There's one month, however, when students in many
schools lose learning time: June.
According to one recent UFT survey of its members, «more than 80 percent of the respondents said students in
their schools lost learning time as a result of other disruptive students.»
Not exact matches
Kids have their lives so structured these days, from after
school tutoring to soccer practice, that free
time to explore and imagine their own games and
learn from their friends is
lost.
At the same
time, their parents attended training sessions to
learn the skills that will ensure that gains made in this inspiring week are not
lost during the
school year.
An investigator for a non-profit law firm told us he enrolled in Saving
Schools to better understand his clients: «I am most interested in
learning about the forces in American education that... graduate significantly underperforming students that too often end up serving adult hard
time, or
losing their lives, in correctional facilities».
But how do
schools find
time for collaborative planning and professional
learning without
losing instructional
time?
I know who should be held accountable when tests cause undue duress in students, students are put into unrealistic pressure - cooker, toxic
learning environments, student needs go unmet due to diverting finances to untested standards, students
lose months of instructional
time due to state - imposed distraction — all this to the full knowledge and concern of
school superintendents, etc, etc
The report's authors contend that the high number of suspensions and the large discrepancies in the populations of students who are suspended are extremely troubling not only because of the
lost learning time, but also because suspensions are a leading indicator of whether a child will drop out of
school and face future incarceration.
Chronic absence is especially challenging for students from low - income communities whose families face greater hurdles to getting to
school and have fewer resources to make up for
lost learning time.
School committee member Amy Middleton urged that the change be implemented in the fall of 2016, noting that «[w] e
lose an hour of quality
learning time each day because children are exhausted by 2 p.m.» The district's two elementary
schools will advance their start
time by one hour to 7:45 a.m..
According to a 20 - year study done at Johns Hopkins University, and cited in a
Time magazine cover story about summer
learning loss, «low - income elementary
school students
lost ground in reading each summer, compared with their higher - income peers, who made progress.»
According to this article on the Harvard Graduate
School of Education's website, students
lose approximately 2.6 months of math
learning over the summer, and teachers have to use class
time to make up for the loss, preventing them from moving forward.
How many
times have you seen students
lose interest in
learning because
school bored them?
«Aggregated data won't show grade &
school - site specific issues,» he continues, «which can cause Districts to focus strictly on average daily attendance (ADA) rates rather than performance predictors, such as absences and
lost learning time.»
One of the key barriers to better classroom performance is that over an average academic career, a foster youth will change
schools six
times and
lose about five months of
learning after each transfer.
Green Dot argues that their in -
school suspension (ISS) is not a
time of
learning lost, but rather a
time of personal and academic growth: