It is unlikely that the basic issues raised in theological
schooling by the pluralism of pluralisms that confronts it will be addressed at their root if the end of theological schooling is defined in so essentialist or formalist a way.
It seems to lead to minimizing the importance of the issues raised for theological
schooling by pluralism.
Not exact matches
Ironically, often it brings with it a temptation to find an underlying unity that will overcome the
pluralism of theological
schools by showing that they all share the same essence.
Can we reconceive theological education in such a way that (1) it clearly pertains to the totality of human life, in the public sphere as well as the private, because it bears on all of our powers; (2) it is adequate to genuine
pluralism, both of the «Christian thing» and of the worlds in which the «Christian thing» is lived,
by avoiding naiveté about historical and cultural conditioning without lapsing into relativism; (3) it can be the unifying overarching goal of theological education without requiring the tacit assumption that there is a universal structure or essence to education in general, or theological inquiry in particular, which inescapably denies genuine
pluralism by claiming to be the universal common denominator to which everything may be reduced as variations on a theme; and (4) it can retrieve the strengths of both the «Athens» and the «Berlin» types of excellent
schooling, without unintentionally subordinating one to the other?
This appears to be what happens, however unintentionally, when issues raised
by pluralism and
by fragmentation are dealt with
by construing theological
schooling as a movement from «source of wisdom» to «wise living,» or from «basis - of - theory» to «application - of - theory,» or from a mode of «inwardness» or «subjectivity» to «outward manifestation and expression.»
Stackhouse,
by contrast, urges that the inadequacy lies in the way in which theological
schooling is incorporating the relevant
pluralism.
Note that in this way Hough and Cobb address issues about the adequacy of theological
schooling to
pluralism precisely
by the way they address issues about the unity of theological education.
Theological education will be adequate to the irreducible
pluralism of modes of experiences of God if it includes within the
school itself a
pluralism of modes of experience of God that are genuinely «other»
by reason of different ethnic, sexual, racial, and social locations.
A review of
Pluralism and American Public Education: No One Way to
School by Ashley Rogers Berner
-- The Triumph of American Painting: A History of Abstract Expressionism (1970)-- The New York
School: The Painters and Sculptors of the 1950s (1978)-- American Art of the 1960s (1988)-- Art of the Postmodern Era: From the Late 1960s to the Early 1990s (1997)-- A Sweeper - Up After Artists: A Memoir
by Irving Sandler (2004)-- From Avant - Garde to
Pluralism: An On - the - Spot History (2006)