This document presents a brief explanation of the goal
of school finance reforms, followed by summaries of the main bodies of evidence that illustrate how equitable and adequate school funding improves student outcomes.
This project will examine state -
level school finance reforms, intended to increase funding for schools serving poor children, over the past several decades.
While
school finance reforms did successfully reduce achievement gaps between high - and low - income districts, they did not have measurable impacts on gaps between high - and low - income students.
The study, based on nationwide data, found that
school finance reforms lead to substantial increases in revenues in low - income school districts, and to increases in student achievement.
The recently completed state budget was made tough because of a lack of revenues;
positive school finance reform requires adequate, sustainable and equitable revenue sources.
This is the most important question
about school finance reform, but has been the hardest to answer due in large part to a shortage of nationally comparable student achievement data.
This article is based on «The Effects of School Spending on Educational and Economic Outcomes: Evidence
from School Finance Reforms,» The Quarterly Journal of Economics (forthcoming).
A comprehensive Education Savings Account program would not only help address these issues, but can also serve as a template
for school finance reform in Texas.
The last time Texas had a commission
on school finance reform in the 1980's, it studied how much it cost to fund a high quality education.
It should not come as surprise that even after the extraordinarily ambitious
school finance reform legislation is fully implemented, in some — and perhaps even in many — districts the quality of a student's education will still be dependent on where a child is born, and on the wealth of his or her parents.
Less than a week after the state Legislature approved a
sweeping school finance reform plan that will funnel additional funds to low - income students and English learners, the state's finance chief says school districts will have to spend the extra funds in a way «that shows improved outcomes» among their students.
Superfine's research interests have focused on the intersection of education law and policy,
school finance reform law and policy, standards - based reform and accountability policies, and the role of science in the educational policy process.
Following the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court reversal of the Rodríguez decision that found the Texas system of school finance unconstitutional, he resigned from the Edgewood ISD to establish IDRA to
advocate school finance reform and improved educational opportunities for all children.
It is this unique North Carolina history and law that allow
school finance reform at the state level to be a real game changer in each school child's opportunities, regardless of zip code.
The report discounts a significant body of peer - reviewed research that specifically shows positive effects of previous
Michigan school finance reforms, including positive effects on state assessments and / educational attainment, concentrated on those students who attended, before those reforms, the lowest funded schools or lower performing schools.
We should not assume that
school finance reforms directed at resolving resource inequalities between school districts will ensure those resources are equitably distributed among schools and their students.
The legal theory
underlying school finance reform is predicated to a significant degree on the principle that local school districts are essentially agencies of the states, charged with providing the education mandated by the state's constitution.
We study the impact of
post-1990 school finance reforms, during the so - called «adequacy» era, on the distribution of school spending and student achievement between high - income and low - income school districts.
During the late 1970s and early 1980s, a majority of states substantially changed the ways in which schools were funded, either directly through courtor legislatively
mandated school finance reform,
Finally, the empirical analysis included in the report lacks depth and rigor when compared to four other studies — three of which were peer - reviewed — each of which find positive effects of
prior school finance reforms in Michigan.
We stand by their endeavors to
secure school finance reform and improve education outcomes and opportunities for our public school children, especially those who are at - risk, English language learners, and students with disabilities and other special needs.
Using over 20 years of National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) data on revenue and expenditures for schools, the authors explore the relationship between substantive and
sustained school finance reforms and improved student outcomes.
Emails obtained by CMD from Gov. Ducey's office reveal that he (and his predecessor) helped propel a secret «
School Finance Reform Team»... The stated goal was for everyone on the school reform team to use their «different contacts to help get... legislation,» which would effectively divert more money from public schools to charter school coffers passed.
Fiscally Responsible FCSBM prioritizes the interests of students, parents, and taxpayers and pursues common -
sense school finance reform to eliminate wasteful spending and advocate for a larger share of education expenditures to be directed into the classroom.
Bringing in national experts on school finance to CO to share what's happened in other states and what has / has not worked can help set the frame for
school finance reform work in our state.
Currently, he is investigating the effects of court - ordered
school finance reform using factor methods applied to panel data, and he is developing techniques for constructing welfare - adjusted NAEP scale scores..
To offer a close examination of the ins and outs of one state's
school finance reform process, WestEd and Education Resource Strategies recently released a case study describing how California passed, and has begun to implement, the LCFF.
To me, it's completely unrelated to the agenda from Brown, which was about getting equal access to educational opportunities for students — you know, initially through desegregation, but the heritage of Brown is also a large number of
school finance reform lawsuits that have been trying to advocate for equitable resource distribution between districts and schools.
This study of California's recent
major school finance reform, the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF), is among the first to provide evidence of LCFF's impacts on student outcomes.