Sentences with phrase «science points towards»

Science points towards a creator — not the absence of one

As I have outlined, I believe science points towards a super intelligence of some fashion rather than away from it.

Not exact matches

My point is Science is moving towards greater understanding as is our understanding of God.

What, to use phrase a phrase of the Hungarian philosopher of science Michael Polanyi, is the «hidden reality» towards which they point?

On this point also cf. Milic Capec, «Bergson's Theory of the Mind - Brain Relation,» in Bergson and Modern Thought: Towards a Unified Science,, esp.

The Bible shows God creating suddenly and from one point which is that singularity event science leans towards.

The continued efforts of governments to ensure prohibition remains in place forces them to continually twist logic to the point that drug policy has veered towards pure science fiction.

The results, which include the critical studies carried out at the Advanced Photon Source (APS), a DOE Office of Science user facility at Argonne, also point the way towards a more economical and greener industrial process for neon production.

Figure 3: Left: a typical science image, with the colors inverted and an arrow pointing towards a candidate variable object.

While science is increasingly pointing towards an infinite universe, it has no ability explain what that really means.

Well, I dug into the science and all signs are pointing towards turmeric, even in latte form, having a myriad of health benefits.

Many of the references in the artwork point towards a calamity of science fiction characters and Geo's own blend of weird but friendly «critters» marry the likes of Star Wars with the Oculus Rift device.

What if we take a srep back towards Justin Biddles main point; «There are serious problems..., many of which can be traced to the influence of commercial interests on research...» and apply it to climate science.

This process, which is wrongly taken to be objective and authoritative, has been made the point of departure for over-presumptive conclusions which are biased towards alarm, in the mistaken belief that the science» is settled».

Some good points made here about how Catalyst could change towards «good» science journalism, but the challenge of science instructing rather than entertaining to a mass audience on a public network still needs models — any suggestions?

There is no validity in the «hockey stick» plot, «talking up» such predeterministic «experiments» is NOT an action of SCIENCE, but of Politics and I again point to the persistent attempts to cite «attitude» towards the «greenhouse platform» in terms of a «Political Siding», again to escape notice of the LACK of SCIENCE within the «greenhouse platform»... Your's, Peter K. Anderson a.k.a. Hartlod (tm) From the PC of Peter K Anderson E-Mail: [email protected] http://hartlod.blogspot.com/

But the point of the whole op - ed piece, as well as the Science paper, was that our recent history is, in fact, consistent with our current projections of long - term trends towards stronger hurricanes worldwide.

* Here Anthony Watts acknowledges the fact that AGW has nothing to do with faith, but is true and tried science that should be the guideline for future, as physics and engineering both point to the fact that once a system that tries to reach an equilibrium according to QM (approximated by Newtonian mechanics) is disturbed enough it will change towards a new equilibrium state with potentially catastrophic and chaotic alterations in the system, which will present problems for the subsystems functioning within this system, in the AGW case this could be the human cultural system, though Watts doesn't mention it in the lead.

Sadly, the climate science community has been on a multi-decadal quest for proof of the «GHE» hypothesis, last I checked they are pointing towards the «deep oceans» as the location of their prey.