Indeed, it aims to be a deductive
science drawing its conclusions from a limited number of assumptions.
Not exact matches
Griffin brings together passages in
Science and the Modern World which show that,
from the later point of view, Whitehead should have
drawn the
conclusion of panexperientialism.
The Faith of a Physicist by Cambridge physicist and Anglican priest John Polkinghorne is a compendium of
conclusions drawn from decades of dialogue between natural
science and Christian theology.
Science is, in fact, provisional, in the sense that our
conclusions about the age of the earth are less solid than the observations
from which those
conclusions are
drawn.
Having participants choose their own group is a major issue for
drawing meaningful
conclusions in
science because there's the possibility that something about the people who choose a particular group might be inherently different
from the people who choose the other group.
In the long - term, this effort may expand to include collecting data
from across these surveys to
draw conclusions about public engagement with
science more broadly.
On 20 December, the United States government — acting on advice
from the US National
Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB)-- asked both journals to publish only the main
conclusions of two flu studies, but not to reveal details «that could enable replication of the experiments by those who would seek to do harm» (see «Call to censor flu studies
draws fire»).
Clauset and co-authors reported on the
conclusions they
drew from «complete and hand - curated data on the placements of nearly 19,000 tenure - track or tenured faculty, among 461 North American departmental or school - level academic units, in the disciplines of computer
science, business, and history -LSB-, which]... represent highly distinct scholastic traditions.»
Schultz, a professor of synoptic meteorology, and co-author Dr Vladimir Janković, a
science historian specialising in weather and climate, say the short - term, large variability
from year to year in high - impact weather makes it difficult, if not impossible, to
draw conclusions about the correlation to longer - term climate change.
Statistics is the
science of
drawing informed
conclusions from large amounts of data.
From one Israeli scientist's objection to Bedouin encroachment on the watershed of an experimental farm, he
draws the sweeping
conclusion that «in Israel
science is political».
Trying to
draw conclusions from population groups is extremely difficult and can lead to very poor
science.
So, being able to generate data, being able to work with data,
draw conclusions from evidence — those are all skills that you can gain
from doing a
science or maths at that higher level, and that can be transferrable into many different careers and in life generally.
Timesha Cohen, a member of our learning community and teacher
from Propel McKeesport Public Charter School, has talked about the impact of her participation as positively affecting herself and her students: «My students are able to make connections between what they know and what they need to know, as well as
draw conclusions based on patterns they may notice in both math and
science.
Drawing Conclusions I expected the results
from TIMSS 2011 to show U.S. students ranked in the middle of the international pack in mathematics and
science based the amount of rhetoric and press extolling the supposed failure of the U.S. public schools.
A key component of
science instruction is teaching students how to observe accurately and
draw conclusion from their observations.
As Paul Meehl (one of the founding fathers of the importance of quant models versus human judgements) wrote: There is no controversy in social
science which shows such a large body of qualitatively diverse studies coming out so uniformly in the same direction as this one... predicting everything
from the outcomes of football games to the diagnosis of liver disease and when you can hardly come up with a half a dozen studies showing even a weak tendencyin favour of the clinician, it is time to
draw a practical
conclusion.
Science is a methodology for
drawing reliable
conclusions from imperfect data.
What the particular
conclusions of empirical
science draw their strength
from consists for the most part in the multiple, largely independent lines of empirical investigation.
Andrew David Thaler of the super Southern Fried
Science blog has posted a valuable and cautionary piece: Bluefin Tuna and the Tsukiji Fish Auction: caution in
drawing conclusions from record breaking prices.
The results
from this unusually long time series highlight both the potential pitfalls of
drawing hasty
conclusions from short - term studies and the importance of long - term experiments in ecosystem and climate
science.
So, imagine one of Dr. Mann's attorney's asking archly, why exactly, is it, National Review, that you don't believe the
conclusions Dr. Mann
draws from his
science, hmmm?
Well... as long as by «
science» you mean «climate
science» and not the kind of
science that
draws analytical
conclusions from empirical data.
He was questioning climate
science, as opposed to questioning the
conclusions that can properly be
drawn from the findings of climate
science?
It is > the job of politicians to
draw conclusions from science.
As I said before, the
science at CO2
Science is crap, They may cite peer - reviewed
science, but they
draw their own
conclusions which differe
from that of the peer reviewed papers.
Put these things together with the fact that no hard evidence of outside hacking has been presented by UEA, despite «illegal break - in» becoming an almost desperate mantra
from the earliest days, presumably to avoid the unwashed masses
drawing the
conclusion that not only the
science isn't settled, one of the insiders hates the phony consensus so much they're willing to go to these extreme lengths to bust it open... and I've never rated the outside operation theory one bit.
As for seeing what one believes, the thing about
science is to remove as much of that as possible, and to work to see, to
draw conclusions from observation and analysis, not the other way around.
Each of these fields staggers toward a true understanding of nature in fits and starts, but each appears to have yielded valuable insights that help us deal more effectively with the world we live in — a
conclusion I
draw from considerable familiarity with the details of each of these
sciences.
What
conclusions can we
draw from these two case studies in the publication of dubious
science by peer reviewed journals?
Whatever your preference, the
conclusion drawn from these figures is the same: there is a clear gap between the consensus in the scientific literature and
science - based blogs on the one hand, and contrarian blogs on the other hand.
Taxpayers are also stakeholders with a valid interest in the
conclusions drawn from billions of dollars invested in climate
science, and many of these taxpayers are among those who need the information the most in order to better plan and prepare for climate change impacts.
Both sides are too quick to
draw support
from social
science research when correlations support their cherished
conclusions.