On the contrary to being opposed to science, the idea is to try to give science a place at the podium and not be compromised by any corrupted
science coming from the side of the special interests that deserves no place in front of Congress.
Not exact matches
He no longer seeks the mystery, the divine, but is convinced that
science will at one point decipher everything... The other
side is that precisely
science itself is now regaining an insight as to its limits, that many scientists today are saying: «Doesn't everything have to
come from somewhere?»
It can be used for a whole range of tasks,
from playing high - def video to word processing, and its designers, a group of Cambridge University computer scientists,
came up with the idea of Raspberry Pi to encourage more children to get involved with the programming
side of computer
science, after seeing skill levels among A level students dwindle since the mid 1990s.
A lot of the suspicion
from the social
sciences and humanities
side is fading, and there are young people
coming in who are eager to get what they can
from the natural
sciences.
The suggestion
comes from two Italian MEPs
from different political
sides: Luigi Berlinguer, a democrat and former
science minister in his country, and Amalia Sartori, the conservative chairwoman of the Parliament's research committee.
«Twenty - two brilliant and experienced leaders
coming from the scientific community, policy - makers, industry, and NGOs
from both
sides of the Atlantic, sitting together in a small room for a day, engaging in a lively, open debate without any taboos, and
coming up with recommendations on the do's and don'ts in providing
science - based advice to policy - makers.
My concern is with inaccurate
science, no matter what
side it's
coming from.
Furthermore,
science is yet to
come up with a single
side effect
from the use of folic acid.
The cast and creative team's beliefs in time travel runs the gamut: Trevorrow says, «On the
science side, the great inventions don't always
come from someone working at a big corporation — they could
come from that crazy lunatic building things in the garage.
I think, had Exxon continued in that role, there might not be such a cacophony of anti-climate arguments that are ongoing now because there would have been somebody at the table who
came from the
side of fossil fuel use and would have been shown to be a leader in terms of the
science and this was their reasoned opinion as to what was going on.
Andrew Revkin Boy, Michael, if my writing and blogging has allowed even one person (you) to step out of the fog of competing messages and obfuscated
science in the climate arena, I feel it's been worth the hassles (and all that «scorching» you refer to, which has
come from folks on all
sides of this issue at one point or another).
From HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY and the «one -
sided science» department
comes this ridiculous study that ignores two important things.
This discussion was on the actual
science of dendroclimatology and while there are some snide remarks on both
sides, I don't see why that would deter anyone
from coming here and getting down and dirty over theory or data.