There is no shortage of
school choice proponents willing to let the NAACP off the hook for siding with union bosses against parents desperate for quality education choices for their children.
Not exact matches
Proponents of market - based education reform often argue that introducing charter
schools and other
school choice policies creates a competitive dynamic that
will prompt low - performing districts to improve their practice.
Many
proponents of private
school choice — both the voucher and tax credit scholarship versions — take for granted that
schools won't participate (or shouldn't participate) if government asks too much of them, regulates their practices, requires them to reveal closely held information and — above all — demands that they be publicly accountable for student achievement.
Many
proponents of such a system point to our consumer market and its dizzying array of
choices as evidence that competition
will initiate public
school reforms to meet the needs of society.
«
Choice proponents contend that using public funds to subsidize private
school tuition
will improve achievement among low - income and special needs students, however the research has shown no conclusive evidence that this is the result,» continued Gentzel.
Proponents of parent trigger laws contend that parents are best positioned to advocate for their children's education and
will make informed
choices about the
school options that are presented to them.
While the changes could rope more siblings into the voucher program,
school choice proponents have told StateImpact many of the state's private
schools are already nearing capacity — and unless the state increases the amount of a scholarship, it's not likely more private
schools will open to accept them.
How Music Got Free: The End of an Industry, the Turn of the Century, and the Patient Zero of Piracy: Be they
school choice advocates or activists for revamping teacher quality or even standards and accountability
proponents, many reformers have a tendency to believe that their favored solution
will transform American public education.
Far from a dismissal of the public good, the vision for
school choice proponents is that increased competition in the marketplace
will benefit everyone.
Proponents of parental
school choice programs in the state
will mark 25 years of
school choice this evening.
Proponents of the bill argued that charter
schools will address the achievement gap for many vulnerable children in Kentucky and offer parents another
choice.
«
Choice»
proponents will say in their most incredulous voice, «You'd leave those kids trapped in those failing
schools.»
While there are clear exceptions to the generalizations I
will make in this analysis, I have chosen to focus on charter
schools that exemplify a trend of exclusion that compromises the ideals of the
school choice system as a whole, demonstrating how the model fails to measure up to the paragon of student and parent autonomy lauded by
choice proponents.