Dr Patricia Mucavele of the Children's Food Trust shares the expert support and advice available to schools implementing the new
school food standards which come into force in January
Not exact matches
A wide variety of meat and fish free alternatives are available, all of
which can meet or exceed the government's nutrition - and
food - based and
standards for
school lunches.
The new
standards ensure that children can enjoy nutritious
food at
school which supports their health and education.
I don't think there's a
school food advocate out there who doesn't believe districts are sorely underfunded and under - equipped, the very obstacles
which make compliance with the nutritional
standards harder.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture reports that over 95 percent of districts are now meeting the
standards,
which sounds like a resounding success, but to bolster its own campaign to roll back reforms, the
School Nutrition Association (SNA) has tended to emphasize all the obstacles districts reportedly face, from lost revenue to increased
food waste.
So instead of worrying about DeVos, we really should be focusing on: (1) Congressional Republicans, who've already shown great enthusiasm for weakening the nutrition
standards for
school meals and limiting their accessibility to low - income kids (see my Civil Eats piece, «3 Things You Need to Know About the House School Food Bill «-RRB-; (2) the as - yet - unscheduled confirmation hearing for Agriculture Secretary nominee Sonny Perdue, during which we're likely to get more information on how he views the NSLP; and (3) whoever eventually is appointed Under Secretary for Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services, the USDA official directly in charge of child nutrition pro
school meals and limiting their accessibility to low - income kids (see my Civil Eats piece, «3 Things You Need to Know About the House
School Food Bill «-RRB-; (2) the as - yet - unscheduled confirmation hearing for Agriculture Secretary nominee Sonny Perdue, during which we're likely to get more information on how he views the NSLP; and (3) whoever eventually is appointed Under Secretary for Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services, the USDA official directly in charge of child nutrition pro
School Food Bill «-RRB-; (2) the as - yet - unscheduled confirmation hearing for Agriculture Secretary nominee Sonny Perdue, during
which we're likely to get more information on how he views the NSLP; and (3) whoever eventually is appointed Under Secretary for
Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services, the USDA official directly in charge of child nutrition programs.
Specifically, the SNA sought to: gut the new whole grain
standard from 100 percent «whole grain - rich» to 50 percent; halt further sodium reductions in
school food; and revert to the old system under
which kids could pass up all fruits and vegetables a lunch, instead of being required to take a half - cup serving.
«As a former dinner lady, I know how much it helps that these new
school food standards —
which all
schools, including academies, will be called on to meet — have been made simpler so that Cooks have some room to be creative in coming up with nutritious menus that students will enjoy.
Back in 2010 Congress adopted greatly improved
school food standards, which received bipartisan support as well as the endorsement of the School Nutrition Association (SNA), the nation's leading organization of 55,000 school food professi
school food standards,
which received bipartisan support as well as the endorsement of the
School Nutrition Association (SNA), the nation's leading organization of 55,000 school food professi
School Nutrition Association (SNA), the nation's leading organization of 55,000
school food professi
school food professionals.
Promulgated by the Texas Department of Agriculture (TDA), the agency
which administers the state's federal
school lunch program, the «Texas School Nutrition Policy» regulates the time and place in which competitive foods and beverages may be sold and also sets nutrition standards for those
school lunch program, the «Texas
School Nutrition Policy» regulates the time and place in which competitive foods and beverages may be sold and also sets nutrition standards for those
School Nutrition Policy» regulates the time and place in
which competitive
foods and beverages may be sold and also sets nutrition
standards for those items.
Meanwhile, the House Appropriations subcommittee yesterday released its fiscal year 2015 agriculture appropriations bill,
which included language that would allow any
school district
which operated its meal program at a loss for at least six months this past
school year to seek a waiver from compliance in the coming year with the new, healthier
school food standards.
It wasn't long before the two groups» talking points mirrored each other perfectly, with each espousing a pressing need for «flexibility» in
school food programs, a goal
which sounds innocuous but really means throwing science - based nutrition
standards out the window, despite growing evidence of their success in improving the diets of 31 million
school kids each day.
Now the new snack
standards end up being all about tweaked fat grams and calories instead of the true intention —
which was to provide better quality
foods to kids in
schools.
Bw1: In the context of
school food and
food served in classrooms (the two main areas on
which you and I have clashed in the past), I'm always a little baffled that you accuse me of trying to «use government» to promote my values when in fact these are governmental institutions and programs (
schools and the NSLP) for
which standards and rules must necessarily be set.
Academies do not have to apply the
standards which safeguard
school food.
06.27.2013 HUMAN Healthy Vending Aligns with USDA to Provide «Smart Snacks in
School» Nationwide Today, the USDA finalized its national school nutrition standards for «competitive foods,» which are all foods and beverages sold to students on campus during the school day, typically through vending machines, a la carte lunch lines and in student s
School» Nationwide Today, the USDA finalized its national
school nutrition standards for «competitive foods,» which are all foods and beverages sold to students on campus during the school day, typically through vending machines, a la carte lunch lines and in student s
school nutrition
standards for «competitive
foods,»
which are all
foods and beverages sold to students on campus during the
school day, typically through vending machines, a la carte lunch lines and in student s
school day, typically through vending machines, a la carte lunch lines and in student stores.
But as it turns out, I'd inadvertently launched a blog that was (partially) about
school food right during the 2010 Child Nutrition Reauthorization (CNR), the springboard from
which First lady Michelle Obama and a host of advocates were trying to improve outdated
school meal nutrition
standards.
The First Lady championed the transformation of the
school food environment through the Healthy, Hunger - Free Kids Act,
which updated
school meal nutrition
standards for the first time in 15 years and increased funding for the first time in 30 years.
This group is specifically advocating for HR 1324 and S. 934: «Child Nutrition Promotion and
School Lunch Protection Act of 2009,» which amends the Child Nutrition Act to require the Secretary of Agriculture to establish science - based nutrition standards for foods served in schools other than foods served under the school lunch or breakfast pro
School Lunch Protection Act of 2009,»
which amends the Child Nutrition Act to require the Secretary of Agriculture to establish science - based nutrition
standards for
foods served in
schools other than
foods served under the
school lunch or breakfast pro
school lunch or breakfast programs.
As I outlined in a piece for Civil Eats, the House CNR bill would have seriously undermined key
school food provisions, including taking a decidedly anti-science approach to
school nutrition
standards, significantly limiting the Community Eligibility Provision (
which provides free meals to students in low - income areas without paperwork or stigma) and opening the junk
food floodgates on
school campuses by gutting the Smart Snacks rules for competitive
food.
Still another policy called for by SNA would extend the comment period on the «Smart Snacks in
Schools»
standards which, for the first time ever, will (beginning July 1st) impose some regulations on «competitive
foods» sold at
school outside of federal meal programs, including at a la carte snack bars, vending machines, and student stores.
A special exemption to the
standards is allowed for
foods and beverages that do not meet competitive
food standards but
which are sold for the purpose of conducting infrequent
school - sponsored fundraisers.
The new
standards,
which go into effect July 1, mark the first time the U.S. Department of Agriculture program will directly dictate nutrition for any
food sold in
schools during the
school day — not just the traditional lunches and breakfasts long subsidized through the federal
school lunch program.
The SNA,
which represents
school food workers across the nation, has always been heavily funded and influenced by the very
food industry giants who stand to lose money when healthier
school nutrition
standards are enacted.
The Agriculture Department's «Smart Snacks»
standards,
which took effect on July 1, 2014, represent the first major updates to national guidelines for
school snack
foods and beverages in more than 30 years.
In January 2012, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or USDA, finalized its updated nutritional
standards for
school meals in keeping with the Healthy Hunger - Free Kids Act of 2010 (Public Law No. 111 - 296),
which reauthorized the
school meal programs and placed an emphasis on the need to improve access to healthy
foods in
schools.
Based on a nationally representative survey of
food service directors, the report,
School Meal Programs Innovate to Improve Student Nutrition, sheds light on
which approaches have been most effective during the multiyear transition to healthier
food and drink
standards issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture since 2011.
Food service directors reported uneven progress toward district - wide compliance with the Smart Snacks in
School nutrition
standards,
which govern items sold in cafeteria a la carte lines, vending machines, snack bars, and at fundraisers.
She tells us trash cans are «overflowing» with healthful
food, but did she read three recent studies — from the Harvard
School of Public Health, the University of Connecticut and the Baylor College of Medicine —
which found no increased plate waste due to the implementation of the new meal
standards?
The developments at D.C. Central Kitchen converge precisely with the public
school system's recent efforts to introduce fresher, healthier
foods, as well as the «Healthy
Schools Act» approved earlier this year by the D.C. Council,
which not only raises nutritional
standards for
school food but provides bonus funding for every meal that contains a locally grown component.
She tells us trash cans are «overflowing» with healthful
food, but did she read three recent studies — from the Harvard
School of Public Health, the University of Connecticut and the Baylor College of Medicine,
which found no increased plate waste due to the implementation of the new meal
standards?
The Department for Education has recently published revised funding agreements for new academies and free
schools,
which include the requirement to follow the
school food standards.
Effective
food policy actions are part of a comprehensive approach to improving nutrition environments, defined as those factors that influence
food access.1 Improvements in the nutritional quality of all
foods and beverages served and sold in
schools have been recommended to protect the nutritional health of children, especially children who live in low - resource communities.2 As legislated by the US Congress, the 2010 Healthy Hunger - Free Kids Act (HHFKA) updated the meal patterns and nutrition
standards for the National
School Lunch Program and the School Breakfast Program to align with the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.3 The revised standards, which took effect at the beginning of the 2012 - 2013 school year, increased the availability of whole grains, vegetables, and fruits and specified weekly requirements for beans / peas as well as dark green, red / orange, starchy, and other veget
School Lunch Program and the
School Breakfast Program to align with the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.3 The revised standards, which took effect at the beginning of the 2012 - 2013 school year, increased the availability of whole grains, vegetables, and fruits and specified weekly requirements for beans / peas as well as dark green, red / orange, starchy, and other veget
School Breakfast Program to align with the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.3 The revised
standards,
which took effect at the beginning of the 2012 - 2013
school year, increased the availability of whole grains, vegetables, and fruits and specified weekly requirements for beans / peas as well as dark green, red / orange, starchy, and other veget
school year, increased the availability of whole grains, vegetables, and fruits and specified weekly requirements for beans / peas as well as dark green, red / orange, starchy, and other vegetables.
Yesterday the House Appropriations Committee approved the fiscal 2015 spending bill with controversial language, drafted by Rep. Robert Aderholt (R - AL),
which would allow struggling
schools to request a 12 - month waiver from complying with healthier
school food standards.
«We are delighted with the positive response to the recipe hub,
which shows exciting ways to meet the
school food standards whilst also meeting the required nutrition criteria of the Government Buying Standards for Food and Catering Services (GBSF).&ra
food standards whilst also meeting the required nutrition criteria of the Government Buying
Standards for
Food and Catering Services (GBSF).&ra
Food and Catering Services (GBSF).»
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) reports that over 95 percent of districts are now meeting the
standards,
which sounds like a resounding success, but to bolster its own campaign to roll back reforms, the
School Nutrition Association (SNA) has tended to emphasize all the obstacles districts reportedly face, from lost revenue to increased
food waste.
Setting the table All maintained
schools must be able to demonstrate that they meet the
food - based
standards, that is the requirements outlining
which foods and drinks can be provided both at lunchtime and right across the
school day.
Where a
school works with an external caterer,
food quality is verified through the Food for Life Catering Mark, which allows schools to demonstrate that the food they serve is nutritious, locally sourced and meets the school food standa
food quality is verified through the
Food for Life Catering Mark, which allows schools to demonstrate that the food they serve is nutritious, locally sourced and meets the school food standa
Food for Life Catering Mark,
which allows
schools to demonstrate that the
food they serve is nutritious, locally sourced and meets the school food standa
food they serve is nutritious, locally sourced and meets the
school food standa
food standards.
Jamie Oliver said of the new
standards: «Anything
which makes it easier for
school cooks to get tastier, nutritious food on the plate at school lunch time has to be welcomed and the new School Food Standards guide does
school cooks to get tastier, nutritious
food on the plate at school lunch time has to be welcomed and the new School Food Standards guide does t
food on the plate at
school lunch time has to be welcomed and the new School Food Standards guide does
school lunch time has to be welcomed and the new
School Food Standards guide does
School Food Standards guide does t
Food Standards guide does that.
So, in order to provide suitable hosts it is important that they have sufficient information provided,
which should include: name, age and gender of pupils, plus any special requirements such as
food, medical or cultural issues; minimum
standards of accommodation required; information on the dynamic risk management process to ensure it can operate effectively; the visiting
school's code of conduct; and contact numbers, including emergency contacts and medical insurance information.
They told us the new
standards were easier and more intuitive to use to plan interesting and creative menus,
which has got to be great news for children and
school food.
Next steps The next steps a
school has to take is to get help with using the new
school food standards, which can be found on the Childrens Food Trust website, as seen be
food standards,
which can be found on the Childrens
Food Trust website, as seen be
Food Trust website, as seen below.
Jamie Oliver has backed the new
standards claiming that: «Anything
which makes it easier for
school cooks to get tastier, nutritious food on the plate at school lunch time has to be welcomed and the new School Food Standards guide does that&r
school cooks to get tastier, nutritious
food on the plate at school lunch time has to be welcomed and the new School Food Standards guide does that&raq
food on the plate at
school lunch time has to be welcomed and the new School Food Standards guide does that&r
school lunch time has to be welcomed and the new
School Food Standards guide does that&r
School Food Standards guide does that&raq
Food Standards guide does that».
The new
school food standards,
which will be mandatory from January 2015, are designed to make it easier for
school cooks to create imaginative, flexible and nutritious menus.
Clearly children's diets need attention, and there have been a number of initiatives to break the unhealthy eating habit, including: The National Healthy
Schools Programme (1998 to 2009), which included healthy and nutritious foods being made available in school canteens and vending machines; The School Food Plan, (launched in 2015), which provided a new set of standards for all food served in schools, offering children more healthy, balanced diets, and withdrawing the provision of unhealthy snacks and drinks in school vending machines; and the much - publicised new sugar tax, which will be imposed on companies according to the sugar content of the energy and fizzy drinks they p
Schools Programme (1998 to 2009),
which included healthy and nutritious
foods being made available in
school canteens and vending machines; The School Food Plan, (launched in 2015), which provided a new set of standards for all food served in schools, offering children more healthy, balanced diets, and withdrawing the provision of unhealthy snacks and drinks in school vending machines; and the much - publicised new sugar tax, which will be imposed on companies according to the sugar content of the energy and fizzy drinks they pr
school canteens and vending machines; The
School Food Plan, (launched in 2015), which provided a new set of standards for all food served in schools, offering children more healthy, balanced diets, and withdrawing the provision of unhealthy snacks and drinks in school vending machines; and the much - publicised new sugar tax, which will be imposed on companies according to the sugar content of the energy and fizzy drinks they pr
School Food Plan, (launched in 2015), which provided a new set of standards for all food served in schools, offering children more healthy, balanced diets, and withdrawing the provision of unhealthy snacks and drinks in school vending machines; and the much - publicised new sugar tax, which will be imposed on companies according to the sugar content of the energy and fizzy drinks they prod
Food Plan, (launched in 2015),
which provided a new set of
standards for all
food served in schools, offering children more healthy, balanced diets, and withdrawing the provision of unhealthy snacks and drinks in school vending machines; and the much - publicised new sugar tax, which will be imposed on companies according to the sugar content of the energy and fizzy drinks they prod
food served in
schools, offering children more healthy, balanced diets, and withdrawing the provision of unhealthy snacks and drinks in school vending machines; and the much - publicised new sugar tax, which will be imposed on companies according to the sugar content of the energy and fizzy drinks they p
schools, offering children more healthy, balanced diets, and withdrawing the provision of unhealthy snacks and drinks in
school vending machines; and the much - publicised new sugar tax, which will be imposed on companies according to the sugar content of the energy and fizzy drinks they pr
school vending machines; and the much - publicised new sugar tax,
which will be imposed on companies according to the sugar content of the energy and fizzy drinks they produce.
In the short time since the introduction of national
standards for
school food, primary
school pupils are already eating more of their 5 - a-day at
school and are being offered a lunch
which is lower in fat, sugar and salt than the average lunch of 2005.
Furthermore, a recent investigation by the
Food Standards Agency (FSA) found that hundred of school kitchens across the country are failing to meet basic standards of cleanliness, which can significantly increase the risks of food - related illnes
Food Standards Agency (FSA) found that hundred of
school kitchens across the country are failing to meet basic
standards of cleanliness,
which can significantly increase the risks of
food - related illnes
food - related illnesses.