(Longtime education wonks may remember a similar situation in New York City from the early days of the Bloomberg / Klein era, when their brand - new
school grading system labeled some of Gotham's most sought - after schools as failures.
Not exact matches
States have joined those two standardized testing groups to give exams on Common Core standards — West Virginia is set to give a Smarter Balanced version for the first time this spring, though the state will delay, for at least this
school year and the next,
labeling schools with its new A-F
grading system, which is based in part on the test.
She'd like to dismantle the current A-F
grading system, which she says has a detrimental effect on communities whose
schools have been
labeled as «failing.»
Too many students leave high
school ill prepared for college and careers, even though traditional
grading systems label many of them top performers.
An issue brief released today by the Public
School Forum of North Carolina says the current A-F
School Performance
Grading system only serves to
label schools based on the family income of the students served and does not provide support to help struggling
schools...
There would still be low - performing
schools under such a
system, but the emphasis in such a
system would shift to action to help struggling
schools, rather than focusing so intently on letter
grades and
labels with little corresponding funding or support.
Likewise, states could propose the measures, component weights, and
labels within their new accountability
systems — some went with A — F
school grades, while others kept a
system of performance targets similar to NCLB, developed a point
system for ranking
schools, or created other approaches.
Like many educators, Eiler says the
system has a key flaw: Under the new
system, students can achieve very high scores on the ISTEP, but still be
labeled «low growth,» potentially harming the
school's letter
grade.