As soon as the law was passed, four religious
schools applied for a waiver and all four were approved to take on new voucher students despite their failing grades.
Not exact matches
The
School Boards Association, however, is not as enthusiastic about the possibly of numerous
schools applying for and receiving
waivers.
The State Board of Regents voted to permit
schools who find the deadline too tight to
apply for a
waiver for a one year delay.
Three quarters of
school districts in New York State have
applied for waivers from the new teacher evaluation rules set out by Governor Andrew Cuomo and the legislature in March.
Three - quarters of
school districts in the state have
applied for waivers from the new teacher evaluation rules set out by Gov.Andrew Cuomo and the legislature in March.
Three quarters of
school districts in the state have
applied for waivers from the new teacher evaluation rules set out by Governor Cuomo and the legislature in March.
While the conditional
waivers are welcomed by many states — 41 have indicated their intent to
apply for them — some analysts are questioning their legal status and effect on
school accountability.
It does permit local
school boards to
apply to the Maryland State Board of Education
for waivers on behalf of their district or individual
schools, which the Board may grant
for a single
school year based on a «compelling justification.»
Columbia Teachers College professor Hank Levin recounts that when the California legislature allowed districts to
apply for waivers if they could demonstrate that laws or rules were hampering
school improvement, «Fewer than 100 [
waivers] were made in the first year» in a state with more than 1,000 districts.
Just
for starters, it would appear that the
waiver «winners» just promised to adopt narrow, prescriptive teacher evaluation and
school improvement policies that
apply to charter
schools as well as district
schools — but not even charter authorities are entirely clear on how this will play out in reality or if these commitments should be taken any more seriously than so many empty promises in the Race to the Top applications.
And, a majority of the states that have
applied for ESEA
waivers to opt - out of the current No Child Left Behind (NCLB) accountability system include
school climate and / or prosocial education as part of their desired alternative accountability system.
River Glen Elementary
School applied for and received a
waiver to continue its two - way bilingual immersion program despite the anti-bilingual sentiment in the state.
Although Torlakson noted the
waiver program in his letter to Duncan - saying the «conditional nature» poses a problem
for California - it is unclear if the first - year head of California
schools is
applying for such a
waiver.
Plainfield's
waiver request would
apply only to K - 5 students, who would get PE two times a week with a licensed physical education teacher
for 35 minutes each day across the district's 17 elementary
schools.
Education agencies are allowed to
apply for waivers to hold them hamless from loss of attendance based on local control funding formula (LCFF) funding and instructional time penalties if such disasters as flood, fires or earthquakes result in
school closure.
Earlier this week, a number of civil rights and
school reform groups including Democrats
for Education Reform (or DFER) sent a letter to United States Secretary of Education Arnie Duncan opposing the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
waiver that LAUSD and eight other California
school districts had
applied for.
The Texas
waiver request is of particular interest to education leaders and policy experts, not only because of the state's considerable student population, but also because Texas has suggested that it would
apply for a
waiver without agreeing to all of the college - and career - readiness,
school improvement, and teacher effectiveness reforms that the department is requiring in exchange
for flexibility on key components of the law.
Duncan said he would be open to other districts
applying for waivers in the future but would not permit any of them to piggyback on the CORE
waiver during this
school year.
The state is expected to
apply for a
waiver from some of the stiffest strictures of the federal No Child Left Behind Act, which could bring big changes to how the state tracks and supports its
schools.
While it rolls back NCLB's absurd adequate yearly progress system just as it was about to self - destruct, the new guidelines require states that
apply for waivers to identify up to 15 % of their
schools with the lowest scores
for unproven «turnaround» interventions, «charterization,» or closing.
Recognizing the potential
for an explosion in standardized testing, parents,
school board members and teachers implored the Malloy administration not to
apply for the NCLB
waiver until it assessed the impact on our children and the cost to taxpayers.
Texas has been under intense pressure from
school district leaders and others to
apply for a
waiver, especially since it was announced on Aug. 8, 2012, that the number of Texas campuses that failed to meet AYP in 2012 doubled from the number that failed in 2011, to more than 4,000 campuses.
According to a message from the superintendent to
school districts, the
waiver applies only to those two days right now, and the districts will have to
apply for the
waiver.
The bill also provides that in implementing such a program, a
school district may
apply to the commissioner
for a
waiver from the following:
Automatic closure laws «identify a threshold of minimally - acceptable performance»
for charter
schools;
schools falling below this threshold at the time of renewal, or that remain below this threshold
for a set amount of time, are automatically closed.29 The National Association
for Charter
School Authorizers (NACSA) recommends that at a minimum closure laws define: 1) the number of years of poor performance that prompts school closures; 2) the level of performance that triggers closure; 3) what entity has discretion to make exceptions and the structure of any waiver process; and 4) if applicable, what types of schools can be exempt from closure policies or apply for wa
School Authorizers (NACSA) recommends that at a minimum closure laws define: 1) the number of years of poor performance that prompts
school closures; 2) the level of performance that triggers closure; 3) what entity has discretion to make exceptions and the structure of any waiver process; and 4) if applicable, what types of schools can be exempt from closure policies or apply for wa
school closures; 2) the level of performance that triggers closure; 3) what entity has discretion to make exceptions and the structure of any
waiver process; and 4) if applicable, what types of
schools can be exempt from closure policies or
apply for waivers.
This has caused class sizes to soar, tripling the number of districts that have
applied for and received
waivers, representing nearly 30 percent of all elementary
schools in the state.
Sadly, although laws like the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, or AHERA, exist to regulate asbestos in public spaces like
schools, agencies like the EPA are hamstrung to enforce laws due to budgeting and loopholes, allowing state agencies to
apply for waivers when it comes to asbestos abatement.