majority of parents approve of academic gains and support Louisiana's
school choice program
Good Morning A new study from Patrick J. Wolf at the University of Arkansas
found that students in the Milwaukee Parental
Choice Program were likely to commit crimes than comparable students who attended Milwaukee public
schools.
We
find that students attending
schools in the Wisconsin Parental
Choice Program score a staggering 16 percent higher than students in traditional public
schools.