Sentences with phrase «school critics often»

Charter school critics often point out that charter schools may be creaming the best students from the traditional schools, ones with fewer disabilities, social and emotional needs and disciplinary issues.

Not exact matches

The discovery of this fact about the Gospels is often popularly attributed to a contemporary school of scholars known as «Form critics,» but the fact was well established long before this particular school emerged and rests upon grounds considerably wider and firmer than those which support this school's particular claims.

Many education reform advocates have not fully embraced the phrase, which is often used by critics of charter schools that promote strict, zero - tolerance discipline codes.

In this country where critics and the public often cite the low quality of education, especially for the poor, localized funding for public schools and a proliferation of expensive private schools creates a vast divide between poorer and richer students» schools.

Teachers told me that most NovaNET courses are comparable to textbook - based courses in length and content — a comeback to critics who talk of watered - down curricula at alternative schools — but that many students move through them more quickly, and often finish high school a semester early.

Critics of Christian schools often recount a different history, one that is rooted in the creation of southern segregationist academies to allow white students to escape court - ordered busing.

What's more, critics say, single - sex schools such as the 49ers Academy and the Philadelphia High School for Girls might owe their success to any number of factors: smaller class sizes, specialized teachers, and a higher public profile, which often brings extra revenue.

Critics often suggest that superior performance in the charter sector is a result of high levels of attrition, caused by implicit or explicit efforts on the part of school staff to «counsel out» the students who are hardest to educate.

Nevertheless, critics of private education often implicitly extend the limited definition of «public» to mean the population served by the school.

This is important to appreciate, for critics of school choice often ask where students are going to go once the «good schools» are all full.

In Final Exam: A Study of the Perpetual Scrutiny of American Schools, I reviewed the tendency, especially strong since the end of World War II, for critics to think the worst about our schools, often while lionizing the educational systems of other nSchools, I reviewed the tendency, especially strong since the end of World War II, for critics to think the worst about our schools, often while lionizing the educational systems of other nschools, often while lionizing the educational systems of other nations.

Critics (often including ourselves) typically assert that these organizations are the prime obstacles to needed reforms in K — 12 schooling, while defenders (typically, also, supporters of the education status quo) insist that they are bulwarks of professionalism and safeguards against caprice and risky innovation.

Many no excuses charter schools have high test scores, but critics are often skeptical that those scores will translate into outcomes that really matter.

Affirming Rogers» earlier point, the Globe article noted, «Middle schools were conceived in the 1970s and»80s as a nurturing bridge from early elementary grades to high school, but critics say they now more often resemble a swamp, where urban youth sink into educational failure.»

«Governments have seemed unwilling to have a key school reform rigorously tested against the evidence, and too often the critics have also wanted to make their case without reference to the emerging data on how structural change is impacting on attainment and value added.

Critics often cite the difficulty of comparing the results of large and small schools and comparing one subject with another.

Critics of that impulsive response, which has been in high gear nationwide since the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings in December, acknowledge the concern for student and staff safety that drives the addition of school resource officers, as such police are often School shootings in December, acknowledge the concern for student and staff safety that drives the addition of school resource officers, as such police are often school resource officers, as such police are often known.

Critics of school choice often claim that parents ignore quality when evaluating schools and draw their conclusions on the basis of the school's racial or ethnic composition.

Critics say that charters sap resources and siphon off motivated students from under - resourced district schools, which are often already serving poor and low - performing students.

Critics of vouchers often portray their proponents as white conservatives bent on transforming public schools into open markets, exploiting them to make profits to the detriment of poor black children.

Critics of voucher programs often argue that private schools do exclude most disabled students, and the matter occasionally has been the subject of litigation.

Supporters of choice claim that parents look mainly for the best academic opportunity for their children; critics charge that parents will just as often search for a school on the basis of ethnic, religious, or ideological preferences, the quality of the sports program, or how blue the student body's blood is.

Stakeholders could actually check to see whether districts were prioritizing school sites or holding onto dollars intended for high - need students to spend on other obligations such as pension and benefit increases (as critics often claim).

School choice critics often claim that there is too much ideology, too little research, or fixed results because of researchers «cherry - picking» students.

«Every year I was in the classroom in some way,» said Miller, which is especially important because critics of teacher preparation programs usually point to the fact that in traditional schools of education, students often don't get to teach in a classroom until their senior year — a point in time when students find out too late that teaching may not be for them.

Critics contend that charters have not lived up to their promises of innovation and performance, and often claim resources that otherwise would go to more deserving traditional schools.

Collegiate's academies haven't been without their critics, who often point out that the schools have some of the district's highest out - of - school suspension rates.

Charter critics often point to data showing that only 17 percent of charters outperform nearby traditional public schools, but proponents say closures are evidence that charter - school laws are working.

Critics point to a report released last week showing how school districts in San Mateo and Santa Clara counties ignore objective data like test scores and grades, and they often place black and Latino ninth - graders in math classes below their level.

Voucher and charter - school critics say the neediest kids - those who struggle academically or behaviorally or whose parents don't have the wherewithal to shop around for private schools or provide transportation to a far - flung school - often aren't able to exercise choice in a meaningful way.

It's notable that critics often claim that schools have high fixed costs.

Critics of charter schools have often pointed to those schools» ability to expel uncooperative and disruptive students, far more readily than regular public schools can, as a reason for some charter schools» far better educational outcomes, as shown on many tests.

Critics often say that we should run our school system like a business.

The debate about school choice is often animated in the United States, but critics of the idea may be surprised to learn that school voucher programs are quite common in the rest of the economically developed world.

Critics of vocational schools often point to the absence of academics and an overfocus of programs on simply getting people to work.

This reformation has radically changed the knowledge production within the art school often resulting in the fact that the art school / universities are more producing intellectuals who then become artists or even critics, curators, gallery workers or other kind of professionals within the art world.