An analysis of 2011 - 12 MEAP results by the Michigan Association of Public School Academies concludes that black urban students perform better in charter
schools than in traditional public schools in both math and reading...
While urban students overall do better in charter
schools than in traditional public schools — a conclusion found by rigorous studies that account for any potential differences in the students going in — the gap varies tremendously from place to place.
Not exact matches
Success Academy also released a fact sheet
in response to the criticism, arguing that its
schools already offer significantly more instructional time
than traditional public schools thanks to longer
schools days and a longer
school year.
Ms Turnely continued: «
In the face of the government's campaign to broaden access to universities, elite
public schools have actually increased the number of pupils they send to Oxbridge over the last five years, whilst ethnic minority students are twice as likely to attend modern universities
than traditional universities.»
But though 80 percent of the charters
in her home state perform worse
than traditional public schools, DeVos — a billionaire whose family has also opposed workers» rights, gay marriage and has contributed heavily to a variety of other right - wing causes — has led the way
in resisting any attempts to regulate or improve Michigan charter performance.
«Our findings reveal that, across all grades and subjects, students
in online charter
schools perform worse on standardized assessments and are significantly less likely to pass Ohio's test for high
school graduation
than their peers
in traditional charter and
traditional public schools,» said McEachin.
Charter
school students
in grades 3 through 8 perform better
than we would expect, based on the performance of comparable students
in traditional public schools, on both the math and reading portions of New York's statewide achievement tests.
These academies receive more freedom
than traditional public schools in return for high levels of accountability.
The MTC's work is not entirely original, though, and takes its lead from a number of
public schools — most notably
in New England — that have been rethinking
traditional methods of assessing students for more
than a decade.
• More
than half of the charter kids studied live
in poverty — higher
than the
traditional public school rate.
[7]
In terms of the proportion of students receiving free - or reduced - price lunch, both magnet and charter schools are less impoverished than traditional public schools in their same districts in most states (exceptions include Nevada for both magnets and charters and Florida and North Carolina for magnets only
In terms of the proportion of students receiving free - or reduced - price lunch, both magnet and charter
schools are less impoverished
than traditional public schools in their same districts in most states (exceptions include Nevada for both magnets and charters and Florida and North Carolina for magnets only
in their same districts
in most states (exceptions include Nevada for both magnets and charters and Florida and North Carolina for magnets only
in most states (exceptions include Nevada for both magnets and charters and Florida and North Carolina for magnets only).
Third, there are important descriptive questions to understand what goes on
in themed magnets — are curricula and instruction different
than in traditional public schools, for instance?
The focal measures
in this table are shown
in the last two columns, where the authors present the percentage of charter
school students (from the entire metropolitan area)
in schools with greater
than 90 percent minority students alongside the similar figure for
traditional public schools.
And we know that, more often
than not, the students attending
traditional public schools in cities are
in intensely segregated
schools.
One - quarter (26 %) of those living with
school - age children have educated at least one of their children
in a setting other
than a
traditional public school.
The results from this study showed a number of charters (17 %) doing significantly better (at the 95 % level)
than the
traditional public schools that fed the charters, but there was an even larger group of charters (37 %) doing significantly worse
in terms of reading and math.
The research team used data from more
than 1,300 8th graders attending 32
public schools in Boston, including
traditional public schools, exam
schools that admit only the city's most academically talented students, and oversubscribed charter
schools.
Strong unions are more successful
than weaker ones
in opposing liberal charter legislation, but once a charter law is adopted, it seems that parents see charters as an avenue for reform
in districts where unions have a strong hold on
traditional public schools.
For example, a 2010 report by UCLA's Civil Rights Project found that black charter
school students were twice as likely to attend
schools that enrolled fewer
than 10 percent non-minority students as their counterparts
in traditional public schools.
According to the authors» own numbers
in Table 20, more
than half (56 percent) of charter
school students attend
school in a city, compared to less
than one - third (30 percent) of
traditional public school students.
• One - quarter of those living with
school - age children have educated at least one of their children
in a setting other
than a
traditional public school.
Instead of asking whether all students
in charter
schools are more likely to attend segregated
schools than are all students
in traditional public schools, we should be comparing the racial composition of charter
schools to that of nearby
traditional public schools.
Our new findings demonstrate that, while segregation for blacks among all
public schools has been increasing for nearly two decades, black students
in charter
schools are far more likely
than their
traditional public school counterparts to be educated
in intensely segregated settings.
Students
in public charter
schools receive $ 5,721 or 29 % less
in average per - pupil revenue
than students
in traditional public schools (TPS)
in 14 major metropolitan areas across the U. S
in Fiscal Year 2014.
Among the study population of charter 8th graders, students who attended a charter high
school in 9th grade are 8 to 10 percentage points more likely to attend college
than similar students who attended a
traditional public high
school.
Here is what we know: students
in urban areas do significantly better
in school if they attend a charter
schools than if they attend a
traditional public school.
To answer this question we examine whether the annual changes
in performance made by
traditional public schools during this period were more positive
in schools with charter
schools nearby
than in schools not facing charter
school competition.
Controlling for key student characteristics (including demographics, prior test scores, and the prior choice to enroll
in a charter middle
school), students who attend a charter high
school are 7 to 15 percentage points more likely to earn a standard diploma
than students who attend a
traditional public high
school.
The average performance composite among
traditional public schools increased from 67 percent
in 1996 — 97 to 75 percent
in 1999 — 2000 as the number of charter
schools in the state increased from 0 to more
than 70.
Among the study population of charter 8th graders, students who attended a charter high
school in 9th grade are 8 to 10 percentage points more likely to attend college
than similar students who attended a
traditional public high
school (see Figure 1).
Traditional public schools received $ 7,000 more per pupil
in local revenues, on average,
than did
public charter
schools.
In Chicago, students who attended a charter high
school were 7 percentage points more likely to earn a regular high
school diploma
than their counterparts with similar characteristics who attended a
traditional public high
school.
These students are much more likely to attend Detroit's
traditional public schools than charters: 18 percent of DPS students have IEPs compared to 10 percent
in charter
schools.
And, finally, do students who attend
traditional public schools subject to competition from charter
schools make larger achievement gains
than they would have
in the absence of charter
schools?
For 90 percent of the 6,576 transfers
in our database, the distance between the charter
school where the student enrolled and the
traditional public school the student attended the previous year is less
than ten miles.
We address three main questions: Do students attending charter
schools in these grades make larger or smaller gains
in achievement
than they would have made
in traditional public schools?
Students
in these grades make considerably smaller achievement gains
in charter
schools than they would have
in traditional public schools, and the negative effects are not limited to
schools in their first year of operation.
Looking separately at the effect of attending a charter
school for exiters reveals that the effect of attending a charter
school is,
in fact, considerably more negative
than for students who were observed first
in a
traditional public school and remained
in a charter
school throughout the study period (see Figure 2).
The key question is whether KIPP's positive effects on learning are attributable to a peer environment that is more conducive to academic achievement
than the peer environment found
in traditional public schools.
While only 14 percent of students
in traditional public schools made nonstructural transfers, the same is true of more
than one - quarter of students
in fifth - year charter
schools and of an even larger share of students
in newer charter
schools.
Second, students who choose to remain
in charter
schools do not continue to make smaller gains
than students
in traditional public schools after their initial year
in a charter
school.
This pattern provides strong evidence that the smaller gains made by these charter
school students are indeed due to the quality of the
schools they attend rather
than to any unobserved differences between charter
school students and students
in traditional public schools.
Today, HCZ works with all seven of the
traditional public elementary
schools in the Zone, serving more
than 2,400 students.
This remains a drop
in the
public school bucket (nationally there were more
than 94,000
public K — 12
schools and more
than 49 million students
in 2007), which is why «market share» is considered a crucial milestone, one of the few ways to pinch
traditional schools in their pocketbooks.
We estimate that private
school choice and intradistrict choice (allowing families to choose any
traditional public school in their district) have the largest potential to expand the sets of
schools to which families have access, with more
than 80 percent of families having at least one of these «choice»
schools within five miles of home.
In Buffalo, charter schools receive $ 9,800 less per pupil than traditional public schools, while in Rochester the gap is $ 6,60
In Buffalo, charter
schools receive $ 9,800 less per pupil
than traditional public schools, while
in Rochester the gap is $ 6,60
in Rochester the gap is $ 6,600.
A study released earlier this month by Mathematica finds that students attending charter high
schools in Florida scored lower on achievement tests
than students
in traditional public schools, but years later, the charter students were more likely to have attended at least two years of college and also had higher earnings.
In many cases, this means a longer school day and a longer school year than those found in a traditional public - school settin
In many cases, this means a longer
school day and a longer
school year
than those found
in a traditional public - school settin
in a
traditional public -
school setting.
The heart of the piece is the claim that Detroit has experienced a dramatic increase
in charter
schools, but those new
schools are no better or often worse
than the
traditional public schools.
Bluntly put, do students
in charter
schools learn more
than their counterparts
in traditional public schools?