Sentences with phrase «science moves along»

Myths like this one sometimes make it seem that science moves along in a series of epiphanies, hopping from one transcendent moment to another.

Not exact matches

Think - tank Activities SOAAN will progress in stepwise fashion in order to develop the outputs mentioned above: Step 1) Review existing science and actions: An overview or survey of the existing science on the topic, including a discussion of the limitations of scope, empirical data, and their reliability and applicability to the organic sector's understanding of best practice; Step 2) Actors engagements: Identification in both public and private sectors of the institutions and individuals active on the topic and their respective roles and networks, so that SOAAN and the organic sector then moves to engage them, along with think tanking activities; Step 3) Think tank: Development of the model, the strategy and promotional / advocacy tools through think tank efforts including piloting cases to gain experience and showcase practicability; Step 4) Synthesis: Publication of the results, tools and recommendations.

Well the science would still move right along because the scientists are all going to see it in the actual journals, so we are not interfering with the progress of science, and by the time we would actually write about this stuff there would be a much clearer opinion about whether or not this was a real finding and whether or not it held up in any sort of way.

«Maybe the flood control efforts after Allison are working,» says infectious disease researcher Herbert Dupont of the University of Texas Health Science Center, «but we need the storm to move along!»

But the rise of Nazi Germany, the devastation brought by World War II, and the restructuring of Humboldt along Soviet lines — with much research moved out to the East German Academy of Science — drained the university of a lot of its vitality.

The film doesn't dumb down astrophysics like Billy Bob Thorton explaining the «Road Runner thrust move» in Armageddon, but it also doesn't over complicate science where you need to take an advanced college course just to follow along.

posted at Ian Martyn, Science Ficiton Writer, saying, «The advice «If it doesn't move the story along, take it out,» — good advice or not?

Also relevant is my chapter for the 2005 edition of «A Field Guide for Science Writers,» in which I describe the conditions that set journalists up for a tough time in conveying developments in a field that, like all science, moves in fits and starts, with plenty of missteps along the path toward greater understScience Writers,» in which I describe the conditions that set journalists up for a tough time in conveying developments in a field that, like all science, moves in fits and starts, with plenty of missteps along the path toward greater understscience, moves in fits and starts, with plenty of missteps along the path toward greater understanding.

There's also a LTER cruise in Western Antarctica in January and February that gives us not only temporal consistency, but an important spatial context since the cruise performs science experiments along different transects as it moves down the peninsula.

Now that it has moved a couple of decades along the learning curve, and consumed tens of $ BILLIONS$ of dollars, it has become an infantile science.

Move along folks nothing else to see here this science is settled by golly by gum.

Or do I misunderstand you, do you suggest some other means to get Science up off it's dead ass and get it moving along the path of self - correction?

I'm not quite sure how dismissing a (correct, as it turns out) assessment of glaciers as «Voodoo science» encourages debate but I guess, in classic Team style, «that was last week, move along please».

And why are you worried about a 2 year old paper, science is self correcting and besides reconstructions do nt matter, move along

Or you might look at misbehavior which is all too common in ordinary pseudoscience disputes, but which in the physical and biological sciences is very uncommon on the funded academic side: e.g., triumphalism about unfalsifiable claims, and circling the wagons around various kinds of data hiding (e.g., remarkably lackadaisical formal investigation of CRU even after FOIA violations, and broad enthusiasm for promoting the formal results into an informal full «nothing to see here, move along» exoneration).

GE's decision, along with new move - ins by drug companies such as Selvita, show the region is becoming an epicenter of the new global life sciences / technology economy, says Mark Stewart, senior vice president and branch manager in the Boston office of real estate services firm Savills Studley.