It is marking the end of a trail of deceitful, shallow reporting on climate issues by mass media, and denoting the end (hopefully) of widespread propagandistic manipulations of environmental
science by Federal officials.
Not exact matches
As opposed to the thousands and thousands of billboards & church message boards every 50 ft with their snarky comments pushing their beliefs and quite often attacking non -(Jesus) believers and / or
science directly or indirectly, all the millions of people that like to go around constantly «sharing their beliefs» about how everyone who believes differently is gonna be tortured and burned for eternity, or the countless attempts
by local, state, and
federal government
officials to push laws based on those beliefs and to favor those beliefs all over the country.
Among other points of contention, health department employees dismissed an advisory limit for human consumption of PFOA set
by the
federal Environmental Protection Agency, and argued that their differences with the
federal authorities were a matter of «philosophy» and not just
science, according to a senior EPA
official's handwritten notes from a phone conference with state
officials.
The most effective way for scientists across disciplines to stand up for
science is
by reaching out to elected
officials at the local, state and
federal levels to offer evidence and findings to advance understanding of pressing issues from human health to the environment, said Holt and Ornstein.
Mauricio Horn, the visiting Secretariat of Scientific Technological Articulation adviser, spent a month at AAAS, learning about all aspects of AAAS»
Science & Technology Policy Fellowships program, attending its training sessions, meeting with
federal officials who work with the fellows AAAS places in their agencies and attending events sponsored
by former fellows who have organized special topic - specific groups.
The National
Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) began looking into personnel reliability last fall after
officials from the
Federal Bureau of Investigation said that the 2001 anthrax letter attacks had been perpetrated
by U.S. Army researcher Bruce Ivins.
A new essay
by the oversight body of the National
Science Foundation explains what
federal research
officials must do if the United States hopes to remain the world's leading scientific power.
An inventory
by the Bush Administration of
federal efforts to bolster
science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education was too simplistic to be useful, according to a White House
official.
Requested
by the White House Office of
Science and Technology Policy, the report draws on discussions at a two - day conference last spring that brought together scientists,
officials from city and state governments, business leaders and representatives of
federal agencies.
The chunk of the
federal budget that includes most of the U.S. government's spending on basic
science would shrink
by 10.5 % in 2018 under a plan outlined today
by President Donald Trump and administration
officials.
For several years, a slowly increasing number of engineers, architects, and physical scientists have joined together to dispute the truth of the
official explanations proposed for 9/11
by the U.S.
federal government (see: «
Science at 9/11» at: http://www.ae911truth.org).
The department was sued in both state and
federal court
by the Institute for Creation Research after state education
officials sought to bar the school from awarding master's degrees in
science beginning in 1988.
The disconnect between those math and
science education proposals, signed into law
by President Bush last summer, and
federal officials» inability to fund them was a central topic at a summit of corporate leaders, scientists, and a select group of lawmakers who met here last week.
White House and Climate Change
Science Program
officials have never offered an honest public explanation of why the terms of that dismissal would have legally required (as distinct from an unofficial, secret political agreement) that the White House and the
federal agencies suppress a taxpayer - funded, scientifically based assessment sponsored
by the
federal global change research program, even for purposes of using it as a scientific document or in program planning for research and future assessments.