Sentences with phrase «science of living things»

Partly because of bad luck in the sinking of a ship containing Wallace's collection of specimens, he produced nothing remotely like the immense mass of facts assembled by the primary founder of the new science of living things.

Not exact matches

For one thing, «There are a lot of good drugs on the market for heart disease right now that come in generic form,» says Neil Lesser, a principal at Deloitte who specializes in the life sciences, in an interview with Fortune.

As science suggests, those memories are bound to make you happier than you expect, but Rubin also notes that «we tend to write down the happier things,» which also focuses the mind on the positive aspects of life, boosting joy with very little effort.

Rich = not just financial, it's emotional, spiritual, health, etc. [6:01] Two skills for true wealth, first is the «Science of Achievement» [6:34] After talking to top investors, Tony found that everyone invests differently, but there are some things that everyone has in common: The Core Four [6:46] Same as health, everyone is unique, but there are fundamentals that if you violate the rules you're going to not have energy, get sick [7:23] Three fundamentals for achievement [7:32] What is something in your life today that once was a dream?

RE: «when you're standing before your judgment being judged for the things you deny, how about taking all of those science books and «reason» with you» So, you're so SURE gawwwwwwd didn't give us science that you forego all medical treatment, and you live like the Amish....

I am really angry that religious people are unable to face the facts of life, reality, science, reason, logic, and that this causes them to waste their time, my time, vital resources, and to interfere in things they have no business interfering in as they violate the law, common sense, and refuse to respect any other people.

and being aware of your environment, being respectful of those of all beliefs and none beliefs, and of our world, and its about personal responsibility, with that said why is is such a bad thing to believe in something greater than yourself, how can somebody live there life without believing in something, what kind of life is that, life is meant to be discovered, its one big mystery, and all the science in the world can still not prove how we exactly came to be?

That is, those of us Christians who try to truly live a Christ - like life (without forcing it on anyone else, and without trying to «legislate» morality and faith vs. science) would simply like atheists and other anti-theists not to «broadbrush» the entire faith just because some (many) say and do things that are questionable re Christianity.

How would a person living in a desert know these things without actually someone telling him this?!!! And who is that someone?!!! No one at that time knew anything about big bang theory?!! The actual translation of the arabic word رتقا is it was like a fabric that got torn apart?!!! Isn't that big bang?!! And the other part that was proven too is that everything alive needs water to live?!!! How did they know that then?!!! Islam and science support each other and science only getting to prove things now which was mentioned 1500 years ago in the Quran!!!

Ask any biologist and they will tell you the same thing: it is the basis of all life sciences.

Especially when those people lived long before the modern era of science and had no knowledge of the things we now know to be true about the universe.

In the separation model, theology and science abide by different rules on different turfs, say different things about life and bespeak «different levels of knowledge.»

There are no moral absolutes, but there are such things as empathy, sympathy, logic, reason, common sense, and science to give me a much more effective and intelligent set of morals to live by.

Hey «smart one», your science that you love so much proves that things degrade over time instead of evolving into more complex forms of life.

Finally Islamic science was effected very badly by the Osman empire which was called (The Sick Man of the East), but although they are no longer here today, we are still not left alone to advance our lives or to try to create any thing for our selves or for humanity....

Instead, proponents of «creation - science» hold that the creation of the universe, the earth, living things, and man was accomplished through supernatural means inaccessible to human understanding.

The things in life that can be proven don't require faith — so don't deride people of faith because what they believe can not be proven by science.

Donald Johanson put the point effectively, if crudely: «You can't accept one part of science because it brings you good things like electricity and penicillin and throw away another part because it brings you some things you don't like about the origin of life.»

Slave labour, one milliard persons in unvoluntary hunger, life - saving medicine not available where needed too, polluted air and water, murders,...; what does any doctrine of science say about these things?

For far from being a deviation from biblical truth, this setting of man over against the sum total of things, his subject - status and the object - status and mutual externality of things themselves, are posited in the very idea of creation and of man's position vis - a-vis nature determined by it: it is the condition of man meant in the Bible, imposed by his createdness, to be accepted, acted through... In short, there are degrees of objectification... the question is not how to devise an adequate language for theology, but how to keep its necessary inadequacy transparent for what is to be indicated by it...» Hans Jonas, Phenomenon of Life, pp. 258 - 59; cf. also Schubert Ogden's helpful discussion on «Theology and Objectivity,» Journal of Religion 45 (1965): 175 - 95; Ian G. Barbour, Issues in Science and Religion (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice - Hall, 1966), pp. 175 - 206; and Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).

Here and there it may be, we can catch a glimpse of the wonderful order in nature, the regularity of the stars, scattered over the wide spaces of the universe yet obedient to one law; the order to be found even in the microscopic world, as also within visible things concerning which science has given such amazing information in recent years; the order in the construction of a flower or of an animal, from the flea to the whale, a noteworthy obedience to law even in the life of man.

The problem is that their stand on reason, logic, and science does not allow them to ascribe traits and feelings of living things to inanimate and non living objects like the moon, sea, stars, etc..

Peter learned two things from the dissidents: the notion of «living in the truth»; and the disconcerting thought that Communism and Western liberal democracy had things in common, modern science to begin with, that challenged human freedom and dignity.

Nevertheless, just as in science there are some overarching governing rules of the universe which tend to be active in all situations and events, so also in trying to understand some of the bad things that happen in life, there seem to be some overarching rules which guide and govern these actions.

Sewall Wright sees biological science as treating the externals of living things with deterministic and statistical laws, but he believes the creatures themselves have internality and freedom.

I believe a reading of Adventures of Ideas and the other works would justify saying there can be «no living [art, morality, religion and science] unless there is a widespread instinctive conviction in the existence of an Order of Things, and, in particular, of an Order of Nature» (SMW 5).

From: Home Comforts: or, Things worth knowing in every household: being a digest of facts established by science, observation and practical experience, respecting the important art of living well and cheaply, preserving health and prolonging life, by Edwin Troxell Freedley.

There's also an undeniable feel - based approach to life, a kind of folk science where personal experimentation and verification by introspection are the guiding principles, the kind of thing that lead cultures throughout the globe to be so enthralled by hot chilies since they were discovered in the New World.

Science studies and explains the existence of the non-living and living things on earth.

A fun outdoor science activity that let's you measure the biodiversity of living things in your backyard ecosystem!

While that probably IS a large part of it, I also think it's rooted in the surge of hero worship for doctors that began in the early 1900's as science progressed so rapidly and things like vaccinations saved millions of children from suffering miserable deaths and life crippling diseases (polio, anyone?)

It won't be until the ages of 5 to 7 that your child will enjoy the science of life processes and living things and doing simple experiments will have then excited and eager to find out more.

As with most things in life, when it comes to babies and the science of sleep, the only certainty is that there is no certainty.

Boris Johnson made light of the furore over Maria Miller's expenses, telling ITV News that «if things go wrong» for the Culture Secretary she should be able to find a job in London's burgeoning life sciences sector.

Zemsky said the important thing about approving the money is that the new lab needs to get built to capitalize on the life sciences market and the legacy of Wadsworth, considered one of the premier research labs in the country in the medical fields.

«I can't think of many things worse in life than being a Republican member of the Assembly,» said Hunter College political science professor Ken Sherrill.

Science writer Arney uses the «mitten cat» mutation as a springboard to explain all things DNA in this winning primer on «the cookbook of life.»

Children are prompted to cite examples of things they use or do that illustrate the impact of science on their life.

Computer simulations and hands - on displays allow visitors to Marvelous Molecules — The Secret of Life at the New York Hall of Science to peek inside the molecular structure of living things to see how chemicals affect the brain and how DNA passes on genetic traits.

Memorizing the expression «atoms are not created or destroyed» and balancing chemical equations — a common approach to teaching chemical reactions — has proved to be insufficient for helping students explain how living things gain mass, said Jo Ellen Roseman, director of Project 2061, a long - term initiative of the American Association for the Advancement of Science to improve science literacy and eduScience to improve science literacy and eduscience literacy and education.

Evolution: How We and All Living Things Came to Be by Daniel Loxton (2010); $ 18.95 at kidscanpress.com; ages 8 to 13 Eugenie Scott, executive director of the National Center for Science Education, touts this book as «an excellent introduction to a topic not frequently covered in children's books.

To support the biological science goal of image classification, we have developed several games and tools that let ordinary members of the public undertake to classify various photos of living things.

«This sort of thing — a life science biotech company — is essentially nothing without IP [intellectual property] protection.

But since January 2009, Ari Daniel Shapiro — he uses his middle name to avoid confusion with the Ari Shapiro who reports for NPR on the Department of Justice and legal affairs — has earned his living as an independent radio and multimedia producer, recording sounds, editing audio, and doing all the things necessary to create science - related radio shows for public radio and podcasts and audio slide shows for the Web sites of research institutions.

Published for all to see in this week's Science, Kay's approach is being hailed as a milestone in the science of «rhythm genetics», the push by geneticists to understand the mysterious daily, or «circadian», clocks that tick inside most living Science, Kay's approach is being hailed as a milestone in the science of «rhythm genetics», the push by geneticists to understand the mysterious daily, or «circadian», clocks that tick inside most living science of «rhythm genetics», the push by geneticists to understand the mysterious daily, or «circadian», clocks that tick inside most living things.

«This process may be making a lot of the stuff of life, without any help from things that are alive,» says John Rummel, senior scientist for astrobiology for NASA's Planetary Science Division, who was not involved in the study.

Weiss: To me, that's one of the most gratifying things that if we can make the argument that science is something everybody gets benefit from, not materially, but in their heads when they think about what the world is like and how comfortable or uncomfortable they are with the world, it gives you something to stew about and makes life a lot more interesting.

Science does not explain many aspects of human life such as love, friendships, and things like that.»

DiChristina: Yeah, I mean I think one of the things we don't realize working on the insides of Scientific American all the time is that the editor is not just working with the scientists but also they're reporting and going out to meetings and doing other things; they're [scouring] the world for the best science that matters for readers, have a lot of expertise themselves and it just seemed to me that this would be the kind of thing that readers might really find fascinating — what the editors of Scientific American [are] thinking based on all their conversations with the experts of the day covering the various areas of science and technology and how it affects our lives; and this was the genesis of this story.

So instead of jumping straight out of the bench science life, I agonized over things like: I have a technical degree, so I «should» continue in the technical realm and use all of the knowledge I've acquired.