However, others expressed skepticism about what I shall call the Overregulation Theory, and proposed alternative explanations for the LSP's poor results, while a few more raised concerns about the impact of a more free - market
school choice system on equity.
Not exact matches
The American
school lunch
system has
choices on the menu.
On April 11, New York
schools reported some widespread problems with the computerized tests for students in grades 3 - 8, such as students not being able to log in and «
system error» showing up as test
choices.
De Blasio said
on Monday that Carranza had been his second
choice after Carvalho, the flamboyant head of the Miami - Dade County
school system.
The inability of the two sides to agree
on an appeals process had been the reason why talks
on a new evaluation
system for 33
schools in the restart and transformation models had broken down and the reason that the mayor gave for saying he had no
choice but to close those
schools.
This damning statistic from last week's New
School study on school choice exposes the absurdity of new Chancellor Richard Carranza's vow that «all students will be supported» as he aims to desegregate the s
School study
on school choice exposes the absurdity of new Chancellor Richard Carranza's vow that «all students will be supported» as he aims to desegregate the s
school choice exposes the absurdity of new Chancellor Richard Carranza's vow that «all students will be supported» as he aims to desegregate the
system.
In three new articles published in Education Next, researchers with the Education Research Alliance for New Orleans (ERA - New Orleans) at Tulane University, directed by professor of economics, Douglas Harris, show the impact of the reforms
on student performance; consider to what degree the city's
system of
school choice provides a variety of distinct options for families; and take a careful look at the city's unique centralized enrollment
system.
Education Week quoted a former associate superintendent of the Cincinnati
schools, who blamed the proposal's failure
on the fact that it «would have applied to nearly all teachers, rather than allowing veterans the
choice of opting into the new
system.»
One interpretation of the emphasis
on developing the common core curriculum is that these debates provide a convenient diversion from potentially more intractable fights over bigger reform ideas like using improved teacher evaluations for personnel decisions, expanded
school choice, or enhanced accountability
systems.
With the new open - enrollment
system, educators believed they could capitalize
on the Small
Schools of
Choice reform.
The limited research
on efforts to improve
school choice systems also demonstrates that simplifying the information parents receive about their
school choices increases the likelihood that parents will select a higher - performing
school.
In short, a
system of
school choice would prove more satisfying for educators because it could foster the creation of cohesive learning communities based
on common beliefs about teaching and learning.
For much of the past few years, reflecting general concerns about the quality of public
schooling, discussions of magnet
schools have centered
on their potential for providing intensive instruction in such subjects as science and mathematics, serving as models of effectiveness, and increasing family
choice within the public
system.
Professor Richard Murnane, the student - selected faculty speaker, reflected
on five decades of education and the five challenges currently facing all educators around the world: make equality a reality for all children; use money so it affects students» daily experience; create
schools that prepare children for the future; make
school choice work for the most disadvantaged; and create
school accountability
systems that improve education for all our children.
(The Christian Science Monitor) Professor Richard Murnane and alum Rick Hess weigh in
on if the US can embrace
school choice and a strong public
school system at the same time.
The key points from each strand are highlighted as follows: Early Identification and support • Early identification of need: health and development review at 2/2.5 years • Support in early years from health professionals: greater capacity from health visiting services • Accessible and high quality early years provision: DfE and DfH joint policy statement
on the early years; tickell review of EYFS; free entitlement of 15 hours for disadvantaged two year olds • A new approach to statutory assessment: education, health and care plan to replace statement • A more efficient statutory assessment process: DoH to improve the provision and timeliness of health advice; to reduce time limit for current statutory assessment process to 20 weeks Giving parent's control • Supporting families through the
system: a continuation of early support resources • Clearer information for parents: local authorities to set out a local offer of support; slim down requirements
on schools to publish SEN information • Giving parents more control over support and funding for their child: individual budget by 2014 for all those with EHC plan • A clear
choice of
school: parents will have rights to express a preference for a state - funded
school • Short breaks for carers and children: a continuation in investment in short breaks • Mediation to resolve disagreements: use of mediation before a parent can register an appeal with the Tribunal
And although the chapter
on Canada fails to make any mention of it, Canada has an extensive
system of
school choice, offering options that vary by language and religious denomination.
In the preceding analyses, we excluded charter
schools so we could focus
on choice policies within the traditional public
school system.
Though vague
on how the city's
choice system had contributed to the problem, the report implied that because a small number of
schools were serving a disproportionate share of «high need» students, their likelihood of failure had increased.
Downsborough believes that a discipline
system based
on respect,
choice, and appropriate consequences will lead to a reduction in behaviour incidents and a more positive
school environment.
The explanation for this odd fact: since 1981 Chile has had a more comprehensive
school choice system than any other country in the world, as well as a
system of publicly available information
on student test performance.
If
choice through vouchers can create conditions that promote academic achievement, and if it can put political pressure
on what are often intractable urban
school systems, it merits serious consideration.
If
school choice advocates, philanthropists, and policymakers are willing to put our collective foot
on the accelerator, we can help transform this antiquated K - 12
system into a 21st - century, student - centered model where every child can reach their potential.
This superb short report by Lake and Schnaiberg
on special education in NOLA shows how a
system of
choice and autonomous
schools can, if wisely organized, offer improved services to high - need kids.
(Dozens of selective high
schools in New York City — not including the eight that rely entirely
on test scores — follow a complex citywide dual - track
choice - and - selection process akin to the «match»
system by which medical residents get placed.)
There are proposals for new approaches to public governance, research findings
on the efficacy of decentralized
systems, comparisons of cities that are expanding
choice, ideas for accountability and
school supply, and disagreements about who should have ultimate authority.
Though the excellent new CRPE report «How Parents Experience Public
School Choice» focuses on how families navigate choice - based systems, the new role of government is front and c
Choice» focuses
on how families navigate
choice - based systems, the new role of government is front and c
choice - based
systems, the new role of government is front and center.
«The public educational
system is a monopoly,» he wrote in 1967, offering
choice only to «those who [can] afford to buy education outside the public
schools» and thereby amplifying the influence of family background
on student achievement.
In their work at the Project for Policy Innovation in Education, Kane and his colleagues have been working with
school districts around the country, using data to evaluate hiring and certification policies for teachers, public
school choice systems, and the effect of charter and pilot
schools on student outcomes.
That suite includes «public and private
school choice,» which would be «a catalyst to improve the
system»; better teacher training and evaluation;
school evaluations based
on student performance; and more digital learning.
Unfortunately, we lack a robust
system of
school choice and instead have to rely
on democratic institutions, like
school boards and state legislatures, to determine most
school policies and practices.
But some cities, like Denver, are leading the way in practices to help ease the burden
on parents, such as universal enrollment
systems and partnerships between districts and charter
schools to assist parents in making informed
choices.
For more information
on New Orleans, read «Good News for New Orleans: Early evidence shows reforms lifting student achievement,» by Douglas N. Harris, and «Many Options in New Orleans
Choice System:
School characteristics vary widely,» by Paula Arce - Trigatti, Douglas N. Harris, Huriya Jabbar, and Jane Arnold Lincove.
Her research has been focused predominately
on K - 12 public education fiscal policy, as well as the competitive and efficiency effects of
school choice on the public
school system.
City leaders have formed a range of organizations to help facilitate the new
choice - based
system, for instance, by collecting and publicizing information
on schools and helping families
on waiting lists find other options.
Much of the argument for parental
choice in education has focused
on the urgent needs of disadvantaged students, who are often trapped in unsafe and failing
schools because of the
system of zip - code assignment.
While the national discourse focuses
on the merits of
school choice initiatives in their own right and for their own sakes, as leaders of state and local education
systems, as educators of diverse regional, political, and professional backgrounds, we believe that these policies are better thought of as means to critical ends, and that the goal of these and other education policies should be, above all else, the enhancement of skills for America's youngest generation and expanded opportunity for children to thrive as adults.
Louisiana's Course
Choice program is limited to students attending a
school rated «C» or lower
on the state's accountability
system and includes a much narrower array of educational services and products than ESAs.
Friedman's
system also allowed for
choice on both sides of the market: Just as parents got to pick where to send their kids,
schools had the right to accept some applicants and reject others.
This faith - based charter compromise could lead to a renewed urban
school system — one based
on equitable funding, more diverse options, parental
choice, and comprehensive transparency and accountability.
Instead of a
system with limited
choice for families, predicated
on a lottery
system, all families in the District should have control over their child's share of education funding, and should be able to take those funds to any
school or education option of
choice.
This year, 87 % of students who attended a closing
school and used the enrollment
system received
on of their top three
choices for the next
school year.
«He's been tentative
on choice issues,» says the institute's executive director, Jim Stergios, citing Payzant's refusal to push for more charters and his slowness in expanding the student assignment
system used to determine where children attend
school.
After all, the reasons for promoting
choice often rest
on the fact that public
school systems are strangled by politics, bureaucracy, byzantine contractual rules, and licensing procedures that aggravate a shortage of quality employees.
During his eight years in Tallahassee, the governor established a far - reaching accountability
system, including limits
on social promotion in elementary
school; introduced a plethora of
school choice initiatives (vouchers for the disabled, vouchers for those in failing
schools, tax - credit funded scholarships for the needy, virtual education, and a growing number of charter
schools); asked
school districts to pay teachers according to merit; promoted a «Just Read» initiative; ensured parental
choice among providers of preschool services; and created a highly regarded
system for tracking student achievement.
Osborne explains that chartering blends parental
choice,
school - level autonomy, and meaningful accountability in a way that produces
school diversity, empowers educators and families, fosters entrepreneurialism, and maintains the
system's focus
on student performance.
Newer programs have developed accountability
systems similar to those for traditional public
schools: the state department of education oversees the
choice program and participating private
schools take state tests, receive letter grades from the state
systems, and are subject to consequences based
on those grades.
As we look at the evidence
on private
school choice — the actual evidence, not speculation — we should consider it in comparison with the continuing epidemic of ethnic segregation in the public
school system.
On the importance of government, for example, Brian Eschbacher, executive director of Planning and Enrollment Services in Denver Public
Schools, described policies and systems in Denver that help make choice work better in the real world: a streamlined enrollment system to make choosing easier for families, more flexible transportation options for families, a common performance framework and accountability system for traditional and charter schools to ensure all areas of a city have quality schools, and a system that gives parents the information they need to choose schools confi
Schools, described policies and
systems in Denver that help make
choice work better in the real world: a streamlined enrollment
system to make choosing easier for families, more flexible transportation options for families, a common performance framework and accountability
system for traditional and charter
schools to ensure all areas of a city have quality schools, and a system that gives parents the information they need to choose schools confi
schools to ensure all areas of a city have quality
schools, and a system that gives parents the information they need to choose schools confi
schools, and a
system that gives parents the information they need to choose
schools confi
schools confidently.
For the present analysis, I aggregate to the district level the data
on racial imbalance at individual
schools from the SRI and link it to the ECCI data
on the
choice systems of large districts.