Sentences with phrase «science editorial work»
Trudy Rising, president and publisher of Trifolium Books Inc. in Toronto, believes that the opportunities in science editorial work for those that love both science and writing are legion.
http://www.sciencemag.org/ Not exact matches
The editorial advocated a re-evaluation of Thomas» thought in the light of the discoveries of modern science and suggested that in such a work of re-evaluation and realignment Holloway's contribution was eminently worthy ofconsideration.
In an editorial published in Science in 2015, Mohammad Farhadi, Iran's Minister of Science, Research and Technology, said that sanctions «pushed its science, industry, and service sectors to cooperate in new and fruitful ways and also forced scientists to work more creatively and promote a knowledge - based economy for the first time in Iran's history.Science in 2015, Mohammad Farhadi, Iran's Minister of Science, Research and Technology, said that sanctions «pushed its science, industry, and service sectors to cooperate in new and fruitful ways and also forced scientists to work more creatively and promote a knowledge - based economy for the first time in Iran's history.Science, Research and Technology, said that sanctions «pushed its science, industry, and service sectors to cooperate in new and fruitful ways and also forced scientists to work more creatively and promote a knowledge - based economy for the first time in Iran's history.science, industry, and service sectors to cooperate in new and fruitful ways and also forced scientists to work more creatively and promote a knowledge - based economy for the first time in Iran's history.»
Bill has also worked with the Science editorial team to raise awareness of Science / AAAS within academic institutions in developed and developing countries.
MARIETTE DICHRISTINA, ACTING EDITOR IN CHIEF, REPLIES: We hold White's work in high regard, but the editorial was published more than a month before the Science special issue.
Editorial: Planning Career Paths for Ph.D. s Jim Austin and Bruce Alberts, 7 September By turning introspection into a structured exercise, myIDP allows science trainees to translate a vague source of anxiety into a working plan.
In an email to Science, the paper's corresponding author, Toshihiro Nakajima of Tokyo Medical University, defended the work, stating: «Our manuscript was formally published after an intensive scientific review done by reviewers and by the editorial board of Scientific Reports.»
Editorial: Planning Career Paths for Ph.D. s Jim Austin and Bruce Alberts By turning introspection into a structured exercise, myIDP allows science trainees to translate a vague source of anxiety into a working plan.
And now an editorial in the journal Public Library of Science Medicine takes the position that unhealthy eating associated with unusual working hours could be considered a new form of occupational hazard.
In an e-mail to Science, the person listed on the journal's website as editor - in - chief, Raghavendra Kulkarni, a professor of pharmacy at the BLDEA College of Pharmacy in Bijapur, India, stated that he has «not had access to [the] editorial process by Elsevier» since April, when the journal's owner «started working on [the] editorial process.»
An overwhelming majority of U.K. scientists opposed to the «Brexit» referendum on European Union membership, must, now that Britons voted to leave the EU, «work hard to urge policymakers to promote continued scientific collaborations,» according to an editorial in Science.
Four months after a paper it published on the genetics of centenarians was criticized for possible flaws, Science published an Editorial Expression of Concern about the work, noting that the authors are redoing their data.
His work has been published in various scholarly journals, such as: Social Science Quarterly, The Rural Educator, Educational Policy, the Journal of Education Finance, and the Journal of School Choice: International Research and Reform, where he serves on the editorial board.
However, it is not foolproof — a deeply flawed paper can end up being published under a number of different potential circumstances: (i) the work is submitted to a journal outside the relevant field (e.g. a paper on paleoclimate submitted to a social science journal) where the reviewers are likely to be chosen from a pool of individuals lacking the expertise to properly review the paper, (ii) too few or too unqualified a set of reviewers are chosen by the editor, (iii) the reviewers or editor (or both) have agendas, and overlook flaws that invalidate the paper's conclusions, and (iv) the journal may process and publish so many papers that individual manuscripts occasionally do not get the editorial attention they deserve.