Sentences with phrase «science side too»

There is a lot of great research on improving Asian rice for African farmers that is being done by brilliant AfricaRice scientists, and they are working hard on the social science side too.

Not exact matches

The science side of me looks at the systematic ways that systems, elements, molecules and atoms come together to form life and I realize it is very easy for me to believe that an intelligence greater than mine is definitely a possibility too.

This is why the NRA and Republicans need evangelicals on their side — they need people who have been conditioned to not think too much about things, who think science books are bad.

On the other side, creationists simply deny scientific data; but Intelligent Design, having abandoned this tactic, now tries to use science to promote religious doctrines, and this, too, is a philosophical error.

It is time for peace between both sides, between science and faith, there is far too much vitriol from two sides who are are actually care about the truth, and approach it in a different manner.

Amen.The thing is too many people from both sides try to disprove the other, Scientist (well some) will say there is no God Ala Hawkings here and then some believers will say that evolution or anything pertaining to science that they don't understand is false.I don't believe that science and God are mutually exclusive.For me personally science helps to explain a lot of things regarding creation, almost like giving me a window into how creative God is.I believe that God uses science to show us how awesome he is.To me science does not disprove Gods existence it actually reaffirms it on a human logic level, for me.You may disagree, that's fine, but this is just how I see it.

But science is on your side — you can't hold your baby too much, and you're not creating a whiny brat by picking him up.

Clearly there is a balance to strike between doom - ridden messages and «bright - side» opportunities, and uncertainties around the science and the expected effects of climate change must be factored in too.

Keeping with the Oscars theme, if the previously - posted World Science Festival video was a bit too long for a Sunday evening, Vi Hart has a short and sweet video of a (one - sided) Möbius strip on which she has rigged to play a musical theme from Harry Potter.

Of late this side of science has taken a backseat in the public mind to what I call the accumulation view of science — that it is a pile of facts way too big for us to ever hope to conquer.

Based on these findings, any shortage in America's scientific labor market is «most likely a demand - side problem of STEM [science, technology, engineering, and mathematics] career opportunities that are less attractive than career opportunities in other fields» rather than a supply - side problem of too few Americans with scientific training, asserted Salzman in congressional testimony presented on 6 November before the House Committee on Science and Technology's Subcommittee on Technology and Innoscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics] career opportunities that are less attractive than career opportunities in other fields» rather than a supply - side problem of too few Americans with scientific training, asserted Salzman in congressional testimony presented on 6 November before the House Committee on Science and Technology's Subcommittee on Technology and InnoScience and Technology's Subcommittee on Technology and Innovation.

Ideologues will continue to exist, on both sides, and the political game is only too happy to perpetuate the fight, hijacking both science and religion for its own ends.

Others fear that if the balance tips too far, the «public interest» side of the science system — known for its commitment to independence and objectivity — will atrophy.

The science is on side too, with researchers at the University of Hertfordshire in the UK finding women to be the superior multitaskers.

I studied to be a dietitian in college and found it to be too one - sided — lots of science but no real focus on the wisdom of Nature.

A responsible skeptic will request that you remain open minded to opinions from both sides, and consider the uncertainties involved * without * prejudging them based on the demonstrable human predilection toward a «herd mentality» — by «herd mentality», I mean that once a consensus is formed, a flock of «me too» science papers become much more easily accepted, by peer review journals, than the skeptics» papers.

The side benefit would be those other disciplines that would be affected — ecology, ecosystem, biological science, environmental management, forestry, silvics, bioclimatology books would all have to be re-written too.

Or you might look at misbehavior which is all too common in ordinary pseudoscience disputes, but which in the physical and biological sciences is very uncommon on the funded academic side: e.g., triumphalism about unfalsifiable claims, and circling the wagons around various kinds of data hiding (e.g., remarkably lackadaisical formal investigation of CRU even after FOIA violations, and broad enthusiasm for promoting the formal results into an informal full «nothing to see here, move along» exoneration).

But too often many of the hypotheses that make science work are also a bit on the esoteric side.

Both sides are too quick to draw support from social science research when correlations support their cherished conclusions.