Whatever the reason, a change in the population of students tested can have an impact on
school test score patterns and signal a weakening in schools» «holding power,» especially for the school's or district's most vulnerable students.
Not exact matches
«And, the
pattern that I saw, over and over again, was
schools that would either devote themselves to getting the kids to
score well on
tests, or they would focus on the culture - and in either case they didn't seem to succeed very well.»
Controlling for student demographics, 8th - grade
test scores, English language skills, special education program participation, free or reduced - price lunch status (a measure of family income), and mobility during middle
school does not alter the basic
patterns of graduation and college attendance seen in the descriptive comparisons.
The
pattern of
test scores in Texas and the nation suggest that consequential accountability — adopted early by Texas, then by more states, and finally by the nation as a whole — was a shock to the U.S.
school system that altered the ecosystem and led to a different outcome than had existed before.
SEATTLE — When Principal Levaun Dennett looked at her elementary
school's
test scores in the spring of 1985, they showed a bleak but familiar
pattern.
A 2008 study of graduation
patterns in Chicago Public
Schools, for example, found that the number of days students were absent in eighth grade was eight times more predictive of freshman year course failure than eighth grade
test scores.
We caution, however, that our analysis is correlational rather than causal, so these
patterns of findings are merely suggestive that socioeconomic
test score gaps persist relatively unabated regardless of the degree of socioeconomic integration at the
school level, and are far from definitive.
This
pattern of
test -
score effects — showing positive results in urban areas with many low - income students, but neutral or even negative effects elsewhere — also appears in a national study of oversubscribed charter middle
schools funded by the U.S. Department of Education.
The
patterns in the teacher assessments mirror those in the
test -
score data: black and Hispanic students start out substantially below whites, and black students lose ground over the first two years of
school, whereas Hispanics maintain their position relative to whites.
If this were true, one would expect the
patterns of
test -
score gains across items to differ for low - versus high - performing students and
schools.
They were also different than discussions of
school - and district - level activities, like Success Academy's
test scores or district staffing
patterns.
Poring over
school records, he noted a
pattern of significantly higher
scores on
tests of academic achievement and cognitive ability, including IQ
tests, up to four years after the program's end.
But we see similar
patterns in charter
schools too: a number of studies have shown that charter
school students have a higher chance of high
school graduation or college enrollment even when their
test scores do not differ on average from their traditional public
school counterparts.
Sometimes,
test score patterns can shift more students into top MCAS levels, creating the illusion of
school wide improvement.
People have suggested these
patterns might be due to: neighborhood / local area / region of family background; other family background characteristics; high
school test scores or high
school quality; quality of college attended; choices of majors and occupations; choice of neighborhood or area to live in after college.
Overall, the city's subsequent Report Card gave Promise Academy middle
school an A. Of course, without a clear understanding of attrition
patterns (at least one kid had been expelled) it would be a mistake to put too much stock in
test score gains.
Children living in poverty have lower
scores on standardized
tests of academic achievement, poorer grades in
school, and lower educational attainment.2, 3 These
patterns persist into adulthood, ultimately contributing to low wages and income.4, 5 Moreover, increased exposure to poverty in childhood is tied to greater deficits in these domains.6, 7 Despite numerous studies demonstrating the relationship between family resources and children's educational outcomes, little is known about mechanisms underlying the influence of poverty on children's learning and achievement.