Tesseract Group Inc., a pioneer in the growing business of managing
public schools for profit, is facing a mounting barrage of bad news.
In 2006, widespread student protests of inequalities in the education system prompted debate over whether entrepreneurs should be able to own and run private
voucher schools for profit.
«The Tories want to run
schools for profit and bring back grammar schools: that is their priority.
And we've proved in government we stand up for fairness by blocking Tory plans to: run
schools for profit, to pay public servants less simply because they work in Wales, and to allow employees to be fired without cause; while in Wales we have opposed Tory plans to make patients pay to use the NHS.
Politicians and «Faux - reformers» want teacher evaluation, standardized tests, and
schools for profit.
On one side, Edison and other privatization enthusiasts believe that running
schools for profit will give educators greater incentives to raise achievement.
The report also showed that 70 percent of voters said that «Stopping Wall Street and corporations from taking over
schools for profits» was important in their decision - making process, with 56 percent rating it as a top priority.
But no to running
schools for profit, not in our state - funded education sector.»
The evidence shows Michael Gove was in favour of running
schools for profit and the document he was championing, «Blocking the Best» by Policy Exchange, said turning state schools into ones that were technically «independent» would allow them to outsource to for - profit education providers.
It recommended running
schools for profit.
Sweden has its share of scepticism about running
schools for profit.
It paves the way for running
schools for profit.