Sentences with phrase «science radiative greenhouse effect»

I think these folks just can't stand the blow to their Ego's to really accept that the «climate science radiative greenhouse effect» really is a HOAX.

The following diagram is how climate science thinks of heat flow and thermodynamics, and all others who subscribe to «steel greenhouse» ideas and the climate science radiative greenhouse effect:

Willis» steel greenhouse in vacuum really is the best representation of the climate science radiative greenhouse effect.

Not exact matches

There are no such Laws, Axioms or Postulates, which should be proof enough that: «There is no radiative climate science greenhouse effect.»

The issue which debunks climate science is its radiative greenhouse effect violating basic thermodynamics, not whether the atmosphere retains heat overnight because it doesn't have time to cool to 2.7 K.

Climate science, as based on its radiative greenhouse effect and its «heat pile up» postulate, is founded on an entirely irrational and non-existent premise, as we see the result of for example in the last post.

In the latter case it is about heat transfer and the way climate science has bungled the thermodynamics, in the former it is not about the radiative greenhouse effect as that is not about reflection.

What is significant for the implications of climate «science» is the hypothesis of radiative equilibrium and the model used to describe the «greenhouse effect».

Instead, the aim of our Science paper was to illustrate as clearly and as simply as possible the basic operating principles of the terrestrial greenhouse effect in terms of the sustaining radiative forcing that is provided by the non-condensing greenhouse gases, which is further augmented by the feedback response of water vapor and clouds.