The full report documents
how school finance policy choices at the federal, state, and district levels systematically stack the deck against students who need the most support...
The full report documents how
school finance policy choices at the federal, state, and district levels systematically stack the deck against students who need the most support from their schools.
In addition, analyses of existing
state school finance policies and the positions AEF promotes to obtain greater fairness for taxpayers and students, alike, can be found here.
On Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 10 am, the Urban Institute hosted a panel discussion
on school finance policies and inequality.
[2] As with
any school finance policy, however, the specific details of any portability proposal would be critical.
School financing policies should be driven by an analysis of what it costs to raise the bar and close the gap in student achievement, bringing teaching and learning opportunities in all schools up to a high standard.
The four economic factors highlighted here are insufficient to explain what has happened in these states, as current tax and
school finance policies, partisan divides, union influence, and many other state - level features contributed to the strikes that are now happening.
As we continue our pre-election examination of
school finance policies, we focus on the second half of the Center for American Progress (CAP) report, The Stealth Inequities of School Funding: How State and Local School Finance Systems Perpetuate Inequitable Student Spending.