Sentences with phrase «school than their public school counterparts»

Not exact matches

As a group, public universities in the top 40 performed better than their private counterparts, growing total assets by 44.5 percent compared with 24.7 percent for private schools between the 2008 and 2014 fiscal years.

All this despite the fact that private schooling doesn't actually yield better outcomes for students, according to a recent Statistics Canada report (instead, the apparent academic success of private school student is due to their socioeconomic backgrounds).9 A UBC study also found that students from public schools scored higher in first - year university classes than their private school counterparts.10

Those from non-traditional education environments matriculate in colleges and attain a four - year degree at much higher rates than their counterparts from public and even private schools.

This does not mean that students are not inspired to learn just as much if not more than their public school counterparts do.

Belluck has used his own Twitter handle in recent days to dog the State Education Department over the results of third - through eighth - grade English and math test scores that showed charter school students performing slightly better than their public school counterparts.

City charter schools in public school buildings are far more overcrowded than their district - run counterparts, a new analysis of NYC Education Department data shows.

For decades scholars and public health officials have known that people with greater income or formal education tend to live longer and enjoy better health than their counterparts who have less money or schooling.

Late - and post-menopausal women have significantly greater volumes of fat around their hearts — a risk factor for heart disease — than their pre-menopausal counterparts, a University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health study has shown for the first time.

They found that, initially, charter - school parents rated their children's schools more highly than their public - school counterparts did.

It is also instructive to note that teachers working in private schools quit teaching at a much higher rate than their counterparts in public schools, and almost two - thirds of these leavers rank an increase in salary to be very or extremely important in any possible decision to return to teaching.

For example, a 2010 report by UCLA's Civil Rights Project found that black charter school students were twice as likely to attend schools that enrolled fewer than 10 percent non-minority students as their counterparts in traditional public schools.

Our new findings demonstrate that, while segregation for blacks among all public schools has been increasing for nearly two decades, black students in charter schools are far more likely than their traditional public school counterparts to be educated in intensely segregated settings.

Federal data from NCES offers a potentially surprising revelation: Private school teachers have higher turnover rates than their public school counterparts, and it's not particularly close.

In Chicago, students who attended a charter high school were 7 percentage points more likely to earn a regular high school diploma than their counterparts with similar characteristics who attended a traditional public high school.

Base salaries in the St. Louis Archdiocese's elementary parochial schools are about 45 percent less than in their public school counterparts.

According to a recent evaluation by the RAND Corporation and comparisons in Philadelphia and Baltimore, Edison's record is not very different from that of similar public schools, though it has received greater funding than its public counterparts.

To quote from a famous interview given by James Coleman, cited in this book, «Catholic high schools educate students better than public schools do... students drop out four times more often than their Catholic school counterparts.»

Bluntly put, do students in charter schools learn more than their counterparts in traditional public schools?

Sixty percent of the charter schools studied performed worse than their traditional public school counterparts.

Public school students have more classroom access to the information highway than their private school counterparts, a federal report released last week says.

Based on the findings presented here, the typical student in Michigan charter schools gains more learning in a year than his [traditional public school (TPS)-RSB- counterparts, amounting to about two months of additional gains in reading and math.

Many private schools do lay claim to a broader range of educational goals than do their public - sector counterparts.

And in numerous experimental studies, voucher parents express far more satisfaction with their child's education than do their public - school counterparts — particularly in areas such as discipline and safety.

In general, charter schools that serve low - income and minority students in urban areas are doing a better job than their traditional public - school counterparts in raising student achievement, whereas that is not true of charter schools in suburban areas.

Thus, public school students might have been encouraged to try harder on these tests than their voucher counterparts.

In the 2009 - 10 academic year, for instance, students received approximately 1,360 hours more instructional time than their counterparts in Chicago's public schools, with school schedules resembling those of students in Seoul, Shanghai, or Tokyo.

Similarly, in Louisiana, research after the first and second years of the program found voucher students performed worse than their public school counterparts, but after three years, performance was roughly similar across both groups.

Using data from the Florida Tax Credit (FTC) Scholarship program, we find that low - income Florida students who attended private schools using an FTC scholarship enrolled in and graduated from Florida colleges at a higher rate than their public school counterparts.

In 2006, the National Center for Education Statistics found that public school students do as well as or better than their private school and charter school counterparts.

As he wrote in this year's report: «Scholarship participants tend to be considerably more disadvantaged and lower - performing upon entering the program than their non-participating counterparts (in public schools).

A wealth of evidence shows that children educated in non-public schools are more tolerant and engaged in civics than their public school counterparts.

Private school principals report more influence over curriculum than their public school counterparts report.

Federal data from the National Center on Education Statistics (NCES) offers a potentially surprising revelation: Private school teachers have higher turnover rates than their public school counterparts, and it's not particularly close.

They teach for less than their public school counterparts because their sense of professional efficacy is greater.

A 2006 study by the Department of Education found that charter school fourth graders had lower scores in reading and math on the National Assessment of Education Progress, a federal achievement test, than their counterparts in regular public schools.

GCI also found that charter schools paid teachers on average 20 % less than public school districts while paying administrators significantly more (about 50 % greater than their counterparts in similar - sized public school districts).

Overall, charter high schools, like charter elementary and middle schools serve different populations of students than their public school counterparts (See here).

Back in 1993, the typical hire at a private elementary school had SAT scores that were 4 points higher than her or his public school counterpart.

The policy report also finds that charter school teachers earn 20 percent less than public district school teachers while their executives (often the charter holders) earn on average 50 percent more than their counterparts in similarly - sized public school districts.

Specifically, the data book reports that two public charter schools in Eastern Idaho serve a significantly lower number of Hispanic students than their district counterparts (24 % in public charter vs. 51 % in the Jerome Joint SD, for example).

In fact, public charters are doing better than their district school counterparts at getting these at - risk students to graduate, as can be seen in data from the 2008 high school cohort (students graduating four years later and released in 2013).

A recent Education Department analysis of that program found that after a year in private school, voucher recipients performed worse on standardized tests than their counterparts who remained in public school.

A Stanford study, however, found that 83 percent of the time charter schools perform the same or worse than their public school counterparts.

In 2014, New York City's budget office released a report making the claim that attrition among charter schools of special education students was higher than their district public school counterparts.

In Arizona, second only to California in the number of charter schools statewide, students were 7 percent more likely to be proficient in reading and math, and in Illinois charter students were found to be 21 percent more proficient in math and 16 percent more proficient in reading than their public - school counterparts.

While many claim that heads of schools make less than their corporate counterparts, the truth is that many actually earn more than some public school superintendents do.

In a new study released today by a team of researchers led by Josh Cowen at the University of Kentucky, we learn that voucher students in Milwaukee are more likely to graduate high school and go to a four year college than their counterparts in the Milwaukee Public Schools.

Five years ago, one group of researchers found that charter school students across Chicago and the whole state of Florida scored slightly worse on math tests than their public high school counterparts.

The study of charter schools in 15 states and the District of Columbia found that, nationally, only 17 % of charter schools do better academically than their traditional counterparts, and more than a third «deliver learning results that are significantly worse than their student [s] would have realized had they remained in traditional public schools.»

In order to meet this parental demand for choice and the public's desire for more high quality public educational options for families, three key things must be addressed in California: the funding inequity which results in charter school students being funded at lower levels than their traditional public school counterparts, the lack of equitable facilities for charter school students, and restrictive and hostile authorizing environments such as LAUSD Board Member Steve Zimmer's recent resolution limiting parent choice.