I would align myself with you against the positions of Dulles and Schonborn (and Gilson) insofar as they say that modern
science by its very nature excludes the consideration of formality.
Science by its very nature celebrates attempts to overthrow established results, which unavoidably makes our work look «noisy» and confusing to a non-specialist, obscuring for those outside a field what is actually well - founded inside the field.
In fact,
science by its very nature is skeptical.
...
science by its very nature (luckily for humanity) is on the extreme edge of human knowledge and is open for checking and changing.
Not exact matches
If you are repelled
by the ambiguous and speculative
nature of this
very sound
science, then any of these open questions will allow you to shove back the whole messy enterprise.
Not at all Naked... it seems to me
very difficult to have lengthy discussions of researched
science, math, philosophy, archaeology, etc. etc. on a blog that
by its
very nature is fraught with personal biting comments (like yours) and pithy responses.
akira,
science is fickle
by its
very nature.
Pedigree of Atheistic and Creationist Philosophy of
Science Ambiguous A very positive review in the science journal Nature affirms that the new book Worlds before Adam, by the «influential historian of Earth Science» Martin Rudwick, «challenges the view that geology's development is a story of secular pr
Science Ambiguous A
very positive review in the
science journal Nature affirms that the new book Worlds before Adam, by the «influential historian of Earth Science» Martin Rudwick, «challenges the view that geology's development is a story of secular pr
science journal
Nature affirms that the new book Worlds before Adam,
by the «influential historian of Earth
Science» Martin Rudwick, «challenges the view that geology's development is a story of secular pr
Science» Martin Rudwick, «challenges the view that geology's development is a story of secular progress.
For far from being a deviation from biblical truth, this setting of man over against the sum total of things, his subject - status and the object - status and mutual externality of things themselves, are posited in the
very idea of creation and of man's position vis - a-vis
nature determined
by it: it is the condition of man meant in the Bible, imposed
by his createdness, to be accepted, acted through... In short, there are degrees of objectification... the question is not how to devise an adequate language for theology, but how to keep its necessary inadequacy transparent for what is to be indicated
by it...» Hans Jonas, Phenomenon of Life, pp. 258 - 59; cf. also Schubert Ogden's helpful discussion on «Theology and Objectivity,» Journal of Religion 45 (1965): 175 - 95; Ian G. Barbour, Issues in
Science and Religion (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice - Hall, 1966), pp. 175 - 206; and Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).
A
very helpful introduction is Birch, L. Charles,
Nature and God (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1965); also
by the same author, «A Biological Basis for Human Purpose,» Zygon, 8,1973, pp. 244 - 260); «
Nature, Humanity and God in Ecological Perspective,» in Shinn, Roger L., ed., Faith and
Science in an Unjust World: Report of the World Council of Churches Conference on Faith,
Science and the Future, Vol.
We need a new grounding of the
very concepts of «truth» and «
nature» as objective realities in the dynamic and inter-relative cosmos uncovered
by modern
science.
If people think the initial vision of Whitehead, which reveals such a different vision of
nature as given to us in bare sense - awareness, ought to be explored — and if it is explored you get a
very new,
very wide set of possibilities for
science — then one ought to start
by flying to find out what his units of the passage of
nature are — namely these «factors» which he also calls durations.
Indeed, the
very division of the sexes, eloquently depicted in Genesis, and a fact of
nature as studied
by the
sciences, was an event that occurred in view of the Christ to come.
By its
very nature, environmental
science tends to be multidisciplinary in character.
Biomedical
science,
by its
very nature, is not work that neatly falls into hourly units or shifts.
The field of regenerative medicine, because of the
very nature of the
science and the rapidly evolving clinical developments, not infrequently lends itself to often close calls between what constitutes an individualized treatment being performed
by a doctor within the scope of his medical practice on the one hand, and what constitutes a medical product that is currently subject to the authorities Congress has already charged the FDA with exercising.
The LOR
Science Prize selection committee was
very pleased to recognize the comprehensive
nature of the studies led
by a young scientist like Dr Ross, who is both
very accomplished and also has had impact in the field of quantum and frustrated magnetism.
One of the challenges lies within
science itself; scientific studies,
by their
very nature, attempt to isolate all of life's complexity down to two variables in order to study them while nutrition, as it's practised in the day to day lives of human beings, consists of an infinite number of important factors that are often not taken into account.
However, it is
very common in food
science studies to blanch a food
by placing it in boiling water
very briefly, on the order of 1 - 3 minutes depending on the volume, type, and cut / uncut
nature of the food.
Guests at this year's gala will enjoy a moderated conversation with the
very gifted Marisa Tomei followed
by an elegant dinner at the Perot Museum of
Nature &
Science.
I find it
very sad that
by the time corporate
science realizes the value of
nature, that it may be too late
What readers need to understand is that
science fiction novels -
by their
very nature - are meant to be inferior.
We humans have a
very funny way (you can call it hypocritical or schizophrenic) of loving the bennies and perks and conveniences brought to us
by science and then, when
nature and
science point out problems we are causing and should address, we seem to want to put on the blinders and simply push down on the gas pedal.
Science,
by it
very nature, only deals with relativity, quantifying numbers and partial observations which can only see a part of the whole.
Skeptical
by nature and the
very first point of interest for me was the the series
nature of the field of climate
science.
In fact, the WGI report is built upon a process which, as revealed
by the Climategate emails, is,
by its
very nature, designed not to produce an accurate view of the state of climate
science, but instead to be an «assessment» of the state of climate
science — an assessment largely driven
by preconceived ideas of the IPCC design team and promulgated
by various elite chapter authors.
Isn't
science,
by its
very nature, flawed and incomplete?
As part of this week's Earth Observation special (subscription required),
Nature has a commentary
by Euan Nisbet, atmospheric scientist at Royal Holloway, on the Keeling curve — which «ranks
very high indeed among the achievements of twentieth - century
science», he says — and similar studies in the field of Earth monitoring.
Cork, Ireland About Blog I am introducing Anni Mateo «All - in - One» Anti-aging Wrinkle / Lifting Cream as part of a new line of natural bioactive skin care products with a goal to offer the
very best in anti-aging skin care which gives a visible and lasting impact
by combining the best of
science and
nature.