Not exact matches
Furthermore, under the general welfare provision of the Constitution, the Federal Government offers financial assistance to states and local communities for a variety of educational purposes, ranging from
subsidies for
school lunch programs to salaries for teachers of agriculture and loans for
school building construction.
It involved the problem of free public transportation for students attending parochial
schools, and it also involved the possibility of parochial students receiving various forms of Federal
subsidy for such things as
school lunches and textbooks.
Few students on the team, from what I could tell, faced quite the daunting array of disadvantages and obstacles that the average student at Fenger High
School in Roseland did, but with 87 percent of IS 318's students eligible for federal lunch subsidies, the school had come by its Title I designation hon
School in Roseland did, but with 87 percent of IS 318's students eligible for federal
lunch subsidies, the
school had come by its Title I designation hon
school had come by its Title I designation honestly.
But I do think there's a role for government at the macro level (where it already has great influence over our food) such as corn and soy
subsidies, the National
School Lunch Program (and the related use of surplus farm commodities), etc..
Government intervention is behind corn
subsidies, behind automobile and highway
subsidies, and behind cheap, processed food for
school lunches, to name just a few instances.
In order to get the cash
subsidies, the
schools have to provide
lunches that meet the federal requirements AND provide free or reduced - price
lunches to eligible students.
Thanks to federal and state cash
subsidies and surplus commodities provided free by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, every high
school student in Illinois can purchase a five - component
lunch for $ 1.40.
As the vast majority of students who eat
school lunch are qualified for free / reduced, it really doesn't cost any more to also make that meal available for purchase by students whose families don't qualify for govt
subsidy.
Think crop
subsidies, expanding portion sizes, food lobbyists, and issues with the National
School Lunch Program.
But my point is, the
school lunch program rests on
subsidies, free commodity food, and governmental reimbursement.
Schools that choose to take part in the National
School Lunch Program get cash
subsidies and donated foods from the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
District 214 said it wants to cut itself loose from National
School Lunch and the $ 900,000
subsidy it receives because most of its food service revenue comes from the a la carte menu, which sells things like pizza, fries and Subway sandwiches and generates $ 2.2 million.
The National
School Lunch program exists to serve low - income children (those receiving federal meal
subsidies), and among that group, participation has actually increased.
I applaud the effort and vision, but the deplorable state of most
school lunches is a consequence of agricultural
subsidies.
Between 1995 and 2006, the farm program paid out $ 140.2 billion in crop
subsidies — an average of $ 12 billion per year, or roughly equal to the annual
school -
lunch budget.
Similarly, it seems silly to talk about rising obesity rates and increasing portion sizes without taking into account crop
subsidies that not make it possible to buy 64 ounces (500 calories) of a soft drink for a mere two dollars, but also explain why
school lunches across the country are trays full of overly refined ad highly - processed foods.
Washington — The Bush Administration's proposal to reduce the
school -
lunch subsidy for middle - income students would force many
schools to stop serving meals, child - nutrition advocates said last week.
About 80 percent of KIPP students in 15 states and the District have family incomes low enough to qualify for federal
lunch subsidies, and they are all of the hormone - addled middle
school age that makes even teachers at wealthy private
schools tremble.
«Parents of children in poverty are working, trying to put food on the table,» said Edward Kliszus, the superintendent at Port Chester - Rye Union Free
School District in Westchester County, where 61 percent of students are poor enough to qualify for
lunch subsidies.
As part of the Department of Agriculture's National
School Lunch Program (NSLP),
schools can receive cash
subsidies and donated commodities in turn for offering free or reduced - price
lunches to eligible children.
In Michigan, nearly 75 percent of charter
school students are eligible for a free or reduced
lunch, while 48 percent of traditional public
school students are eligible for the
subsidy, according to data from the Michigan Department of Education.
This effect of including federal funds reflects the fact that the bulk of federal education dollars are allocated based largely on the income profile of the communities
schools serve, primarily through federal
subsidies for free and reduced price meals and under Title I of the ESEA.19 But because
subsidies for
school lunch programs are the largest source of federal funds flowing to
schools, those concerned with equity must determine how expenditures of those non-instructional funds are considered.
AppleTree participates in the National
School Lunch Program, which is a national meals
subsidy program.