Sentences with phrase «science on all sides of the climate debate»

John Holt, who was a member of the committee when the primer was written, said in an interview that the document was aimed at clarifying distortions of the science on all sides of the climate debate.

Not exact matches

Your very presence on the other side of the climate debate does more to validate the science than anything else you could do.

We believe this is necessary if science is to move on, and we hope that all those involved on all sides of the climate science debate will adopt this approach.

how refreshing to know that there can still be a civil discourse between «advocates on both sides of the charged debate over climate science and its implications for society.»

They are solid points that hold lessons for advocates on both sides of the charged debate over climate science and its implications for society.

I would rather spend my time on site that are hearing from voices on many spectrums: mainstream papers that have top - notch science coverage and a climate focus, or open - minded debates between environmentalists on both sides of the political arena.

A documentary exploring the other side of the climate - change debate and its ever - changing, but often - flawed science, «An Inconsistent Truth,» will air on Newsmax TV on Sunday at 10 p.m. ET.

Many people on the skeptical side of the climate debate see Jerry Ravetz» «postnormal science» as part of the problem, indeed the man himself as responsible in large part for formulations such as those of the late Stephen Schneider regarding making a judgement about the balance between truth and effectiveness.

In climate science, it is not hard to put names on «people» on both sides of the global warming debate.

Lets just say that I sense that both sides of the debate on climate change have biased POV's on any evidence that is placed before them and that a lot more work needs to be done before anyone can claim that the science is settled.

C'est tout — no science, but curiosity re dangers of global warming led me to climate debate daily and arguments fer both sides, especially Steve McIntyre and Jeff Id... then on ter the sainted Judith, Max Anacker, oh and kim.)

One of the world's most famous global warming contrarians says he sees eye to eye with Al Gore on climate science — for the most part — and claims his view have been distorted by those on both sides of the global warming debate.

I've seen both two sides of the climate debate, and in case you haven't noticed, one side contradicts the other on very complicated science details.

You address your question to ``... those on the co2 AGW side of the debate», and this confuses me because the IOP is clearly not addressing the science behind climate change in their submission, but rather the behavior of scientists and research institutions.

It's now frightening how little climate science is known by both sides of the debate on human causation of global warming.

One of the great oddities of the debate about climate science is the contempt for scientists displayed by the lay cheerleaders on both sides.

It does not appear to me that the use of intimidation is anything like symmetrical in the climate «debate,» which makes sense given the style and content of commentators such as Limbaugh, for which there is no functional equivalent on the side of the mainstream science.

As I have argued previously, vocal representatives on both sides the climate debate act as if they can't wait for the total defeat of science and humanism.

On one side of the «debate» we are «denying» science that shows the world has warmed, and on the other side climate science is apparently being used to drive a socialist anti-freedom agendOn one side of the «debate» we are «denying» science that shows the world has warmed, and on the other side climate science is apparently being used to drive a socialist anti-freedom agendon the other side climate science is apparently being used to drive a socialist anti-freedom agenda.